KadeHeyborne/think-bigger
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Compare commits

merge into: KadeHeyborne:main
Branches Tags
KadeHeyborne:main
KadeHeyborne:master
...
pull from: KadeHeyborne:master
Branches Tags
KadeHeyborne:master
KadeHeyborne:main

No commits in common. "main" and "master" have entirely different histories.
main ... master

42 changed files with 12895 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Expand all files Collapse all files

20
.config/think_bigger/agents/system/file-watcher.dana Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
// File Watcher Agent - Monitors file system changes
agent FileWatcher {
watch_paths: ["~/think_bigger_data"]
ignore_patterns: [".git", "node_modules", "*.tmp"]
on_file_created(file_path) {
log("New file detected: " + file_path)
trigger_processing(file_path)
}
on_file_modified(file_path) {
log("File modified: " + file_path)
update_index(file_path)
}
on_file_deleted(file_path) {
log("File deleted: " + file_path)
remove_from_index(file_path)
}
}

28
.config/think_bigger/agents/templates/researcher.dana Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
// Research Agent - Automated information gathering
agent Researcher {
search_sources: ["web", "local_files", "apis"]
max_results: 10
relevance_threshold: 0.7
research_topic(topic) {
results = search_all_sources(topic)
filtered_results = filter_by_relevance(results, relevance_threshold)
summary = generate_summary(filtered_results)
create_knowledge_node(topic, summary, filtered_results)
return summary
}
search_web(query) {
// Web search implementation
return web_results
}
search_local(query) {
// Local file search implementation
return local_results
}
}

41
.config/think_bigger/config.json Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
{
"version": "1.0.0",
"system": {
"data_directory": "~/think_bigger_data",
"backup_directory": "~/think_bigger_backups",
"log_level": "INFO",
"auto_backup": true,
"backup_frequency": "daily"
},
"processing": {
"embedding_model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2",
"chunk_size": 512,
"overlap": 50,
"max_file_size": "100MB",
"supported_formats": ["pdf", "md", "txt", "html", "docx"]
},
"ui": {
"theme": "dark",
"font_size": "medium",
"sidebar_width": 300,
"graph_layout": "force",
"default_view": "graph"
},
"agents": {
"enabled": true,
"max_concurrent": 3,
"timeout": 300,
"sandbox": true
},
"integrations": {
"notion": {
"enabled": false,
"api_key": "",
"database_id": ""
},
"obsidian": {
"enabled": false,
"vault_path": ""
}
}
}

23
.config/think_bigger/domains/default-domain/README.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# {{domain}}
{{description}}
## Quick Start
- How to add new content
- Key concepts and navigation
- Important agents and automations
## Structure
- `inbox/`: New content entry point
- `notes/`: Processed knowledge
- `projects/`: Active work
- `archive/`: Historical content
## Key Topics
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
## Related Domains
- [Related Domain 1](../related-domain-1/)
- [Related Domain 2](../related-domain-2/)

19
.config/think_bigger/domains/default-domain/_meta/domain-config.json Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
{
"name": "Default Domain",
"description": "Template for new knowledge domains",
"tags": ["template", "default"],
"relationships": {
"parent_domains": [],
"child_domains": [],
"related_domains": []
},
"agents": {
"default_researcher": "researcher.dana",
"default_summarizer": "summarizer.dana"
},
"settings": {
"auto_tag": true,
"auto_link": true,
"backup_frequency": "daily"
}
}

29
.config/think_bigger/templates/notes/default.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# {{title}}
**Date**: {{date}}
**Tags**: {{tags}}
**Domain**: {{domain}}
## Summary
Brief summary of the content...
## Key Points
- Point 1
- Point 2
- Point 3
## Details
Detailed content here...
## Related
- [[Related Note 1]]
- [[Related Note 2]]
## References
- [Source 1](url)
- [Source 2](url)

3
.grok/settings.json Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
{
"model": "grok-code-fast-1"
}

3
README.md
View File

@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
# think-bigger
Advanced Second Brain PKM System with Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture

3
docs/.grok/settings.json Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
{
"model": "grok-code-fast-1"
}

4121
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on.json Normal file
View File

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

699
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on_transcript.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,699 @@
============================================================
YOUTUBE VIDEO TRANSCRIPT
============================================================
Title: AI Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture (Experts only)
Channel: Discover AI
Upload Date: 2025-11-27
Duration: 01:11:02
Views: 8,597
Likes: 452
URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GGuKOrooJA
ANALYSIS:
--------------------
Quality Rating: 8.5/10
Content Type: educational
Target Audience: advanced
Technical Level: basic
Key Topics: AI models, RAG, Empowering, Experts, artificial intelligence, LLM, Dual, Perspectives, Multi-modal model, VLA
Summary: All rights w/ authors:
"MirrorMind: Empowering OmniScientist with the Expert Perspectives and Collective Knowledge of Human Scientists"
Qingbin Zeng 1 Bingbing Fan 1 Zhiyu Chen 2 Sijian Ren 1 Zhilun Z...
TRANSCRIPT:
============================================================
[0.0s - 3.2s] Hello, community. So great to do you back.
[3.8s - 8.6s] Today I have a little bit of an EI revolution for you. So at first, welcome to our channel,
[8.6s - 14.6s] this Kariai. We have a look at the latest EI research paper, the latest three research paper that
[14.6s - 20.9s] I selected here for this particular video. And I will talk about a dual manifold cognitive
[20.9s - 27.4s] architecture. And I think this is a little bit of an EI revolution. And I will argue that this
[27.4s - 33.3s] might be even the future of the complete EI industry. Let's have a look. Now you know what is the
[33.3s - 39.8s] problem? Our LLAMs operate currently on a single manifold hypothesis. They flatten all the training
[39.8s - 45.1s] data, all the personal habit, all the individual bias, all the historic facts, and all the collective
[45.1s - 51.5s] reasoning of um, alpha domain like physics or chemistry into a single high dimensional probability
[52.5s - 58.3s] and up until now, this was just perfect. It was great. But I'm going to argue that our do
[58.3s - 66.0s] that our DMCA, our dual magnifold cognitive architecture will define intelligence much better,
[66.6s - 75.0s] not as a next token prediction like we have currently with our LLAMs, but as a geometric intersection
[75.0s - 81.0s] of two distinct topological vector spaces that we are going to build. Now have a look at this.
[81.8s - 89.7s] I'm just amazed what here Gemini 3 pro image preview my little nano banana pro can do.
[90.4s - 95.7s] And I spent about 20 minutes to describe this image here to nano banana pro. And after three
[95.7s - 102.6s] times we got this beautiful thing. We gonna go through each and everything. So let's start.
[102.6s - 108.4s] This is our paper of today. This is here by Jinghua University in China. And November 21st,
[108.4s - 116.4s] 2025, Miro Mind. And the title tells it all. We want here more or less to Miro a real human mind.
[116.4s - 123.5s] We want really to understand a certain scientific personality empowering the omniscientist,
[123.5s - 129.7s] the AI scientist with the expert perspective and the collective knowledge of human scientists.
[129.7s - 134.7s] So we're not satisfied anymore to build a synthetic AI system, but we want to bring a closer to
[134.7s - 141.3s] the human scientist. You immediately see that we have a common topic, the AI persona agents.
[141.3s - 147.4s] Like in one of my last videos I showed you the contextual instantiation here of AI persona agents
[147.4s - 153.4s] like shown by Stanford University just some days ago. And now we have here the other outstanding
[153.4s - 160.1s] university, Jinghua University and they have now the same topic. And they tell us, you know,
[160.2s - 164.8s] when asked to act as a scientist, you know, and have your prompt here to your AI,
[164.8s - 170.1s] hey, act as a financial broker, act as a medical expert, act as a scientist,
[170.1s - 176.9s] a standard LLM up until now relies now on a flattened representation of all the textual patterns.
[176.9s - 183.1s] But you know what, it lacks the complete structural memory of a specific individual cognitive
[183.1s - 191.0s] trajectory. And this is what Jinghua University is trying to map now to and advance the AI system.
[191.0s - 198.0s] So what they do, they shift here the paradigm from a pure role playing, you are now a medical
[198.0s - 202.8s] expert, which is more or less fragile because you have no idea about the pre-training data for this
[202.8s - 210.8s] particular LLM to a cognitive simulation, which is structured and constrained. I'm going to explain
[210.8s - 217.0s] why we have structure and what are the mathematical formulas for the constrained we're going to
[217.0s - 225.0s] impose on a specific LLM. Now, the orders of mere mind organ are that the scientific discovery
[225.0s - 231.3s] is not just factory retrieval. So as we go here to a very specific case, we go into science and we
[231.3s - 236.8s] want to have here a discovery process. I want to find new pattern, new interdistinonal
[236.9s - 242.7s] plenary pattern between physics, mathematics, chemistry, pharmacology, whatever. So it is about
[242.7s - 248.6s] simulating now the specific cognitive style of a scientist, more or less the individual memory of
[248.6s - 254.9s] a human that is now constrained by the field norms. This means by the collective memory.
[257.3s - 261.0s] And I think this is really the end of one size fits all age,
[261.7s - 267.6s] because all this, more or less, flat generalist framework like Leagley Act or Autogen,
[267.6s - 273.0s] they all fail in specialized domain and have multiple videos on this. But now we're going to build
[273.0s - 280.3s] not just the digital twin, but a cognitive digital twin. So they really pushed the boundaries here
[280.3s - 287.2s] for, well, let's say from simple data repos to a functional cognitive model that can predict
[287.3s - 292.6s] future EI directions offering here. And this is now the interesting part of a blueprint for an
[292.6s - 298.0s] automatic scientific discovery. And it's not going to be that simple as we have read here in the
[298.0s - 305.0s] last publications. So I said, let's start here with our little tiny EI revolution and let's have a
[305.0s - 313.4s] look. Now, Chingwa tells us, so we have here now the individual level, the human, the singular
[313.4s - 318.7s] human level. Now we look at the memory structure. And they decide everything that we had up until
[318.7s - 325.8s] now was not enough. So they go now with an episodic layer of memory with a semantic layer of memory
[325.8s - 333.0s] and a persona layer. And one layer built upon the other and then we built a gravity well. We built
[333.0s - 339.8s] here a force field if you want with very specific features. And this is then our first manifold
[339.8s - 346.4s] for our dual manifold branding. So let's have a look. They start and they say, okay, you know,
[346.4s - 351.8s] the basic is here the episodic memory, you know, all the raw papers, all the facts, everything
[351.8s - 357.8s] that you have, the PDF, I don't know, the latest 1000 medical PDFs or the latest 10,000
[357.8s - 365.0s] publication and theoretical physics. Then we go for an semantic memory. But we do have in,
[365.5s - 372.2s] if you want, evolving narrative that is now developing of a single person of the author's research
[372.2s - 379.0s] trajectory. Now, if we go for an individual level, we restrict this here to one person and we just
[379.0s - 384.7s] look at the temporal distillation pipeline of this single person. What is the author written in the
[384.7s - 389.5s] first month? What has the author written in the second month? Then we go through all the 12 months,
[389.6s - 396.5s] we have yearly summaries here and we want to answer how did they thinking evolved of a single
[396.5s - 405.2s] scientist, not just what he has published. So whenever you know, give here an LLAM or any I
[405.2s - 412.4s] system that has computer use access to your files and your local desktop laptop, whatever you
[412.4s - 419.3s] have. Now this is great because now all those data become available every email, every file that
[419.3s - 425.5s] you worked on, every if you prepared your PhD or your prepared any publication. How many
[425.5s - 431.3s] month have you been working on this? How many version of the final paper are stored in your
[431.3s - 438.3s] directories? Now, if any I would have access to this, it would be really able to map your personal
[438.3s - 447.0s] or my personal thinking process, my mental if you want, evolvement here, how I understand this topic.
[447.8s - 453.4s] And if we are able to bring this here into a temporal pipeline, we can distill further
[453.4s - 460.1s] insights. And then if you have this information, let's say of my persona, we have now an agent
[460.1s - 467.3s] or an LLAM that can build now my persona schema with all my knowledge about mathematics,
[467.3s - 474.4s] theoretical physics, whatever. So we can build now an abstraction, a dynamic concept network,
[474.4s - 481.6s] capturing now my let's say also stylistic, but also my reasoning preferences, all my knowledge
[481.6s - 488.4s] is now mapped to an AI system. Plus we have everything timeline stamped. So we have here, as you see
[488.4s - 493.8s] here in the semantic layer, perfect time series going on for month or even years, depending how much
[493.8s - 501.0s] data you have on your computer. So they say, okay, let's start with the individual person and
[501.0s - 507.0s] let's build this. Let's do this. Let's follow their traces. Okay, the episodic memory
[507.0s - 514.2s] of the series is here, the very last layer at the bottom. What is it? We have now what they call
[514.2s - 520.6s] a dual index structure to handle the specificity of the scientific terminology. Now, I didn't know
[520.6s - 527.0s] about you, but in theoretical physics, we have real long technical terms, also in astrophysics,
[527.0s - 532.3s] long technical terms, in high energy physics, elementary particle physics, long technical
[532.3s - 539.7s] terms, thing about medicine, long Latin terms, thing about pharmacology. You understand immediately.
[539.7s - 545.4s] You are not allowed to make one single type mistake. So you cannot give this to an LLM. So what
[545.4s - 551.0s] do you do? You build a hybrid regga engine. Of course, our good old friend, the reg machine.
[551.7s - 559.3s] But now the reg documents are paused into semantically coherent chunks. So what we do now is we have
[559.3s - 564.2s] a certain chunk. Let's say a sentence or maybe if I have a complete paragraph, it's a very homogenous
[564.2s - 571.0s] paragraph, then we have to source document. This is in file number, whatever from and we have a
[571.0s - 576.6s] timestamp. So exactly here, the recording when did I, when did I write down the standards on
[576.6s - 580.7s] my computer or when did I publish it or when did I just cast it, when send it out in an email
[580.7s - 587.8s] to my friends, exactly timestamp here, the complexity of a topic. Now, if you do this for
[587.8s - 594.2s] million and millions and millions of chunk IDs, you got no idea where we are. And may
[594.2s - 598.7s] remind you order say, hmm, you know what? We looked at all the vector search capabilities
[598.7s - 605.1s] and they are often too fuzzy for real science. And so what we have to do, we have specific
[605.3s - 611.4s] acronyms or chemical formulas, they all must be exact. You can't go with an LLM that just has a
[611.4s - 617.6s] probability distribution here for the next token prediction. So therefore we will choose not an LLM
[617.6s - 622.8s] but something different. So now they went with the episodic memory, the stores, every chunk of
[622.8s - 628.0s] information they found, let's say on my computer here, in two parallel searchable indexes.
[628.6s - 632.9s] And the first is a dense vector index. This is what you know, this is a high dimensional
[632.9s - 639.8s] embedding via here the encoder model of a transformer for the conceptual similarities.
[639.8s - 645.4s] So we build a new mathematical vector space and we say, okay, given our dissimantic
[645.4s - 651.8s] similarity of my, let's say 100 files and the content of these files, we can now place the
[651.8s - 657.9s] vectors here in the new vector space and we can arrange those vectors that we do have conceptual
[657.9s - 664.5s] similarity of the technical terms. But talking about technical terms, we now store them separately
[664.5s - 671.4s] because we say, hmm, we use now a sparse inverted index. So this is a standard BM25 index for an
[671.4s - 677.8s] underlying exact, exact, laxical matching. So we have absolute the keywords, the symbols, the
[677.8s - 683.0s] technical term that we have and they go in a separate index. So there's no mixing up and there's
[683.0s - 688.1s] no hallucination by any LLM. We cannot afford this in physics or chemistry or medicine.
[689.5s - 697.0s] And then, since we have now two specific scientific indexes, we can merge the result via a rank
[697.0s - 703.6s] fusion, a reciprocal rank fusion. And this is the way they set up here the episodic memory
[703.6s - 708.6s] of a single researcher. So this is here all the scientific content over the last five years that
[708.7s - 715.2s] I have here, let's say on my laptop. Right. The next step is here the semantic layer, as you can
[715.2s - 721.5s] see, you know, the semantic memory builds on the episodic layer and performs what they call now
[721.5s - 727.3s] a cognitive distillation. If you're familiar with map reviews from the very early days of EI,
[727.3s - 732.1s] you know exactly what we're looking at. Map reviews this deal pipeline. This is all there is.
[732.1s - 738.3s] So let's see, they use any LLM to transform them. Now all the definition from the
[738.3s - 744.1s] episodic layer come up. And now just give you an example. I say, analyze the cognitive evolution
[744.1s - 751.5s] focus on any moderation of ideas of this stupid human, any conceptual shift that you can detect here
[751.5s - 756.6s] on all the hundred and thousand files on his notebook or any changes in the research focus of
[756.6s - 762.6s] this personal or the methodology he uses. Or why suddenly in, I don't know, April 19, I decided
[762.6s - 767.4s] to go from a particular branch of mathematics to a more complex branch of mathematics because
[767.4s - 773.8s] the complexity of my problem suddenly increase. And LLM should now distill from all the episodic
[773.8s - 781.9s] layer elements with the timestamp here. As you see here, the map reduce pipeline. And if we have
[781.9s - 786.6s] this information, you know what we're going to build, we're going to build a trajectory. As you see
[786.6s - 794.5s] here, we have a trajectory of time of trends of keywords, topics here, whatever clusters you can
[794.5s - 800.0s] define your clusters, if you're particular looking for some quantum field theoretical subtopics
[800.0s - 805.7s] here. So you see exactly how my knowledge evolved here over the last five years, and I have to
[805.7s - 811.9s] nothing, I just give you my laptop and this is it. Now, they model a cognitive trajectory. So they
[811.9s - 818.4s] say now we distill not as semantics. So the system now understands the reasoning link that I had in
[818.5s - 826.2s] my mind between paper, I published a file, a on my laptop under the file B. So what it does,
[826.2s - 832.5s] it captures now, and what they call the cognitive inertia of my intellectual topics.
[834.7s - 838.9s] Now, this is interesting. You see, we have now a five year timeline of my scientific work.
[838.9s - 844.2s] We have nine, the semantically at a complete time series. And guess what we do next?
[844.4s - 851.2s] Yeah, if you want to very simply find explanation, think of a semantic memory as a biograph,
[852.0s - 856.6s] AI system. Now, look, so everything that I published on my computer and says, okay,
[856.6s - 862.3s] there's this fellow. Oh, no, there's no way he's doing science now. So trends isolated time
[862.3s - 870.5s] stem into a cohesive intellectual history. And if we have this, the next step is, of course,
[870.5s - 876.1s] and you already guessed it, we have now a mathematical transformation. We have now the next step
[876.1s - 883.6s] and we go to the persona layer. Now, I am modeled in my, what do I call this, scientific intellectual
[885.0s - 891.6s] development. We are now here transforming this here from a temporal flow from the time series
[891.6s - 896.4s] into a topological structure. And the simplest topological structure that we know is here,
[896.4s - 902.9s] knowledge graph with specific weights here. So we have here particular focus on some topics
[902.9s - 908.6s] and I'm going to explain what I mean in a second. The simplest way to explain this is with an
[908.6s - 915.4s] example. Let's see, the input signal now entering here, the persona layer is now, let's say in 2023,
[915.4s - 921.1s] the order moved away from his CNN's convolutional neural networks and started focusing heavily on
[921.2s - 926.4s] graph neural networks. Now, you know, this is not true because we did this in 2021 to get on this
[926.4s - 931.8s] channel, but just to be here on the safe side, it's just an example. And we did this for more
[931.8s - 937.4s] like color modeling, see my videos from 2021. Okay, great. So what we do now with this.
[940.2s - 944.5s] The system now understands looking here at the centers that comes up from the semantic layer,
[944.5s - 948.2s] and says, okay, we have to create some nodes. Now we have to build a topological structure. Let's
[948.3s - 955.2s] have here knowledge graph. So what is new? We have here CNN's, we have here the GNN's and we have
[955.2s - 961.8s] molecular and we have modeling. So let's build this. Now, particular of interest is of course the
[961.8s - 968.6s] quality of the nodes. GNN's are not just a subtopic, but it's a main and major topic. No graph,
[968.6s - 974.1s] neural networks. So it becomes a concept node. Moleicles, there are thousands and millions of
[974.1s - 979.4s] different molecules. So it becomes a concept node again. So you see, we already introduced here
[979.4s - 988.2s] kind of a hierarchical structure in our knowledge graph. And now we have here a certain wing
[988.2s - 994.2s] that we're going to do because it might decay or lower now the centrality. This is a graph
[994.2s - 1000.1s] theoretical feature that I explained in one of my videos of the particular nodes here. And because
[1000.1s - 1007.4s] it is stated falsely that in 2023 and it was 2021 that I moved away from CNN's. So currently
[1008.0s - 1016.8s] the centrality, the importance here on all the sub-nets here of my graph, CNN's are somewhere
[1016.8s - 1024.3s] lower in the importance. No, they're not as important right now. They calculate this with the
[1024.9s - 1030.4s] centrality measures. And if we have this and here you see it here, the persona layer,
[1030.4s - 1035.7s] this is not my profile. I have a profile, a machine learning. These are my sub topics. I studied,
[1035.7s - 1041.1s] I learned, I published, I wrote code. I did not publish and just have on my computer, whatever.
[1041.1s - 1046.1s] And then we have something in bioinformatics to work. I've done done something whatever,
[1046.1s - 1051.2s] other topic you have. How strong are the interlinks? How strong are the edges between these
[1051.3s - 1057.8s] topics? So we build a knowledge of my temporal scientific evolution as a scientist.
[1059.5s - 1065.5s] But you are not happy with this, because we are going to map this further. So in this step,
[1065.5s - 1071.3s] we mapped it from the temporal flow of the semantic layer of the time series into a topological structure.
[1071.3s - 1077.8s] But this topological structure is not really the word we can have a smooth transition and inter-gurls.
[1078.2s - 1083.4s] This is a graph. Come on, this is bulky. This is not elegant. So what we're going to build is a
[1083.4s - 1088.5s] gravity well. We're going to build a field representation. This is here the blue heat map that
[1088.5s - 1095.8s] you see on top. And this shifts now the sender. Let's say somewhere, there was G&N. Now shifts
[1095.8s - 1103.4s] here the sender here to G&N. So you see, we have a lot of mapping here to have here the
[1103.4s - 1109.6s] internal individual, my personal evolution. But this is not all done by the eye.
[1111.0s - 1116.6s] So now the eye says, okay, let's do some inference. Now it looks like the new topology of the graph
[1116.6s - 1124.0s] and ask, given this new shape, what kind of scientist is this person now? If I don't know,
[1124.0s - 1129.3s] some AI says, okay, who is this person that does hear all these beautiful YouTube videos?
[1130.1s - 1137.0s] What is now his actual current characteristics? And now the system might update here if it's working
[1137.0s - 1143.0s] now for me, the system prompt in a way that it says now him, okay, listen, if you work with this guy
[1143.5s - 1149.9s] as an AI, your style has to be highly theoretical based on first principle reasoning.
[1150.6s - 1157.2s] So you see, all of this just took a rive at this simple sentence as that, the eye has now a perfect
[1157.2s - 1163.7s] characteristic of my actual learning experience, understanding what I know, what I do not know,
[1163.7s - 1169.9s] and now the AI is the perfect intellectual sparing partner for me. Now the CI system is the perfect
[1169.9s - 1176.9s] professional AI companion for theoretical physics, for bioinformatics or whatever. So what we have
[1176.9s - 1184.9s] achieved is not only build me as a perfect mirror mind for the eye to understand, but the eye
[1184.9s - 1193.2s] can now decide to find the perfect complement to my intellectual morphism. So it is the perfect
[1193.2s - 1199.4s] partner for me to have here an augmentation here of our an acceleration of the research.
[1200.7s - 1204.2s] Now you can look at this of course from a mathematical point of view and say, why was this
[1204.2s - 1210.4s] necessary? I mean, look at this, we went through a four different mapping. Why? Well,
[1210.5s - 1217.2s] Adolams cannot calculate a similarity against a story against my learning. They can calculate it
[1217.2s - 1221.9s] against a vector or a graph state. It is a simple mathematical operation. And now by converting
[1221.9s - 1227.8s] the trajectory into a weighted graph, the system can now mathematically compute, hey, if I get a new
[1227.8s - 1235.4s] idea, how close is this to the current network to the current, if you want gravity value here
[1235.4s - 1240.1s] after what we call this scientific intellectual capacity of this person.
[1242.5s - 1249.0s] Now we can calculate it. And then if we can calculate it, we can code it in Python C++, whatever you
[1249.0s - 1255.4s] like. Now I have been already talking here about this gravity value. And I just call it a gravity
[1255.4s - 1259.5s] value, call it whatever you like it. But it's just important that you understand the idea.
[1260.1s - 1264.6s] What is it? And now if we change the framing, we look at it from a little bit more of a mathematical
[1264.6s - 1270.6s] perspective, you immediately see it's a probability density field that we derive from the topology
[1270.6s - 1276.6s] of the persona graph. Persona graph allows us this mapping here into a n-dimensional gravity value.
[1278.2s - 1285.3s] So how we do this? I mean, how can you have just a stupid graph, a flat planner graph,
[1286.1s - 1289.5s] and suddenly you have a three-dimensional beauty of a manifold?
[1290.5s - 1296.2s] You ought to tell us the way they decided to go. So here they say, okay, first the system calculates
[1296.2s - 1303.4s] the mass of every existing node in our network. And we are in mind determines the mass using here
[1303.4s - 1310.7s] a particular graph-specific centrality measure. This is the way they determine now the mass of
[1310.7s - 1316.6s] every node, or if you would say the importance of, mean, the current temporal
[1316.6s - 1321.9s] involvement of my scientific knowledge. And then they define also the distance.
[1322.7s - 1328.1s] The distance you notice is of course, and then by the space one minus cosine similarity beautiful.
[1328.1s - 1334.1s] If we go here for an Euclidean simple distance, I have later we are going to discuss some other
[1334.1s - 1342.2s] hypothetical spaces, then it becomes a little bit more difficult. Now this blue gravity well is,
[1342.2s - 1349.0s] let's go to the next step of abstraction, a kernel density estimation over the embedding space
[1349.0s - 1355.0s] of the persona graph. Now I have multiple videos here on this kernel density estimation,
[1355.0s - 1362.0s] but in summary, you can say that the gravity intensity G at a point Q here in my blue gravity field,
[1362.6s - 1368.2s] and let's say Q is now a new idea, is the sum of the influences of all the nodes in the graph,
[1369.2s - 1373.8s] exponentially decaying with distance. I mean, this is the simplest thing you can think of,
[1373.8s - 1378.6s] right? Everything has to contribute to this, but we have an exponential decay function so that
[1378.6s - 1383.6s] not everything is contributing here in equal matters here to this particular, that the points
[1383.6s - 1388.6s] are the closest are the most influential. I mean, it couldn't be easy, you know? And here we have
[1388.6s - 1394.9s] this simple formula that the students here, the experts here from Jinghua University, show us.
[1395.0s - 1402.1s] Great. So what did you do? This deep blue visualizes not a specific region of a, let's call it a
[1402.1s - 1408.8s] latent space, where the outer fields, or I feel most comfortable, you see here in this dark here,
[1408.8s - 1415.0s] I called it more of the same. This is my expertise. This is what I know is exceptional,
[1415.0s - 1421.4s] need well to do. I've worked the last two years only on this dark area here in this gravity well.
[1421.4s - 1429.3s] Those are my topics. This is I know well. But of course, if I want to have a brand new discovery,
[1429.3s - 1435.5s] now they argue, hmm, maybe it is not exactly in the same old thing that you do for two years,
[1435.5s - 1439.3s] because otherwise you would have discovered it. So maybe there's somewhere else.
[1441.0s - 1446.3s] And they say now, okay, so what we have to do now is find a mathematical algorithm,
[1446.3s - 1453.4s] a repulsive force that acts on this, if you want gravity well structure, to bring me out of my
[1453.4s - 1461.5s] minimum over the mountains and somewhere beautiful new. So what I need is a novelty repulsor.
[1462.2s - 1468.6s] I have to have a force acting on me sitting here, boring and doing the same thing over and over again,
[1468.6s - 1475.5s] and not this carrying anything new. So push me out here of this and let's go somewhere we have
[1475.5s - 1483.6s] never been before. So you see, it wants here to simulate here the discovery, not the repetition.
[1483.6s - 1489.4s] Repetition is done in the blue. And therefore the algorithm treats here my order persona graph,
[1489.4s - 1496.6s] not as a target to hit, but it is exactly the negative, as a penalty zone to avoid. Now the
[1496.6s - 1500.8s] thing becomes interesting because yeah, you can push me out with any force out of here my stable
[1500.8s - 1506.2s] position at a minimum, but in what direction do you push me, where should I go and continue my
[1506.2s - 1513.3s] research on. And now, think about this covers here, where says, well, what we have is the second
[1513.3s - 1520.6s] manifold is an external manifold. And this external manifold is here, let's say here open Alex.
[1520.6s - 1525.8s] So this is the knowledge of all, I don't know, one million published paper in my topics that I
[1525.8s - 1531.8s] research on, it's a free and open source database of scholar research paper, author, institution,
[1531.8s - 1536.6s] everything is there. And let's say, okay, this is not the outside world. This is not a second
[1536.6s - 1543.6s] manifold. This is here my personal manifold. And this is here the community manifold in total,
[1543.6s - 1549.4s] the global science community, where they are, what they have done, what their examine, where do you
[1550.4s - 1556.8s] feel. And they say, let's do this. And they build now simple idea, a wireframe grid. So you don't
[1556.8s - 1562.4s] have to build a real a smooth manifold, a wireframe grid is enough. You just have some estimation points
[1562.4s - 1568.7s] and you can connect this net in the, in real, isn't it? So what do we add here to my stupidity here
[1568.7s - 1574.2s] on the left side in the blue valley here? We add if you want a social connection to my social
[1574.2s - 1580.2s] community, this is here, the research community from astrophysics and some new ideas might come from
[1580.2s - 1586.9s] astronomy, some new idea might come from medicine, whatever. So we have now from simple
[1586.9s - 1594.2s] approach here to an interdisciplinary approach. So we have here now one manifold, the second manifold,
[1594.2s - 1599.4s] and the second manifold is also constructed that we clearly can detect hallucination. Because if
[1599.5s - 1606.8s] the LLM suddenly does some hallucination, we can pocket him here into this rabbit hole and say,
[1606.8s - 1612.7s] okay, let's forget about this hole. What we are interested here is the maximum of the community
[1612.7s - 1618.7s] knowledge. Can I contribute with my knowledge here to the open problem started here at the top
[1618.7s - 1624.8s] of the mountain here, this particular sweet spot? And you see, told you a force has to push me out,
[1624.8s - 1631.0s] and this is not a path to optimal research, an optimal research idea P star.
[1632.2s - 1639.4s] As easy as can be. And again, thank you to my nano banana pro, because about 20 minutes, it took me
[1639.4s - 1644.3s] that I put all the data in, I said, hey, this play the summary, I want this and this position
[1644.3s - 1650.3s] over there. And it just, it just did it. There was not one mistake here. Okay.
[1650.5s - 1658.9s] Now, this is now the story, this is my story, no, it's a scientist. But now, of course, we have to
[1658.9s - 1664.0s] code this. So if you want to code this, we have to work with agents, we have to work with LLM,
[1664.0s - 1668.2s] we have to work with networks, we have to work with different mathematical operations,
[1668.2s - 1674.6s] like mapping functions, so let's do this now. Okay. So what we have is the order say,
[1674.7s - 1681.2s] so we need to have a super, I know we have an interdisciplinary level where the super
[1681.2s - 1688.4s] coordinator agent is supervising everything notices the mastermind. And this coordinator agent
[1688.4s - 1695.9s] decomposes now an incoming query and roots them to particular domain agents that are navigating
[1695.9s - 1702.7s] here the open Alex concept graphs or building the graphs or the author agents that understand,
[1702.7s - 1709.0s] now my scientific personality, no? So the system solves now proposing complementarity
[1709.0s - 1715.7s] or ideas as a dual constraint optimization. I have both manifolds and in both manifolds,
[1715.7s - 1720.8s] I have constrained. And now I have to do a dual constraint optimization process in mathematics.
[1721.3s - 1729.1s] Couldn't be easier, no? It is just the perfect path. Let's do this. So the idea is, or if you want to,
[1729.9s - 1737.2s] optimal idea that I'm as a researcher looking for, P-Star, is forced to exist in the Goldilocks
[1737.2s - 1742.6s] zone right on the Ramzer. It has to be valid science that is accepted by the scientific community,
[1743.3s - 1748.7s] but also real close to my particular areas of expertise, so what I'm as an author,
[1749.5s - 1755.8s] almost developed, but almost thought of, but I just didn't do this little tiny baby step.
[1755.8s - 1763.8s] So what we are going for is the easy wins. The I would analyze, hmm, this particular guy here
[1763.8s - 1769.4s] with his YouTube channel, he did some research here and he was almost there to discover something
[1769.4s - 1776.3s] that the community also indicated there might be some new element. So let's tell him, hey, go in this
[1776.3s - 1782.4s] direction, learn this and this and this, and then you will make a significant step in your
[1782.4s - 1790.1s] knowledge and discover a new element. So this is now, and now I need a little bit feedback from
[1790.1s - 1796.6s] my viewers, because I'm now trying to accelerate my learning, but at the same time, I'm trying to
[1796.6s - 1803.4s] accelerate my understanding of a visualization so I can communicate better with you, my viewers,
[1803.4s - 1808.4s] my subscribers, and you're the members of my channel. And this is the first time I really
[1808.4s - 1815.5s] invested heavily into the visuals here with Nanobanana Pro, for example, to build a visualization
[1815.5s - 1824.0s] of a complex tier rim that is more than 4050, 100 papers and I try to bring it here just on one
[1824.8s - 1831.6s] simple image. It is not easy, but I will try this if you as my viewer, you'll like it and you have
[1831.7s - 1841.7s] this additional visualization. So mirror mind here and the next paper, what we call person-agent,
[1841.7s - 1846.8s] demonstrate now that the vector databases here are simply insufficient for complex reasoning.
[1847.4s - 1853.4s] But what we need, we need more complex graph structure and mapping from graph to graph
[1853.4s - 1859.3s] to represent new and established relations between the different memories. And in mirror mind,
[1859.3s - 1862.3s] I showed you the temporal evolution of my scientific mind.
[1865.3s - 1872.0s] Now, if you have a closer look at this, especially the semantic memory now, it explicitly models how
[1872.0s - 1879.5s] a scientist's mind changes. But you know, understand what is happening now? We break with one of the most
[1879.5s - 1885.1s] important theorems that we had in artificial intelligence. And this was that everything is a
[1885.1s - 1891.8s] macovian system. And suddenly, it is not that I just can look at the system and say, this is the
[1891.8s - 1899.4s] current state of the system. And it is not depending on the history. Because now that you mirror a
[1899.4s - 1906.4s] human brain, a human mind, it is very well-depending on my personal history, where I started to learn
[1906.4s - 1912.0s] mathematics, then physics, then whatever. And then, you know, bit by bit, I'm a little bit better here.
[1912.6s - 1918.6s] You have to understand here the time evolution. So suddenly, we break with a macovian state.
[1920.2s - 1926.6s] This means that all algorithms that we have in LLM also break and become invalid, inoperable.
[1927.7s - 1930.6s] So now these things become really interesting.
[1933.4s - 1939.0s] And now you might ask, hey, I'm just here to learn how to code an agent. Do agents do any of those
[1939.0s - 1944.4s] operations you are asking for? Are you doing? And I say, it's so glad that you ask this question.
[1944.4s - 1949.8s] No, because now I can tell you about the multi-agent interact on pattern here in the work done
[1949.8s - 1956.3s] with the coding here by Jinghua University. And I want to focus here on the multi-agent cognitive
[1956.3s - 1963.6s] engine. As I told you, we have here an interdisciplinary coordinator here, our super-yide understands
[1963.6s - 1967.3s] everything can sort everything can plan everything can execute everything great.
[1968.2s - 1975.6s] So what it does, it gets in here my human query. Hey, I don't know, find me the next research topic
[1975.6s - 1979.4s] because I'm as a human. I'm too stupid to know where I want to go for two.
[1979.9s - 1985.4s] Okay, so this here I says, okay, I signed out two query vectors. I send a query vector now to,
[1986.1s - 1991.7s] you know, now I exchanged here the manifold. This is here my human learning manifold on the right side.
[1992.3s - 1998.2s] And on the left side, they sent here the same query vector in an embedding here in a mathematical
[1998.2s - 2005.0s] tensor structure now to the other side. And this is here the objective visibility, so all the
[2005.0s - 2010.3s] hundred thousand of research paper that are now suddenly in the brain of any system. Of course,
[2010.3s - 2015.0s] so this is the collective domain of theoretical physics of medicine. You got the idea.
[2015.6s - 2020.5s] But let's say we have here built a holographic wireframe wall. So this is my idea. Please
[2021.3s - 2026.6s] go with whatever you like. This is just an illustration. I try to find to explain this area to you.
[2026.6s - 2032.0s] And let's say we have here a domain agent. And the domain agent is just reading every day here,
[2032.0s - 2037.2s] the latest AI research publication that has to do anything with theoretical physics. And then we
[2037.2s - 2042.6s] have here an agent. This is reading here every single scientific paper that has to do with biology.
[2043.5s - 2049.4s] And they built here their internal representation and their network here, their wireframe here,
[2049.8s - 2055.4s] after complexity of the topics of the dependencies here in science. Great. So if you want,
[2055.4s - 2059.7s] we have here the domain knowledge graph of physics combined with biology.
[2061.4s - 2065.6s] And now the query vector comes in. This is a very specific query vector with a brand new idea.
[2066.2s - 2073.8s] And this is now, hey, does the general global research community as ever heard of this idea that I
[2074.6s - 2079.7s] how I should develop as a human? Is there anything related to it? Is there any publication that
[2079.7s - 2085.7s] gives me a help? Is there any publication that guides me in my personal development? Anybody
[2085.7s - 2091.4s] has tried something crazy enough or similar enough. And now we are again working with a cosine
[2091.4s - 2097.7s] similarity in a normal vector space. You see, explore the space and says, yeah, we found some
[2097.7s - 2102.7s] path of augmentation that your idea is not as stupid as you think, but maybe it's a valid idea.
[2102.7s - 2108.4s] And we provide now from the complete, if you want knowledge graph of the world,
[2109.2s - 2115.8s] we provide now the particular output here. This is the green beam. We provide now as an output.
[2115.8s - 2121.2s] But at the same time, of course, this query vector was sent here to my personal learning manifold.
[2122.6s - 2128.7s] Now, I told you I have a repellent force field here. Now, this is an orange here.
[2128.8s - 2134.7s] But I do not want that if this square vector comes in, it is already the same as I've already
[2134.7s - 2139.9s] doing. So more of the same, I don't want this. I want to go here for a scientific discovery,
[2139.9s - 2145.4s] go where no one has ever gone before and you know the story. Now, so if this vector here
[2145.4s - 2150.4s] crashes through my force field, it has to have a certain, let's call it impulse impetus.
[2151.0s - 2156.3s] And then I will analyze this. Now, and I just explained to this here all the different layers here
[2156.3s - 2164.2s] of the individual personality of my mirror mind. And now I now discover is this something,
[2164.2s - 2170.6s] is this an idea that would push me out of my deep blue gravity well into a new direction.
[2171.9s - 2175.8s] And I send out, hey, yeah, this sounds absolutely interesting. This is absolutely normal.
[2175.8s - 2183.4s] T I have my experience in the topic A, B and C. And now I say, hey, this is my specialization.
[2183.4s - 2189.7s] I have sent out the orange beam to novelty. So now we have here the knowledge integrator,
[2189.7s - 2196.1s] which is something beautiful. This is now where the braiding is going to happen. We combine now the
[2196.1s - 2202.2s] green beam and the orange beam into something completely new and the output of this will be my new
[2202.2s - 2207.7s] research direction, my new research title, where I should move to have a scientific discovery as
[2207.8s - 2215.1s] decided by the AI system. Oh, wow. Okay, let's go with this. I hope I'm clear as
[2216.2s - 2222.0s] or as right now. If not, I just want to give you an example. How does it work? Let's say we have
[2222.0s - 2227.7s] the idea, hey, let's build a narrow morphic battery. No, battery is always our topic on case. So
[2228.2s - 2234.4s] how is now the flow diagram? Now, we have a coordinated HN and takes in here my crazy idea,
[2234.4s - 2240.2s] building here an our morphic battery. So the coordinated AI say, okay, I activate now an
[2240.2s - 2245.8s] auto agent to or already if I'm already mapped in the system, if not, you can build here.
[2245.8s - 2252.5s] Your auto agent, if you say, hey, build me, yeah, you get the idea. And a domain agent for biology.
[2252.5s - 2259.3s] Great. So if you want, this is me and then here we have here agent here for biology. Great.
[2259.8s - 2265.4s] Activates and creates here agents. Then your agent, the individual, if you want person,
[2265.4s - 2271.4s] builds now our excesses, I have has access to your persona graph to the history, whatever I've
[2271.4s - 2277.4s] already researched and cut out and electrolytes in voltage fade, all the constraints here and do
[2277.4s - 2283.4s] whatever I do every Tuesday that I build better cathodes. Okay. So I say, don't go there because
[2283.4s - 2288.2s] this is what he is already doing and it has not having any discovery at all. So he pushes me away
[2288.3s - 2295.2s] from those areas that I already do. Then the domain agent, if you want to collective agent here,
[2295.2s - 2301.0s] we're guarding biology looks now at all the publication, the biology concepts related to energy.
[2302.2s - 2307.8s] Finds here neural glia cells, the concept to ion regulation here returns now. Yeah, there's
[2307.8s - 2313.4s] something like ion regulation biology to an electric light transport in batteries. Maybe there's
[2313.4s - 2318.8s] some hidden patterns here in the understanding and the reasoning in the, I don't know, molecular
[2318.8s - 2325.5s] transport architecture that we can use now from biology now in battery technology. And then comes
[2325.5s - 2330.2s] here the cooperation phase, the optimization as a studio in the blue well. The coordinator asks,
[2330.2s - 2335.1s] hey, is this a valid path? The domain agent says yes, but I mean, actually I showed here reading
[2335.1s - 2341.2s] here 50,000 publication that we have here. The other agents say I've never mentioned glia cells
[2341.3s - 2346.7s] in my last 50 paper. So this now for me is a complete new topic, but a new everything about
[2346.7s - 2353.0s] science. No, I just never focused on this particular point of research. So let me do this.
[2353.4s - 2359.4s] And then it scores here a novelty score and they try to maximize the novelty score. So the
[2359.4s - 2367.2s] eyes are not going to give me a brand new topic. And the integrator now generates it a final output.
[2367.5s - 2372.5s] And the integrator says, hmm, after having looked at all the AI research paper and what have you
[2372.5s - 2379.2s] learned in your last 18 years, I give you now a proposal, design a self regulating electorate
[2379.2s - 2385.0s] gale that mimics an ion buffering capacity of a neural glia cell to prevent voltage spikes.
[2386.0s - 2393.6s] This is your topic. This is your PhD. Do it if you solve it. You gonna spend or an millions of
[2393.6s - 2398.5s] dollars. Right. Yeah, you're gonna spend millions of dollars too for a computer button. Now I'm
[2398.5s - 2405.0s] mind about this. But it was the first paper. And I know I told you, I want to accelerate my learning.
[2405.0s - 2409.4s] I want to accelerate my explanation and we can go in higher complexity because now with nano banana
[2409.4s - 2416.3s] pro, hopefully I have a tool to to to show you my ideas, how I see things and maybe it becomes
[2416.3s - 2421.2s] clear to you or say, Hey, buddy, no way what you are thinking. So let's increase here the speed,
[2421.2s - 2427.0s] let's increase here the acceleration. And let's go to another paper. And you see I place it here
[2427.0s - 2432.2s] and this is also a paper by November 21st. This is here from Purdue University, our state
[2432.2s - 2438.5s] University, Columbia University. And they have a topic pair zone agents with graphrag.
[2438.5s - 2443.4s] Our good old friend graphrag. So what they build is a community of their knowledge graph for
[2443.4s - 2450.7s] personalized LLM. And you might think this sounds real similar to what we just did. All of course,
[2450.7s - 2455.4s] what coincidence that I selected this paper, but we published on the very same date.
[2456.7s - 2462.2s] Okay, they tell us just is this raw reading? They say, Hey, our method improves the data
[2462.2s - 2468.1s] organization here that if one score by 11% and for the movie tagging is now improved by 56%
[2468.1s - 2474.5s] and I say, Okay, if this is the step in the improvement, if we use this, let's have a look at this paper.
[2475.0s - 2484.1s] So, persona agents. So let's say you want to build here the little Einstein. No problem.
[2484.1s - 2490.7s] So you ought to see our tell us, Okay, our framework generates personalized prompts now for any
[2490.7s - 2497.0s] eye systems by combining here a summary of the user's historical behavior. Let's take again
[2497.0s - 2502.1s] me as a user. So my historical behavior and the preferences extracted from the knowledge graph. So
[2502.1s - 2507.6s] what I'm doing, so if I have multiple AI systems from I don't know, and tropic, open AI, and Google,
[2507.6s - 2512.9s] and to meter and Microsoft on my computer and all of those AI have access to my complete computer
[2512.9s - 2518.6s] and to my complete documentation. Everybody has my data. Great. So what did you do it? And then we
[2518.6s - 2524.5s] have a mixture and then we have also the global interaction patterns that we see, let's see on social
[2524.5s - 2531.5s] media, all the scientific publication and who is referencing what other paper. So we have to
[2531.5s - 2537.4s] complete social interaction. Let's go only on the science level. And this can be identified
[2537.4s - 2543.4s] through a graph based community detection. So social media. We bring it all together. We have
[2543.4s - 2549.2s] to compute power. No problem. No problem at all. Let's go with the complete science community.
[2549.2s - 2555.3s] And let's build here with this user history who is definitely not an Einstein. How can he become
[2556.2s - 2563.1s] a simple topic now? So they tell us here and this is not mine, not a banana, but this is done here
[2563.1s - 2569.0s] by the orders here. You see here that it's not as beautiful. They say we have a user profile
[2569.0s - 2573.5s] construction. And I would explain everything to you. You know, I have a personal preferences,
[2573.5s - 2578.4s] the relevant concept, the interaction statistics of me, all the emails who I talked to,
[2578.4s - 2583.0s] I cooperate with who might publish what paper, and then they have the external knowledge graph
[2583.8s - 2587.2s] construction. So what is happening to currently in quantum field theory and theoretical physics
[2587.2s - 2592.2s] in computational science, all the interaction node, the concept nodes, concepts we all were
[2592.2s - 2597.7s] encountered. No, then they have category theoretical physics, mathematics, biology, whatever.
[2597.7s - 2602.2s] You know, and then all the semantic relations, remember the co-sense similarity in a normalized
[2602.2s - 2606.9s] vector space. So we have to use the data in a community data and then we bring them all together
[2606.9s - 2614.2s] in a mixer and then we have a personalized agent that is now almost a substitute for this human,
[2614.2s - 2618.8s] but the personalized agent we can develop much faster. No, this will become a machine that is
[2618.8s - 2623.5s] much more intelligent than a human user. This is me, by the way. So what would be, we build a
[2623.5s - 2628.2s] semantic memory and say, Hey, I noticed you just talked about this and said, yeah, of course.
[2628.2s - 2632.4s] And then we need an episodic memory and say, Hey, this was the first layer, yes, of course.
[2632.4s - 2635.8s] And then we have a community context and I said, what is the surprise? So you see,
[2636.7s - 2642.4s] complete different place at the very same day, they published something that is almost identical.
[2643.0s - 2650.6s] And they now generate here a personalized prompt to then they feed to the LAM to get a real
[2650.6s - 2656.8s] highly specialized personalized response. Now, the beauty of what they do is they work only
[2656.8s - 2663.8s] with graph rack. So they are not going here with BM25 or with some dense algorithm. They are here
[2663.8s - 2669.3s] on the graph level. They're operational only on the graph level. Real nice. So let's go there.
[2670.0s - 2676.1s] So we have now from a graph topology, what we want is the output in a linearized context here for
[2676.1s - 2681.9s] a stupid LAM. If you want, this is here the braiding mechanism that was already talking about.
[2681.9s - 2688.5s] And here again, word, coincidence, I ask here nano banana pro to generate here almost identical
[2688.5s - 2695.3s] image here for our braiding process for our machine that brings here everything together.
[2696.6s - 2701.7s] Okay, let's start. So what we have again, as I told you, we have now we start not with the
[2701.7s - 2707.3s] three levels of memory, but we are now operating here in a graph rack system. So we have here a graph
[2707.3s - 2714.2s] and this graph, I have now interaction note of my history. So that I the user right here, now we
[2714.2s - 2720.3s] are somehow in a in a movie. So the ghost and then I watched matrix, I watched matrix again and
[2720.3s - 2726.2s] then I read here a particular book about this and you see, okay, so these are my interaction notes.
[2726.2s - 2732.3s] These are here the things. Then they built here what they call here. Where is it? The concept notes.
[2732.3s - 2738.4s] These are the triangles. So this goes to Cyberpunk. This goes here to dystopia. This goes here to
[2738.4s - 2743.9s] virtual reality and you see we already kind of a hierarchical structure of here of our note layers.
[2744.7s - 2749.7s] And then we have pure community notes. But these are the global interaction notes.
[2750.6s - 2754.6s] In general, all the people in this planet like ghost in a shell or whatever,
[2754.6s - 2760.4s] whatever, matrix garden tomato, whatever you like to use here. So you built here a network.
[2761.5s - 2764.9s] Now this network has of course, if you want two components,
[2765.5s - 2771.8s] but the first component is here my personal stream. Then we have here how did the community,
[2771.8s - 2776.7s] let's go again with the last five years. So how I developed in the last five years and how does
[2776.7s - 2782.7s] the research community developed in the last five years. And then we have to bring it together
[2782.7s - 2790.0s] in this rating process or by partite fusion operator, whatever you like call it, we go have a look
[2790.2s - 2796.1s] in detail what this is doing and how it is doing. But just the idea. And then after we
[2796.1s - 2802.8s] won't linearize this complexity, we have now for the LLM context window, we can create a system prompt,
[2802.8s - 2811.4s] we can have a stream A of my personal history and the stream B where I tell the AI, look in this
[2811.4s - 2817.8s] five years, my sub community theoretical physics developed decent decent decent decent this.
[2818.3s - 2824.2s] And now this is the information for you as an LLM. This is my input to you as an LLM and know
[2824.2s - 2831.6s] you LLM do the job. So you see we are here in the pre-processing of the data to an LLM.
[2833.4s - 2841.1s] So you see that again, looking here at the graph distribution, we have here the user manifold
[2841.1s - 2847.4s] and we have if you want the community manifold. And now these two streams here are brought to
[2847.8s - 2855.7s] together. So I'm not again squeezing everything into a flat one manifold structure, if it's with
[2855.7s - 2862.1s] high dimensional, but I separate here very specific persona. This is the blue stream. This is
[2862.1s - 2867.7s] me, for example, or you too, hey, what is happening in the world? What is happening in the community?
[2867.7s - 2873.0s] If you are an artist, if you are creative, if you are dance, if you music, whatever, what is
[2873.0s - 2877.4s] happening in your world? And what you have been doing the last five years and we bring it together
[2877.4s - 2885.9s] and we see what emerges. So this persona agent, and this is the complete framework here,
[2885.9s - 2890.8s] overcomes now the cognitive flatness that I told you here at the very beginning of this video.
[2891.8s - 2897.3s] How we do this through a recursive graph rack that we built. So we use something that we know,
[2897.3s - 2902.6s] there's nothing new, there's a little bit new, but everything else is clear. Let's have a look.
[2903.8s - 2909.1s] So what I especially found interesting, how would you code a braiding processor? No, in code,
[2909.9s - 2916.6s] because what it's doing, it's just a linearization. So it must be real simple. And in standard drag,
[2916.6s - 2920.3s] our retrieve log manager generation, the system retrieves the list of documents here from
[2920.3s - 2927.8s] external data sources and just paste them into one to one another in the LLM, but this is stacking
[2928.3s - 2935.2s] this is not braiding. So the often the LLM often gets confused by contradictory or irrelevant data,
[2935.2s - 2940.8s] because maybe in the data we brought back from rack is the earth is flat and then the earth is
[2940.8s - 2948.4s] not flat. So what to believe? So let's solve this. Braiding is now a much smarter structural
[2948.4s - 2953.7s] merge operation. It doesn't just pile up the data. So the earth is flat, the earth is not flat,
[2953.7s - 2961.4s] the earth is whatever. It leaves now two distinct strands of information together to create a stronger
[2961.4s - 2968.8s] rope. I hope with this image, I can communicate what I want to tell you. So the strand A is of course
[2968.8s - 2975.5s] the self. So this is my knowledge and a strand B is the community, the world. So strand A more or
[2975.5s - 2980.6s] less is, hey, what have I done the last five years in theoretical physics? This is my personal history.
[2981.5s - 2985.8s] It's not a vector, but yeah, it's a high dimensional vector, a tensile structure, okay.
[2986.7s - 2992.8s] And strand B simply, hey, what has everyone else on this planet done and published here on archive?
[2992.8s - 2997.7s] So this is the complete knowledge graph and we have here traversal vector that we can explore
[2997.7s - 3003.0s] in the simplest case. So what is this braiding process? It is of course a mathematical function,
[3003.0s - 3009.9s] or if you want an algorithm here, that compares these two strands and finds now an interference
[3009.9s - 3016.7s] pattern. You see what? We don't just here add it up. We have a concatenation. No. We have a look now
[3016.7s - 3023.1s] at the interference. So specific points where your unique quirks, my ideas overlap with the
[3023.1s - 3030.5s] collective trend here of the research community. Very simple example, but it's the simplest example
[3030.5s - 3034.3s] I can think of. Hey, I say at the individual stream is, hey, you like dark chocolate and the
[3034.3s - 3038.6s] collective stream is people who buy red wine also buy dark chocolate and guess what they
[3038.6s - 3043.9s] separated out, but it's yes, you can imagine this. Now, of course, it is a little bit more complicated
[3043.9s - 3050.3s] and it took me again about 20 minutes so that can that nano banana pro generated this image. I
[3050.3s - 3055.1s] wanted to have it like a stargate. I don't know if you know this TV series, but exactly. So here we
[3055.1s - 3061.0s] have stream a here we have stream B personal vector episodic. So with all our little boxes here
[3061.0s - 3066.2s] of knowledge and then here the collective vector, all the publication that have references to all the
[3066.2s - 3070.7s] other publications and those reference other publication and those reverence here persona
[3070.7s - 3077.8s] this reference here some tweets or you get the idea. What is happening here? And at first I saw
[3077.8s - 3083.8s] that I build it like a DNA strand here, a molecular strand, but no, because what I want I want this
[3083.8s - 3091.0s] input and you see here still to do the DNA strand it was not I read it here by nano banana pro, okay?
[3091.0s - 3097.6s] Because this is not the input to our LLM. This is just a data process pre-processing for our LLM
[3097.6s - 3104.7s] machine. So I have to bring this to a linearized context tensor that has your particular optimization
[3104.7s - 3113.5s] routine to have your the perfect input to the LLM. So what is this? Now if you are a subscriber
[3113.5s - 3118.6s] of my channel, you understand immediately when I tell you, you know, this is nothing else than a
[3118.6s - 3127.6s] graph neural network attention mechanism that we apply at inference time. Okay. So what is happening
[3127.6s - 3134.1s] here? This is the most important area now. This braiding processor with our logic gate and here
[3134.1s - 3141.0s] I free the breed is just that is not as important as just push back in space and we just need here
[3141.0s - 3148.2s] the perfect braided here knowledge stream that enters here the LLM as a linearized tensor structure.
[3148.6s - 3156.6s] Let's do this. Now if you look at it from a mathematical perspective that I introduced at the
[3156.6s - 3160.9s] beginning of this video, you immediately see that this is a dual source manifold alignment.
[3160.9s - 3167.7s] The first source is here the episodic stream and the second here is the collective knowledge stream.
[3168.4s - 3175.9s] A dual source manifold alignment. So yeah followed by gated linearization. Of course we have
[3175.9s - 3181.0s] only have a linear prompt here to our LLM but of course it is not a single equation. It would be
[3181.0s - 3186.2s] two easy no come on here. This would be not a topic of one of my videos, but it is a computational
[3186.2s - 3192.9s] pipeline to project see a query into two orthogonal vector spaces again and we have individual
[3192.9s - 3199.0s] and collective. See hope this visualization helps and computes now their intersection to filter
[3199.0s - 3205.6s] out the noise and the rank relevance. So let our domain be defined by heterogeneous knowledge
[3205.6s - 3211.0s] graph on all of theoretical physics. Then we define two distinct submanifolds within this
[3211.0s - 3216.6s] graph structure. Now you know what it is it is the individual manifold at a local subgraph
[3216.6s - 3221.4s] defined here by my little brain and a collective manifold the beauty that everybody else and this
[3221.4s - 3227.1s] planet did in the last five years doing research and subgraph reachable through a community traversal
[3227.7s - 3236.7s] and now the task is the stream a is an individual resonance score that we can calculate and we
[3236.7s - 3242.2s] call this parameter alpha. So this measures how well a candidate node aligns with the user
[3242.2s - 3247.9s] established history. It combines the semantic similarity with the historical weights.
[3248.6s - 3253.8s] The stream b is of course the collective feasibility score from the whole community we call
[3253.8s - 3260.1s] this parameter beta and this measures now how strongly the node is supported by the topology
[3260.1s - 3267.0s] after domain graph itself. So more or less is this a valid node. Am I allowed to sink this in my
[3267.0s - 3272.0s] individual vector stream is this really something that the community recognized as yeah this is
[3272.0s - 3278.5s] something an object that you do we worth to investigate. Beta computes here the random work
[3278.5s - 3283.1s] probability of landing on the node and starting from the query concepts within the domain graph G.
[3284.1s - 3291.4s] But we do have two parameter alpha and beta. It's a simplification I know please don't write to me
[3291.4s - 3296.8s] but there's another parameter yes I know I just want to be here in the main idea. So how is this fusion
[3296.8s - 3302.2s] how is this braiding kernel now operational. You understand that this is the core process allergic
[3302.2s - 3308.4s] that we are talking about. It is not the sum of alpha and beta. We have to perform here a gated
[3308.4s - 3313.0s] fusion operation to reject the hallucination and irrelevant noise.
[3314.3s - 3318.5s] You remember in the first part of the video I showed you that the hallucination is here now is
[3318.5s - 3325.8s] here this big minus here in the grid. So we have a high individual score and zero collective
[3325.8s - 3331.4s] support now. The hallucination is not supported by the research community or published upon it is
[3331.4s - 3338.2s] only apparent here in my individual score. And the irrelevant noise has here high collective
[3338.2s - 3343.9s] scores but zero individual relevance for me. So I don't care for something that is so far away
[3343.9s - 3351.3s] I don't even understand it. And now we calculate here the braided score S braid.
[3352.2s - 3358.2s] And this is now defined since you know the title of this video by a geometric interaction
[3358.2s - 3364.4s] term of two manifolds. So I told you we're going to look here and it is not a good incidence that I
[3364.5s - 3369.4s] tried to make this here not as a vector but more like a wave function. We are looking here at the
[3369.4s - 3376.3s] interference pattern. So just going to give you the result. The braided score is calculated here
[3376.9s - 3382.8s] with an alpha and a beta and in this structure where we have a linear mixture of alpha and beta.
[3382.8s - 3387.2s] So what do I know and what does the community know and a structural gate.
[3388.3s - 3393.4s] And this structural gate is now really important. But you know if you look at this and you think
[3393.4s - 3399.7s] about the very first PDF archive that we just talked about the mirror mind you understand wait a
[3399.7s - 3407.0s] minute. If this is not interpretation here for the mixture process I can use this imagination
[3407.8s - 3415.6s] come back to the first PDF and also build here the identical formula. And now I say here the
[3415.6s - 3423.0s] braided S or further mirror mind is no example it is. Have a look at this. So you see those paper
[3423.0s - 3429.5s] not only have a very similar topic but given here the mathematical formula of the first paper
[3429.5s - 3438.8s] of the second paper I can induce now a equilibrium no and an almost identical idea where I can come
[3438.8s - 3445.4s] up now with the braided score for the mirror mind and you see they are operating now differently.
[3445.8s - 3452.9s] Why? Because this has a repulsory effect the first one and this has a structural gate.
[3453.6s - 3460.6s] So there is a difference but there otherwise real similar. So what is the critical nuance
[3460.6s - 3465.1s] that distinguishes this? I told you mirror mind is for the scientific discovery process here
[3465.9s - 3472.7s] and the persona agent here is of course about a recommendation. While both systems use you
[3472.7s - 3478.4s] the braiding mechanism they use you the individual stream alpha or opposite purposes.
[3479.3s - 3484.8s] One is respulsion and this is the mirror mind the individual stream acts as a negative constraint
[3484.8s - 3489.2s] where I remember this was the deep blue gravity valve where I told you this is what I knew best
[3489.2s - 3496.5s] this is where I'm sitting I'm lazy I don't move at all out of my beauty zone here and I need now some
[3496.6s - 3503.4s] powers I'm impetus to move me out of here for the optimal path to P store. So this is now in
[3503.4s - 3512.1s] mirror mind a repulsor my alpha. Now of course in this yeah again here this is here the term our
[3512.1s - 3517.1s] novelty repulsor if you want to be specific. So you do have an intersection of a high domain
[3517.1s - 3524.1s] visibility and a high persona surprise and the optimization objective is to find out the node N
[3524.2s - 3530.5s] that maximizes this s-breeded value or in this formulation here for the mirror mind.
[3531.8s - 3537.4s] Again alpha the individual nurture measures how similar the idea is to what the scientist what I
[3537.4s - 3542.3s] have already written in the last five years and beta is yet a collective validity all the global
[3542.3s - 3547.4s] publication here that is what is mathematically possible that has been peer-reviewed that has
[3547.4s - 3552.5s] been agreed upon yeah this is a real interesting research topic this is yet a wireframe great that
[3552.5s - 3558.6s] I showed you here in the first visualization here of this video and we want this to be high because
[3559.8s - 3566.9s] this is now exactly at the intersection that we're going to optimize. Now of course as I told you
[3566.9s - 3572.6s] I will show you here that title in a particular way if you read these two preprints in this sequence
[3573.5s - 3577.7s] and I'm just here sorting this out for you that you have an easier learning process
[3578.4s - 3584.5s] I can come up with this idea so to those persons who are really checking here whatever I tell you
[3584.5s - 3590.9s] is this really written down in the PDF no I'm not going beyond both PDF publications I know combine
[3590.9s - 3595.9s] them since they were published on the same day the authors had no idea from each other so but I
[3595.9s - 3603.0s] now reading those I see they have common ground and so let's do this so my idea careful bugle up
[3603.0s - 3610.1s] is we can combine PDF1 mirror mind with the persona agent to get a unified contextualization and
[3610.1s - 3618.8s] output so image1 clear now we have p-starter proposed great new idea where I have to go and now all
[3618.8s - 3625.7s] I say is listen if I have no this idea I can bring it over now into the persona agent where I told
[3625.7s - 3631.0s] you we're working out pure in a graph structure the graph extractor for the persona agent and I
[3631.0s - 3637.9s] just bring this over as one node for the network this is it I mean simple come on this is all
[3637.9s - 3646.1s] you have to do to have some new insights and I'm trying to be good to combine both coding and I
[3646.1s - 3653.1s] mean Gemini 3 pro will do the coding for me and maybe I can build this system operation only let's
[3653.6s - 3661.7s] see but of course I can insert any node if I want and why not insert here the perfect research idea
[3661.7s - 3668.3s] node here into the interaction node here of my personal history because this would be my personal
[3668.3s - 3673.3s] future the very new future where this system tells me integrate this into your
[3673.9s - 3678.7s] rough knowledge graph because this is your future that you should research and then
[3679.4s - 3684.5s] I just combine this here with the persona agent as published already with the concept nodes with
[3684.5s - 3689.8s] the community nodes here we have the braiding machine that does here our braiding processing as
[3689.8s - 3695.3s] I already described to you and then the output what you have is a linearization a linearization
[3695.3s - 3700.3s] context window where I showed you have the perfect system prompt for me as a persona for me to
[3700.3s - 3705.8s] be an intellectual sparring partner I have my personal history that I present here to the AI
[3705.8s - 3711.4s] the collective signal what has the our community done in the last five years for my particular
[3711.4s - 3719.0s] brand new idea and then again now I refine the contextual linear idea this is here the p-star
[3719.0s - 3726.2s] and the collective inside here also from a purely graph structure so you see just
[3726.2s - 3733.9s] braided together everything together and isn't this looking gorgeous now if you want to have to
[3733.9s - 3740.9s] go a little bit deeper I further annotated this graph that was built with nano banana pro so here
[3740.9s - 3747.6s] you find some additional sorts here from my side but yeah I'm sure you get the idea
[3750.5s - 3755.8s] so this image now illustrate here a new solution to the cognitive flatness we want to solve this
[3755.8s - 3762.6s] now and we sequentially apply here to simple structural operation we have an optimization as I
[3762.6s - 3767.9s] showed you in my own mind so we find a local maximum for novelty within the value constraints
[3767.9s - 3774.2s] this is here a blue graph anti contextualization as the second structural operation as I've shown
[3774.2s - 3780.4s] today autos of persona agent it so what it is we anchor the maximum if in the heterogeneous
[3780.4s - 3786.5s] knowledge graph to ensure it aligns with both the personal history and the social reality of the
[3786.5s - 3795.4s] research community take a step back and think about what we have just achieved just reading two
[3795.4s - 3804.9s] paper you have read now only two papers structure is the new prompt the intelligence itself is not
[3804.9s - 3811.9s] here because this is just the input to the lalm this is not intelligence is encoded in the manifold
[3812.6s - 3821.7s] and in the graph well the lalm serves merely here as a traversal engine that is now computing this
[3823.4s - 3830.6s] it is not even computing this because this manifold and the graph are constructing constraints
[3831.3s - 3837.5s] on the operational space of the lalm itself so what I want to propose to you
[3838.0s - 3847.1s] huh that this shift here defines the next generation of neural symbology why because the locals the
[3847.1s - 3853.5s] place of intelligence is shifting now from the parametric knowledge of the lalm the model weights
[3853.5s - 3861.0s] the tensor weights itself after vision language model to the non parametric structure to the external
[3861.0s - 3869.3s] architecture so for my case this would be here my intellectual landscape with the community landscape
[3869.3s - 3876.0s] we process here the path my personal path to my personal optimal idea then I bring it here into a
[3876.0s - 3882.2s] pure graph representation I have the degrading process a computing here this and then I have here more or
[3882.2s - 3890.6s] less all the history of mine and all the intelligence and the development of my scientific ideas here
[3891.0s - 3898.3s] all very presented here so I think we are shifting here more away from the lalm is the only
[3898.3s - 3906.2s] source of intelligence and we have a lot more non parametric structure that will do here in front
[3906.2s - 3914.9s] of the lalm the real intelligence work if you want to call it now now maybe you have seen that
[3914.9s - 3921.0s] some days ago I posted here on my channel also here the latest research here from medical about
[3921.0s - 3930.6s] manifold learning for medical EEG and I've showed you here publication they discovered it really
[3930.6s - 3936.9s] depends here on the mathematical space that we construct and they found that the Euclidean
[3936.9s - 3943.8s] latent spaces distorted the true structure of the electro-entervalogram they said with this you
[3943.8s - 3951.0s] know this unconstrained vector space this is not optimal we can use AI for medical here because
[3951.0s - 3956.6s] near bone neural state may be mapped for a path in this unconstrained vector space irrelevant state
[3956.6s - 3963.1s] may become artificial close what we do not want the attention operates with the wrong metric operator
[3963.1s - 3967.7s] and the dynamics prediction must learn the geometry from scratch which is unstable in itself
[3968.6s - 3972.6s] and the authors found a solution and they said we have to build a remaining and variational
[3972.8s - 3979.7s] order encoder that will fix this by forcing the complete latent space to have the correct curvature
[3980.3s - 3986.7s] it is just about the geometry of the space and they say once we have fixed the geometry and put on
[3986.7s - 3994.4s] constrained on this space the geometry becomes correct the geodesic distance becomes meaningful the
[3994.4s - 3999.4s] geometric attention works properly and neural ordinary differential equation to the trajectory
[3999.4s - 4006.1s] becomes smooth consistent and stable and I it is also this paper here that I will show you here
[4006.8s - 4011.5s] and I've given you a very short introduction what is a Riemann variational order encoder what is
[4011.5s - 4016.3s] the geometric transformers particular the geometric attention height is calculated and why do we
[4016.3s - 4023.0s] need manifold constrained neural ODE's but have a look at this paper this is here from Yale University
[4023.8s - 4031.4s] Lehigh University, Badley Ham and School of Medicine, Yale University and they all ready and this is
[4031.4s - 4039.7s] here just a day before November 20th 2025 and they did something similar not the identical idea
[4039.7s - 4044.3s] but they also said hey listen our solution space is too huge is too unconstrained it doesn't make
[4044.3s - 4049.9s] sense no which is don't waste energy and everything but it's not stable it is not what we need
[4050.0s - 4056.0s] and they built it is a Riemann variational order encoder then they built it a geometric transformer
[4056.6s - 4062.2s] and you see here too we operate here on a very particular manifold with a very particular
[4062.2s - 4068.6s] optimization in a very particular positional encoding if you want here for a path optimization
[4068.6s - 4074.8s] problem and then we bring this path optimization problem from a manifold in a pure graph structure
[4074.8s - 4079.4s] we do the braiding and then we get a result and this is more or less exactly here
[4080.1s - 4085.4s] and a different complexity level what they did here with their architecture in this particular
[4085.4s - 4092.3s] paper and they called it a many fold former the geometric deep learning for neural dynamics on
[4092.3s - 4099.1s] Riemannian manifolds and this is now my third paper that I want just to show you because I have a
[4099.1s - 4104.9s] feeling this is the way we're going with the completed I system it is not that we're going to have
[4104.9s - 4112.0s] the next extremely huge alarm and we put all of the intelligence only in this alarm I think this
[4112.0s - 4120.5s] would be the wrong way I don't feel the dizziness the right way to go but of course you could say
[4120.5s - 4126.3s] okay this is now your idea but let's increase the complexity because if we are playing around that
[4126.3s - 4132.3s] we have no help individualization and I don't have to do this visualization by hand I can now think
[4132.3s - 4137.0s] a little bit longer no like any idea it seems a little bit longer in a problem so let's increase
[4137.0s - 4144.0s] the complexity further yeah so I found a not only this third paper but I found another paper
[4144.0s - 4151.2s] really high level paper that it brings this to a complete new level but it has a coherence in
[4151.2s - 4157.2s] the development but I think this is the end of part one I think it the video is already long enough
[4157.2s - 4162.5s] but I just wanted to present you some brand new ideas in the eye that I have a feeling will be the
[4162.5s - 4169.1s] future of the eye and I have to tell you the next part will a little bit more challenging so I decided
[4169.1s - 4176.7s] to do part two of this video and it will be only an expert outlook and I will do it for members only
[4176.7s - 4182.2s] because I want to give back to the people to support me with their membership of my channel so I
[4182.2s - 4188.2s] want to give back to them and I want to present them just my ideas in the way I see the future of the eye
[4189.7s - 4197.2s] so I think part one provides already so many new ideas for the AI community in general but if you
[4197.2s - 4203.4s] decided here to support me personally I want to give back to you and therefore part two will show
[4203.5s - 4209.8s] you here my personal thoughts here and we will increase the complexity and we will go a step further
[4209.8s - 4214.3s] and I will give you an outlook of the eye that is just what I feel that we are going to move
[4214.3s - 4220.5s] together as an AI community anyway I hope you enjoyed it was a little bit longer the video but I
[4220.5s - 4227.0s] wanted to show you how amazing it can be if you just read two three four five maybe a hundred new
[4227.0s - 4233.6s] PDF papers and you see common patterns you develop here common ground you see that everybody is
[4233.6s - 4240.2s] moving in the same direction and I just wanted to make it crystal clear to you where this is now
[4240.2s - 4246.3s] going to be but of course it could be that we have a brand new development tomorrow but at least
[4246.3s - 4252.0s] let's have fun with AI let's play with it it is so beautiful to discover here complete new ideas
[4252.0s - 4256.4s] in other federal intelligence so I hope you enjoyed it maybe you want to subscribe maybe you
[4256.4s - 4261.0s] even become a member of the channel anyway I hope I see you in one of my next videos

2433
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/processed/create_coding_project.md Normal file
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

21
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/processed/extract_recommendations.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
universal@white ~/D/M/E/A/Personal Assistant> cat ./8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on_transcript.txt | fabric -sp extract_recommendations
- Use dual indexes: dense vectors for concepts and sparse indexes for exact terms.
- Build a multi-layered memory with episodic, semantic, and persona components.
- Model a user's cognitive trajectory from their personal data over time.
- Transform a person's knowledge timeline into a weighted knowledge graph.
- Convert static knowledge graphs into dynamic, gravity well-like manifolds.
- Create a novelty repulsor to push AI reasoning beyond known expertise.
- Construct a second manifold representing collective, domain-specific knowledge.
- Use a braiding processor to merge individual and collective knowledge streams.
- Implement gated fusion to filter out hallucinations and irrelevant noise.
- Move intelligence from parametric model weights to non-parametric external structures.
- Employ multi-agent systems with specialized domain and author agents.
- Optimize for ideas at the intersection of personal and community knowledge.
- Anchor new ideas in both personal history and social reality.
- Use geometric attention and manifold-constrained neural ODEs for stability.
- Ensure exact lexical matching for technical terms to prevent errors.
- Apply rank fusion to combine results from different retrieval methods.
- Linearize complex graph structures for LLM context windows.
- Design AI personas that act as intellectual sparring partners.
- Frame discovery as a dual-constraint optimization problem.
- Leverage tools like GraphRAG for advanced reasoning over knowledge graphs.

21
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/processed/extract_references.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
universal@white ~/D/M/E/A/Personal Assistant> cat ./8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on_transcript.txt | fabric -sp extract_references
- MirrorMind: Empowering OmniScientist with Expert Perspectives paper
- Persona agents with GraphRAG paper from Purdue and Columbia University
- Ghost in the Shell film referenced in graph example
- The Matrix film referenced in graph example
- Stargate TV series referenced for visual analogy
- Manifold learning for medical EEG research paper
- Riemannian variational autoencoder paper from Yale and Lehigh
- Geometric Transformer for neural dynamics paper
- OpenAlex open-source research database
- GraphRAG technique for knowledge graphs
- Markovian systems theorem in artificial intelligence
- Euclidean latent spaces in machine learning research
- Kernel density estimation method
- BM25 algorithm for sparse inverted index
- Reciprocal rank fusion method
- MapReduce pipeline from early AI
- Graph neural networks (GNNs) as a topic
- Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as a topic
- Knowledge graph construction techniques
- Neural ordinary differential equations (ODEs) paper

135
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/processed/review_design.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
# Architecture Design Review: Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture
## 1. Architecture Clarity and Component Design
### Strengths
- The dual manifold concept (individual and collective) is a clear, high-level separation of concerns.
- The layered memory structure (episodic, semantic, persona) provides a logical progression from raw data to abstract representation.
- The use of hybrid indexing (dense vector + sparse BM25) for episodic memory addresses the need for both conceptual and exact matching in scientific domains.
- The transformation pipeline from temporal data to topological graph to manifold (gravity well) is conceptually sound for modeling cognitive evolution.
### Weaknesses & Improvements
- **Vague Component Boundaries:** The interactions between the episodic, semantic, and persona layers are described narratively but lack precise APIs, data contracts, or flow control mechanisms.
- **Unclear Responsibility Allocation:** The "braiding processor" and "knowledge integrator" are described as magical components without defined algorithms or failure modes.
- **Redundancy Risk:** The separate construction of an individual manifold and a community manifold might lead to duplicated data ingestion and processing pipelines.
- **Recommendation:** Define explicit interfaces between layers. Specify the data schema passed from episodic to semantic memory (e.g., a structured JSON with chunks, metadata, timestamps). Formalize the "braiding" operation as a deterministic, testable function with clear input/output.
## 2. External System Integrations
### Analysis
- **OpenAlex/Community Knowledge:** Integration is essential but treated as a monolithic "wireframe grid." No details on connection protocols, authentication, rate limiting, or handling API changes/downtime.
- **LLM Services:** The architecture assumes access to LLMs (for semantic distillation, inference) but does not specify how they are invoked, how prompts are managed, or how costs/quotas are handled.
- **External Data Sources (user files, emails):** Access to personal data is mentioned but without any protocol or security model.
### Improvements
- Implement a dedicated **Integration Gateway** to manage all external API calls, with built-in retries, circuit breakers, and monitoring.
- Use API keys/secrets management for services like OpenAlex. Design for **client isolation** if the system serves multiple users.
- Abstract LLM interactions behind a **provider-agnostic service** to allow switching models and managing token usage.
## 3. Security Architecture
### Weaknesses
- **Data Access:** The system presupposes access to a user's entire file system and emails. This presents a massive attack surface and privacy risk.
- **Authentication/Authorization:** Entirely absent. No mention of how users authenticate, how their data is scoped, or how multi-tenancy would be enforced.
- **Data in Transit/At Rest:** No discussion of encryption for personal data or knowledge graphs.
- **Injection Risks:** The braiding process and LLM prompts incorporate user and community data without a clear sanitization step.
### Improvements
- Implement a strict **permission model** for user data (e.g., OAuth scopes, file system sandboxing).
- Enforce **role-based access control (RBAC)** for system functions.
- Encrypt personal data at rest and in transit. Ensure knowledge graph databases are also encrypted.
- Introduce **input validation and sanitization** layers for all data entering the braiding/LLM pipelines to prevent prompt injection.
## 4. Performance, Scalability, and Resilience
### Strengths
- The hybrid index (vector + BM25) can improve retrieval precision/recall.
- Containerized deployment is mentioned, which aids reproducibility and scaling.
### Weaknesses & Improvements
- **Potential Bottlenecks:**
- The "cognitive distillation" via LLM on a user's entire history could be extremely slow and costly.
- Building and updating the community manifold (from millions of papers) is a massive, continuous batch job.
- The dual-constraint optimization (finding P*) is computationally intensive and not defined algorithmically.
- **Scalability:** The architecture is described for a single user. Horizontal scaling for multiple users is not addressed. User data and models are likely not shareable, leading to linear resource growth.
- **Resilience:** No discussion of fault tolerance. If the community manifold build fails, does the system degrade gracefully?
- **Recommendations:**
- Implement **asynchronous processing** for heavy pipelines (e.g., building persona graphs). Use message queues.
- Design the community manifold as a **shared, incrementally updated service** to avoid per-user duplication.
- Define **SLOs/SLIs** for key user journeys (e.g., "suggestion generation latency").
- Implement **caching** at multiple levels (e.g., retrieved documents, computed similarity scores).
## 5. Data Management and Storage Security
### Analysis
- **Data Flow:** The flow from raw user data -> episodic chunks -> semantic summaries -> persona graph -> manifold is clear but lacks optimization points. Each step may persist data, leading to storage bloat.
- **Data Segregation:** The biggest risk is commingling user data. The design does not specify if databases/indices are per-user or shared. A breach in one component could expose all users' data.
- **Storage Security:** No mention of how the sensitive personal data (emails, files) is stored, backed up, or purged.
### Improvements
- Enforce **data isolation at the storage layer**. Use separate database instances/namespaces per user or strong tenant IDs with row-level security.
- Implement a **data lifecycle policy**. Automatically archive or delete intermediate representations after a period.
- For the community knowledge, use a **central, read-optimized store** (like a data warehouse) that is logically separated from user data stores.
- All storage must support encryption at rest. Access logs must be enabled for audit trails.
## 6. Maintainability, Flexibility, and Future Growth
### Strengths
- The modular, layered design (episodic, semantic, persona) supports independent evolution of each component.
- The abstract concept of a "manifold" allows for different implementations (gravity well, wireframe, etc.).
### Weaknesses & Improvements
- **Tight Coupling to Scientific Domain:** The emphasis on exact term matching (BM25) and peer-reviewed sources makes it less flexible for other creative or non-scientific domains.
- **Onboarding New Clients:** Adding a new user requires processing their entire digital history—a potentially slow, expensive process with no incremental update strategy.
- **Technology Lock-in:** Heavy reliance on specific paradigms (RAG, knowledge graphs, LLMs). Changing one component (e.g., swapping the vector DB) could have cascading effects.
- **Recommendations:**
- Develop **pluggable "domain adapters"** for the episodic memory layer to handle different data types (scientific papers, code, art).
- Design a **warm-start mechanism** for new users, perhaps using public data to bootstrap a profile before full personal data ingestion.
- Use **configuration-driven pipelines** and dependency injection to make swapping algorithms (e.g., different similarity metrics, graph algorithms) easier.
## 7. Potential Risks and Areas for Improvement
### Identified Risks
1. **Third-Party Dependency Risk:** The system's utility depends on external services (OpenAlex, LLM APIs). Their downtime, cost changes, or policy shifts could break the system.
2. **Privacy and Compliance Risk:** Processing personal files/emails likely violates GDPR/CCPA unless explicit consent and data handling agreements are in place.
3. **Performance Risk:** The architecture has several computationally heavy, sequential steps. Real-time interaction may be impossible.
4. **"Hallucination" in Core Logic:** The novelty repulsor and braiding logic are novel and unproven. They may not yield useful suggestions.
### Actionable Recommendations
- **Security & Privacy:**
- Conduct a Privacy Impact Assessment. Implement data anonymization for the research/community manifold builds.
- Add a user-facing dashboard to view/delete processed data.
- **Performance & Scalability:**
- Profile the pipeline to identify the slowest step. Optimize or introduce parallel processing.
- Design for eventual consistency; the user's persona graph can be updated offline.
- **Integration:**
- Create adapter interfaces for all external systems. Develop mock services for testing.
- Implement a feature flag to disable non-critical external integrations during outages.
- **Data Management:**
- Version all stored data (chunks, graphs, manifolds). This allows rolling back faulty pipeline updates.
- Implement data quality checks (e.g., for the semantic memory summary, check for factual consistency with source chunks).
## 8. Document Readability
### Inconsistencies and Issues
- **Vocabulary:** The transcript mixes metaphors ("gravity well", "braiding", "wireframe", "manifold") without always linking them to concrete technical constructs.
- **Jargon Overload:** Terms like "non-parametric structure," "geometric intersection," and "Markovian system" are used without definition, making the design inaccessible to non-experts.
- **Lack of Diagrams:** The verbal description of complex data flows (individual vs. community manifold, braiding) is hard to follow. No system context or sequence diagrams are provided.
- **Narrative Digression:** The document is a video transcript, so it contains asides, examples, and promotional content that obscure the core architecture.
### Suggestions for Rewrite
1. **Create a Formal Architecture Document** separate from the promotional video content.
2. **Define a Glossary** of key terms (manifold, braiding, episodic memory, etc.) with technical definitions.
3. **Include Standard Diagrams:**
- A high-level **component diagram** showing all services and data stores.
- A **data flow diagram** for the primary "suggestion generation" use case.
- A **sequence diagram** illustrating the interaction between the coordinator agent, domain agents, and integrator.
4. **Structure the Document** using standard sections: Overview, Principles, Components, Data Design, Integration, Security, Deployment, and Operational Considerations.
## Conclusion
### Summary of Strengths
The proposed dual manifold cognitive architecture presents a visionary and theoretically grounded approach to moving beyond flat LLM representations. Its core strength lies in the structured modeling of individual cognitive trajectory and its juxtaposition against collective knowledge. The layered memory model and the hybrid retrieval strategy are well-justified for the scientific domain. The containerized deployment mention indicates an awareness of modern software practices.
### Critical Areas for Enhancement
The most critical adjustments needed are in the areas of **security, data isolation, and operational robustness**. The current design neglects fundamental security requirements for handling sensitive personal data. Furthermore, the lack of clarity on scalability and resilience makes it unsuitable for production. Addressing these gaps—through explicit security controls, a robust multi-tenant data strategy, and a defined performance/deployment model—would significantly increase the architecture's viability. The innovative "braiding" and optimization logic, while promising, should be treated as a high-risk research component until validated and specified with algorithmic precision.

13
docs/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture/youtube_transcriber.log Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
2025-12-03 13:23:31,846 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Initialized YouTubeTranscriber with output_dir: ./
2025-12-03 13:23:31,847 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Starting processing for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GGuKOrooJA
2025-12-03 13:23:31,847 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Extracting metadata for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GGuKOrooJA
2025-12-03 13:23:34,282 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Successfully extracted metadata for: AI Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture (Experts only)
2025-12-03 13:23:34,283 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Downloading audio for: AI Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture (Experts only)
2025-12-03 13:23:45,646 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Audio downloaded successfully: temp/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on.webm
2025-12-03 13:23:45,646 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Transcribing audio: temp/8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on.webm
2025-12-03 13:23:45,646 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Loading Whisper model: base
2025-12-03 13:25:29,092 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Transcription completed. Text length: 63660 characters
2025-12-03 13:25:29,093 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Analyzing content for topics and quality
2025-12-03 13:25:29,093 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Content analysis completed with fallback method
2025-12-03 13:25:29,099 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Results saved to: 8GGuKOrooJA_AI-Dual-Manifold-Cognitive-Architecture-Experts-on.json
2025-12-03 13:25:29,111 - __main__.YouTubeTranscriber - INFO - Successfully processed video in 117.3s: AI Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture (Experts only)

47
docs/UI/UX Design Document: Advanced Second Brain PKM System.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
# UI/UX Design Document: Advanced Second Brain PKM System
This document details the aesthetic and interaction design principles for the Advanced Second Brain PKM system, ensuring a critical balance between **data density**, **developer experience (UX)**, and **consumer usability**. The design is intended to support deep, focused work.
## 1. Design Philosophy & Aesthetics
The aesthetic is centered around a high-contrast, dark-mode environment, prioritizing function and clarity. This approach is specifically chosen to reduce eye strain during long work sessions involving code, data, and extensive reading.
| Aspect | Principle | Details |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Theme** | Dark Mode by default. | Utilizes deep charcoal backgrounds (`#121212`, `#1E1E1E`) to create a tool-like, focused environment. |
| **Contrast** | High-contrast text. | Ensures optimal readability against the dark background for all content. |
| **Typography** | Dual Font Strategy. | A clean sans-serif (e.g., Inter or Roboto) is used for general UI elements, while a highly readable monospaced font (e.g., Fira Code or JetBrains Mono) is reserved for all code, REPLs, and data outputs to enhance the developer experience. |
### Color Accents for Functional Cues
Neon accents are strategically employed to denote state, function, and active elements, providing immediate visual feedback without cluttering the interface. **Cyan** is designated for Dana code and IDE elements, clearly marking the agent logic components. **Purple** is used for orchestration and agent management interfaces, highlighting the system's multi-agent communication layer. Finally, **Emerald** is reserved for "Fabric" analysis outputs and system success states, drawing the user's attention to extracted insights and positive system feedback.
## 2. Layout and Structure
The layout is designed to manage high data density through a persistent anchor and a highly flexible, multi-pane main content area.
### 2.1. Global Navigation Sidebar
The sidebar is a narrow, persistent element on the far left of every screen, serving as the user's primary anchor. Its purpose is to provide immediate access to the highest-level views (Dashboard, Global Chat, Settings) and facilitate rapid context switching between knowledge domains.
### 2.2. Domain Workspace Layout (Knowledge Browser Mode)
This mode, the core reading and analysis view, employs a classic three-pane structure to maximize simultaneous information display and support the user's need to view documents, graphs, and code concurrently.
| Pane Name | Position | Width | Function |
| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Pane 1: The Drawer** | Far Left | 250px (Collapsible) | **Context/Source Management**. Displays the file tree of the local domain directory (e.g., `Papers`, `Notes`, `Media`), acting as the source selector. |
| **Pane 2: Content Viewer** | Middle | Flexible (Largest) | **Primary Content Display**. Renders the selected file (PDF, Markdown, Video) in a clean, distraction-free environment. |
| **Pane 3: Insight/Fabric** | Right | 400px (Collapsible) | **AI-Generated Analysis**. Displays structured, on-demand analysis of the content in the Content Viewer, generated by "Fabric" patterns. |
### 2.3. Domain Workspace Layout (Agent Studio Mode)
This mode is optimized for the **Developer UX**, mimicking a modern Integrated Development Environment (IDE) structure with distinct panels for context management, code editing, and execution.
## 3. Key Interaction Patterns
Interaction design focuses on intuitive access to complex features:
* **Video Interaction**: Video content in the Content Viewer must feature a synchronized, interactive transcript below the player. This allows users to navigate the video by clicking text, directly linking the visual and textual data streams.
* **Ubiquitous Chat**: A floating chat bubble overlay provides immediate, context-aware access to the domain agent for questions about the currently open document, ensuring that help and analysis are always one click away.
* **Orchestrator Scope**: The **Global Orchestrator Chat** utilizes a clear, multi-select checkbox interface to define the scope of the query, making complex, cross-domain searches intuitive and explicit for the user.

48
docs/grok-chat/Functional Specification: Advanced.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# Functional Specification: Advanced Second Brain PKM System
This document outlines the core functional requirements and features for the Advanced Second Brain Personal Knowledge Management (PKM) system, derived from the detailed UI design proposal. The system is designed to be a highly advanced "Second Brain" that integrates local data sovereignty with a multi-agent hierarchical architecture.
## 1. Core System Capabilities
The foundation of the PKM system rests on four critical capabilities that define its advanced nature and functionality. These capabilities ensure the system is both a powerful knowledge repository and a flexible development environment.
| Feature | Description | Technical Requirement |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Local Data Sovereignty** | All domain-specific knowledge, metadata, knowledge graphs, and embeddings must be linked to and stored in a singular, local directory on the user's system. This ensures user control and ownership of all data assets. | File system integration, secure local storage, and directory monitoring capabilities. |
| **Multi-Agent Architecture** | The system must support the deployment and management of multiple domain-specific agents, each functioning as an expert in its chosen field of knowledge. | A robust agent orchestration layer is required to manage agent lifecycle and communication, with native integration for the Dana language. |
| **Dana Language Integration** | The system must natively support the Dana language for defining and executing agent logic, including features for editing, testing, and real-time execution. | Requires a Dana compiler or interpreter, along with a fully functional Read-Eval-Print Loop (REPL) environment integrated into the application. |
| **Knowledge Graph/Embeddings** | Each domain must utilize a dynamic knowledge graph and associated vector embeddings for advanced semantic querying, context management, and relationship visualization. | Integration with a suitable graph database and an efficient embedding generation pipeline are necessary. |
## 2. View-Specific Features
The application is structured around four primary views, each tailored to a specific user interaction pattern: global navigation, dashboard overview, domain-specific knowledge work, and cross-domain orchestration.
### 2.1. Global Navigation (Persistent Sidebar)
A narrow, persistent sidebar serves as the primary anchoring element on the far left of every screen. This sidebar provides immediate access to the highest-level views and facilitates rapid context switching. The core links include the **Dashboard / Goals** (`[🏠]`), the **Global Orchestrator Chat** (`[💬]`), and **Settings / Data Map** (`[⚙️]`). Below these core links, a **Domain Quick Switch** section lists all configured knowledge domains (e.g., `[🧠] Neuroscience`, `[💻] CompSci`), allowing the user to switch contexts instantly. The sidebar also includes a link for **Domain Management** (`[➕] Add Domain`) and a **User Profile** link (`[👤]`).
### 2.2. View 1: The Dashboard (Home Base)
The Dashboard is the user's landing page, providing a high-level overview of personal objectives and the current state of the knowledge landscape. Its layout is divided into two main columns. The **Left Column** is dedicated to **Goals & Status**, featuring a **Personal Objectives Module** (functioning as a checklist or Kanban board for tracking learning goals) and a **System Status** display that provides real-time updates on background processes (e.g., "Orchestrator: Idle," "Scraper Agent: Active"). The **Right Column** presents the **Domain Grid**, a collection of large, clickable cards for each domain. Each card must display the domain icon, name, document count, last active date, and a small status indicator reflecting the health and training status of its specific Dana Agent (e.g., "Agent Status: Trained").
### 2.3. View 2: Domain Workspace - Knowledge Browser Mode
This is the core reading and analysis view, designed to manage data density through a three-pane layout. A sub-navigation bar at the top allows switching between the `Knowledge Browser`, `Agent Studio (Dana IDE)`, and `Domain Settings`.
The three main panes are:
1. **Pane 1: The Drawer (Far Left)**: This pane displays a file tree that mirrors the local domain directory structure, including categories like `📁 Papers`, `📁 Notes`, `📹 Media`, and `🕸️ Scraped_Web`. Its primary function is to act as a source selector; clicking any file loads its content into the Middle Pane.
2. **Pane 2: Content Viewer (Middle)**: This is the largest, most flexible pane, dedicated to content display. For text and PDF files, it must provide a robust, clean reading experience with a high-fidelity renderer. For video content, it must feature a video player synchronized with an interactive transcript displayed below, allowing users to navigate the video by clicking text.
3. **Pane 3: Insight/Fabric (Right)**: This pane is initially blank but contains a `[ Run Fabric Pattern ]` button. Its function is to generate structured output based on selected "Fabric" analysis patterns (e.g., "Extract Wisdom," "Summarize," "Find Action Items") against the content currently displayed in the Content Viewer.
An **Ubiquitous Chat Overlay**—a floating chat bubble at the bottom right—provides immediate, context-aware access to the domain agent for questions specifically related to the currently open document and domain.
### 2.4. View 3: Domain Workspace - Agent Studio Mode (Dana IDE)
The Agent Studio is an IDE-style environment for engineering and customizing the domain's Dana agent. It is divided into three functional areas:
1. **Left Panel (Context & Graph Manager)**: This area manages the agent's knowledge sources. It includes a checklist of file paths that define the agent's context and a **Visualizer**—a mini-map of the domain's knowledge graph. The visualizer must allow users to click a node to highlight relevant code or source documents.
2. **Middle Panel (The Dana Editor)**: This is a full-featured code editor with syntax highlighting for Dana. It must support tabbed editing for core agent files such as `agent.dana`, `tools.dana`, and `config.json`.
3. **Bottom Panel (The REPL & Logs)**: This panel provides an interactive **Terminal** for the Dana REPL, enabling immediate testing of agent functions (e.g., `dana> load agent.dana`). It also displays real-time **Logs** for agent indexing, execution, and error reporting.
### 2.5. View 4: Global Orchestrator Chat
The Global Orchestrator Chat is a large, central chat interface designed for complex, cross-domain querying. Its distinguishing feature is the **Domain Scope Selector**, located just above the chat input bar. This selector allows the user to explicitly choose which knowledge bases/domains are relevant to the query using checkboxes (e.g., `[x] History`, `[x] Economics`). The backend's core functionality here is to intelligently determine whether to call individual domain agents and synthesize their answers or handle the query with the orchestrator alone, displaying the resulting synthesis in the **Chat History**.

48
docs/grok-chat/Technical Requirements: Advanced Second Brain PKM System.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# Technical Requirements: Advanced Second Brain PKM System
This document details the underlying technical infrastructure and components required to implement the proposed Advanced Second Brain PKM system. The requirements are structured to ensure a robust, scalable, and highly functional application that supports both knowledge consumption and agent development.
## 1. Core Infrastructure and Data Management
The system's foundation relies on integrating local file management with advanced AI and data processing capabilities.
| Requirement | Description | Notes |
| :--- | :--- | :--- |
| **Local File System Integration** | The application must be capable of reading, writing, and actively monitoring a user-specified local directory for each domain. This is fundamental to the principle of "Local Data Sovereignty." | Requires robust, cross-platform file system watchers and secure permissions management to ensure data integrity and user control. |
| **Dana Language Runtime** | A secure and performant runtime environment is mandatory for the execution of Dana code, which defines the logic of the domain-specific agents. | This necessitates the integration of a Dana compiler or interpreter into the application's backend to handle agent execution and testing. |
| **Knowledge Graph Database** | A dedicated graph database (e.g., Neo4j, Dgraph, or a local equivalent) must be employed to store and query the complex relationships within the domain-specific knowledge graphs. | The database must support efficient querying and provide the necessary API for the graph visualization component. |
| **Embedding Service** | A service is required for the generation and persistent storage of vector embeddings for all ingested documents and media transcripts. | This service is critical for enabling semantic search, context retrieval, and advanced reasoning by the agents. |
| **Agent Orchestration Layer** | A central service must be developed to manage the lifecycle, routing, and synthesis of responses from the multiple domain-specific agents. | This layer must handle concurrent agent calls and intelligently manage the "Domain Scope" selection initiated from the Global Orchestrator Chat. |
## 2. Agent and Tooling Requirements
The system requires specialized agents and a modular framework for knowledge processing.
### 2.1. Domain Agents and Configuration
Each domain agent must be highly configurable, allowing users to define its behavior through its own Dana code, specify its context sources (i.e., the file paths it monitors), and link it to its specific knowledge graph and embeddings.
### 2.2. Media Scraper Agent
A dedicated background agent is required to automate the processing of media content. This agent must be capable of:
* Detecting new media files (e.g., `.mp4`, `.mp3`, `.webm`).
* Transcribing the audio/video content to text.
* Synchronizing the generated transcript with the media timeline to enable interactive navigation.
### 2.3. Fabric Analysis Patterns
The system must incorporate a modular framework that allows for the definition and execution of various "Fabric" analysis patterns (e.g., Summarize, Extract Ideas, Find Action Items). This framework must be callable on-demand against any content currently displayed in the Content Viewer.
## 3. UI/IDE Component Requirements
The application's interface requires several high-fidelity components to support both the consumer and developer experience.
* **Code Editor Component**: A robust, embeddable code editor (e.g., Monaco Editor) is necessary for the Agent Studio. It must feature syntax highlighting for the Dana language and support file tab management for core agent files (`agent.dana`, `tools.dana`, `config.json`).
* **REPL/Terminal Component**: An interactive terminal emulator is required to host the Dana REPL and display real-time logs for debugging and agent execution.
* **Rendering Components**: High-fidelity rendering components are needed for various document types, including a dedicated PDF/Markdown Renderer and a standard **Video Player Component** with API access to track and control playback time for transcript synchronization.
* **Graph Visualization Component**: A suitable library (e.g., D3.js, vis.js) must be integrated to render the mini-map knowledge graph visualization within the Agent Studio, allowing users to visually manage their knowledge structure.
## 4. Performance and Scalability
The system must be engineered for high performance to ensure a seamless user experience.
* **Responsiveness**: The user interface must maintain high responsiveness, even when managing high data density and executing complex, concurrent agent orchestration tasks.
* **Indexing Speed**: The system must be optimized to quickly index new files and update knowledge graphs and embeddings with minimal latency, ensuring a near real-time knowledge update cycle.
* **Agent Latency**: Queries routed through the Orchestrator and Domain Agents must return results within an acceptable latency threshold to support a fluid, real-time chat and analysis experience.

42
docs/grok-chat/User Story: Media Processing and Agent Customization.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
# User Flow Example: Media Processing and Agent Customization
This document illustrates a critical user journey within the Advanced Second Brain PKM system, demonstrating the seamless integration of media processing, knowledge extraction, and the advanced capability of agent engineering and cross-domain querying.
## Scenario: Integrating a New Video Lecture and Customizing the Agent
The following steps detail how a user interacts with the system to ingest new media, extract insights, modify an agent's behavior, and execute a complex, cross-domain query.
### Step 1: Data Ingestion via Background Agent
The process begins with the user introducing new knowledge into the system.
1. **User Action**: The user acquires a new video lecture on neuroscience and places the file into the designated local directory for that domain, specifically within the `Neuroscience/Media` folder. This action leverages the system's core principle of **Local Data Sovereignty**.
2. **System Action**: The system's background **"Media Scraper Agent"** automatically detects the new file.
3. **System Action**: The agent initiates a transcription process, generating an interactive transcript file that is placed alongside the video. This transcript is synchronized with the video timeline, preparing the media for advanced analysis.
### Step 2: Knowledge Extraction in Knowledge Browser Mode
The user then moves to the application interface to engage with the newly ingested data.
1. **User Action**: The user navigates to the **Neuroscience Domain** using the Global Navigation Sidebar.
2. **User Action**: Within the **Knowledge Browser Mode**, the user selects the video file from **Pane 1: The Drawer**.
3. **System Action**: The video is displayed in **Pane 2: Content Viewer**, accompanied by the synchronized, interactive transcript.
4. **User Action**: To extract key insights, the user selects a "Fabric" pattern, such as "Extract Ideas," and clicks the corresponding button in **Pane 3: Insight/Fabric**.
5. **System Action**: The Neuroscience Agent processes the transcript, and the right pane is populated with structured, extracted bullet points, representing the key insights from the lecture.
### Step 3: Cross-Domain Agent Customization in Agent Studio Mode
Recognizing a connection between the new content and another domain, the user customizes the agent's logic.
1. **User Action**: The user switches to the **Agent Studio Mode** to access the agent's source code.
2. **User Action**: In the **Middle Panel (The Dana Editor)**, the user modifies the Dana agent's code. The modification explicitly instructs the Neuroscience Agent to seek connections to concepts like "neural networks" within the **CompSci Domain**'s knowledge base.
3. **User Action**: The user immediately tests the modified agent logic in the **Bottom Panel (The REPL & Logs)** using a command such as `dana> agent.query("test context")`, confirming the new cross-domain search capability.
### Step 4: Complex Query via Global Orchestrator Chat
Finally, the user leverages the system's multi-agent architecture to synthesize knowledge across domains.
1. **User Action**: The user navigates to the **Global Orchestrator Chat**.
2. **User Action**: In the **Domain Scope Selector**, the user explicitly checks the boxes for both **"Neuroscience"** and **"CompSci"**.
3. **User Action**: The user inputs a complex, cross-domain query: "How does the lecture I just watched relate to current LLM architecture?"
4. **System Action**: The Orchestrator Agent intelligently calls both the newly customized Neuroscience Agent and the CompSci Agent, synthesizes their respective findings, and delivers a comprehensive, integrated answer to the user.

1288
docs/grok-chat/ful-chat.md Normal file
View File

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff

27
docs/personal-notes/ImportantToMe.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
# These following rules are various points that I want to ensure make it into the end project
1. Privacy
- Local directories for user's knowledge ensuring they keep all data for themselves
- Usage of private locally ran models, capable and viable due to proper context engineering
2. Useful for anyone
- System designed for accelerating user's goals based on their current understanding
- System should have a proper ingestion/setup process & also should debrief the user daily
3. No goal should be too big nor too small.
4. All domains should be able to gather and utilize the highest level of information about the subject as possible
- Automated research engine
- Automated ingestion engine
- Automated expert agent improvements from data
5. Each different domain of knowledge is fully contained within a directory for that domain
- These directories are further enhanced with:
A). Sub-agents
B). Skills/Rules/System Prompt
C). Workflows / Tools / Functions
D). An expert chat UI per domain
E). Raw data (docs/transcripts/pdf/etc)
F). Processed data (fabric extractions, personal notes, etc.)
6. Each expert domain is 'agent as a tool'
7. All information should be properly rated and fact checked for optimal truth
8. Information between the user's personal knowledge and the wider knowledge of the world should be intertwined*
- This process should constantly be guiding the user towards a new subject they should study or pursue applying
9. System should be neuro-symbolic
*Need to refine exactly how to use weighted data and context engineering properly*

111
docs/plans/README.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
# Project Plans Directory
This directory contains comprehensive planning documentation for the Advanced Second Brain PKM System, organized to support effective project execution and stakeholder communication.
## Directory Structure
### `project-phases/`
Detailed breakdowns of each development phase with specific deliverables, timelines, and dependencies.
- `phase-1-foundation.md`: Backend infrastructure and core services
- `phase-2-core-ui.md`: UI development and knowledge browser
- `phase-3-advanced-features.md`: AI agents and intelligent features
- `phase-4-integration-optimization.md`: Performance optimization and integrations
- `phase-5-production-launch.md`: Production deployment and scaling
### `technical-implementation/`
Deep-dive technical specifications, architecture decisions, and implementation strategies.
### `user-journeys/`
End-to-end workflow documentation covering key user interactions and system behaviors.
### `risk-mitigation/`
Contingency planning, risk assessment, and mitigation strategies for potential blockers.
### `milestones/`
Success criteria, validation approaches, and measurable outcomes for each project milestone.
### `checklists/`
Practical checklists for development setup, testing, and deployment readiness.
### Additional Planning Documents
- `directory-structure-templates.md`: Standard directory structures for knowledge domains
- `default-config-structure.md`: Configuration directory layout and default settings
## Relationship to Other Documentation
This plans directory contains **actionable implementation plans** that build upon the foundational documents in the parent `docs/` directory:
- **`docs/personal-notes/ImportantToMe.md`**: Core principles and requirements that drive all planning
- **`docs/grok-chat/Functional Specification*.md`**: High-level functional requirements
- **`docs/grok-chat/Technical Requirements*.md`**: Technical requirements and constraints
- **`docs/grok-chat/User Story*.md`**: Narrative user journeys and scenarios
- **`docs/UI/UX Design Document*.md`**: UI/UX specifications and design principles
The plans here translate these requirements into **concrete, executable steps** with timelines, dependencies, and success criteria.
## Planning Philosophy
### Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture
Our system implements a revolutionary **dual manifold cognitive architecture** that models intelligence as the geometric intersection of individual and collective knowledge spaces:
- **Individual Manifold**: Personal cognitive trajectory with temporal evolution
- **Collective Manifold**: Domain expertise with social validation
- **Braiding Process**: Mathematical fusion of personal resonance (α) and collective feasibility (β)
### Subagent-Driven Development
Following the established pattern of using specialized subagents for complex tasks:
- **explore**: For codebase analysis and pattern discovery
- **code-task-executor**: For isolated coding tasks
- **project-completeness-auditor**: For validation and gap analysis
- **testing-agent**: For automated testing workflows
- **documentation-updater**: For maintaining documentation consistency
### Decision Framework
- **PRODUCTION BLOCKER** → Immediate priority (system crashes, data loss)
- **CORE FUNCTIONALITY** → High priority (primary user workflows)
- **INFRASTRUCTURE OPTIMIZATION** → Lowest priority (performance, scalability)
### Domain-Critical Validation
Always prioritize validating what we're building works over how efficiently we deliver it.
### Three-Layer Memory Architecture
- **Episodic Layer**: Raw content with hybrid indexing (dense + sparse)
- **Semantic Layer**: Temporal concept evolution and cognitive trajectories
- **Persona Layer**: Knowledge graphs with centrality measures and gravity wells
## Key Planning Principles
1. **Incremental Value Delivery**: Each phase delivers tangible user value
2. **Parallel Development**: Maximize concurrent workstreams where dependencies allow
3. **Early Validation**: Test critical assumptions (Dana runtime, file monitoring) early
4. **Flexible Scope**: Plan for MVP delivery after Phase 2 if needed
5. **Risk-First Approach**: Address technical risks before investing heavily in UI
## Critical Dependencies
- **Phase 1 → Phase 2**: Backend foundation required for functional UI
- **Dana Runtime**: Must be functional before agent development can begin
- **File System Integration**: Prerequisite for all user-facing features
- **API Contracts**: Clear interfaces between frontend/backend teams
## Success Metrics
- **Functional Completeness**: All core features implemented and tested
- **User Experience**: Intuitive workflows with acceptable performance
- **Technical Quality**: High test coverage, clean architecture
- **Documentation**: Comprehensive technical and user documentation
## Quick Start
1. Review `project-phases/phase-1-foundation.md` for infrastructure setup
2. Check `checklists/development-setup.md` for environment preparation
3. Use `milestones/mvp-definitions.md` to understand success criteria
4. Refer to `risk-mitigation/` for contingency planning
## Update Process
- Update plans after each completed milestone
- Review and adjust based on actual development velocity
- Document lessons learned and adjust future planning assumptions</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/README.md

173
docs/plans/checklists/development-setup.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
# Development Setup Checklist
This checklist ensures a consistent development environment across all team members and provides a quick start guide for new contributors.
## Prerequisites
- [ ] Python 3.10+ installed
- [ ] Node.js 18+ installed (for frontend development)
- [ ] Docker and Docker Compose installed
- [ ] Git configured with SSH keys
- [ ] VS Code or preferred IDE installed
## Environment Setup
### Backend Setup
- [ ] Clone repository: `git clone <repo-url>`
- [ ] Create virtual environment: `python -m venv venv`
- [ ] Activate environment: `source venv/bin/activate` (Linux/Mac) or `venv\Scripts\activate` (Windows)
- [ ] Install dependencies: `pip install -r requirements.txt`
- [ ] Install dev dependencies: `pip install -r requirements-dev.txt`
- [ ] Copy environment template: `cp .env.example .env`
- [ ] Configure API keys in `.env`:
- [ ] OPENAI_API_KEY
- [ ] OPENALEX_API_KEY (if using)
- [ ] HUGGINGFACE_TOKEN (if using local models)
### Frontend Setup
- [ ] Navigate to frontend directory: `cd frontend/`
- [ ] Install dependencies: `npm install`
- [ ] Copy environment template: `cp .env.example .env.local`
- [ ] Configure frontend environment variables
### Database Setup
- [ ] Choose database: Neo4j/Dgraph/local alternative
- [ ] Install database locally or configure cloud instance
- [ ] Update connection settings in `.env`
- [ ] Run database migrations/initialization scripts
## Development Tools
### Code Quality
- [ ] Install pre-commit hooks: `pre-commit install`
- [ ] Configure linting: `npm run lint` (frontend) or appropriate backend linter
- [ ] Set up type checking: `mypy` for Python, TypeScript for frontend
- [ ] Configure code formatting: Black for Python, Prettier for frontend
### Testing
- [ ] Install test dependencies
- [ ] Configure test database
- [ ] Run initial test suite: `pytest` (Python) or `npm test` (frontend)
- [ ] Set up test coverage reporting
### Documentation
- [ ] Install documentation tools (Sphinx for Python, etc.)
- [ ] Configure API documentation generation
- [ ] Set up documentation deployment (ReadTheDocs, etc.)
## Project Structure Validation
### Backend Structure
- [ ] Verify `src/` directory structure matches architecture
- [ ] Confirm `config/settings.py` loads correctly
- [ ] Test basic imports: `python -c "import src.episodic_memory"`
- [ ] Validate configuration loading
### Frontend Structure
- [ ] Verify component structure
- [ ] Test basic build: `npm run build`
- [ ] Confirm routing configuration
- [ ] Validate TypeScript compilation
## API and Integration Testing
### Backend API
- [ ] Start development server: `uvicorn api.server:app --reload`
- [ ] Test health endpoint: `curl http://localhost:8000/health`
- [ ] Verify API documentation: `http://localhost:8000/docs`
### Frontend-Backend Integration
- [ ] Start frontend dev server: `npm run dev`
- [ ] Test basic API calls from frontend
- [ ] Verify CORS configuration
- [ ] Test file upload endpoints
## Data Pipeline Testing
### Document Processing
- [ ] Place test PDF in `data/raw_documents/`
- [ ] Run document parser: `python -c "from src.episodic_memory.document_parser import DocumentParser; parser = DocumentParser(); chunks = parser.parse_directory('data/raw_documents'); print(f'Parsed {len(chunks)} chunks')"`
- [ ] Verify chunk creation and metadata extraction
### Embedding Service
- [ ] Test embedding generation
- [ ] Verify vector storage
- [ ] Test basic similarity search
## Agent Development Setup
### Dana Runtime
- [ ] Verify Dana language runtime installation
- [ ] Test basic Dana code execution
- [ ] Confirm REPL functionality
### Agent Framework
- [ ] Test agent loading and initialization
- [ ] Verify basic agent communication
- [ ] Confirm agent configuration loading
## Performance and Monitoring
### Logging
- [ ] Configure structured logging
- [ ] Set up log aggregation (if needed)
- [ ] Test error tracking and reporting
### Performance Monitoring
- [ ] Set up basic performance profiling
- [ ] Configure health checks
- [ ] Test resource usage monitoring
## Security and Privacy
### Local Data Sovereignty
- [ ] Verify all data paths are user-configurable
- [ ] Test file system permissions
- [ ] Confirm no external data leakage
### API Security
- [ ] Configure basic authentication (if needed)
- [ ] Test input validation
- [ ] Verify secure file handling
## Deployment Preparation
### Docker
- [ ] Build Docker image: `docker build -t second-brain .`
- [ ] Test container execution: `docker run -p 8000:8000 second-brain`
- [ ] Verify Docker Compose setup
### Production Configuration
- [ ] Create production environment template
- [ ] Configure production logging
- [ ] Set up production database connections
## Final Validation
- [ ] Run full test suite: `pytest --cov=src --cov-report=html`
- [ ] Perform integration testing
- [ ] Test end-to-end user workflows
- [ ] Validate performance requirements
- [ ] Confirm documentation is current
## Troubleshooting
### Common Issues
- **Import errors**: Check virtual environment activation and PYTHONPATH
- **Database connection failures**: Verify connection strings and credentials
- **API key issues**: Confirm environment variables are loaded correctly
- **Build failures**: Check Node.js/Python versions and dependency conflicts
### Getting Help
- Check existing issues in repository
- Review documentation in `docs/`
- Contact team lead for environment-specific issues
## Next Steps
After completing this checklist:
1. Start with Phase 1 foundation work
2. Set up daily standups and progress tracking
3. Begin implementing core backend services
4. Schedule regular architecture reviews</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/checklists/development-setup.md

268
docs/plans/checklists/testing-checklist.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
# Testing Checklist and Quality Assurance
This comprehensive testing checklist ensures the Advanced Second Brain PKM system meets quality standards across all development phases.
## Testing Strategy Overview
### Testing Pyramid
```
End-to-End Tests (10%)
Integration Tests (20%)
Unit Tests (70%)
```
### Testing Types
- **Unit Tests**: Individual functions and methods
- **Integration Tests**: Component interactions and API contracts
- **End-to-End Tests**: Complete user workflows
- **Performance Tests**: Load, stress, and scalability testing
- **Security Tests**: Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing
- **Accessibility Tests**: WCAG compliance and usability testing
## Development Setup Testing
### Environment Validation
- [ ] Python version compatibility (3.10+)
- [ ] Node.js version compatibility (18+)
- [ ] Docker and Docker Compose installation
- [ ] Database connectivity (Neo4j/Dgraph)
- [ ] API key configuration validation
- [ ] Virtual environment isolation
- [ ] Dependency version conflicts resolution
### Build System Testing
- [ ] Backend build process (`pip install -r requirements.txt`)
- [ ] Frontend build process (`npm install && npm run build`)
- [ ] Docker image building without errors
- [ ] Development server startup
- [ ] Hot reload functionality
- [ ] Production build optimization
## Unit Testing Requirements
### Backend Unit Tests
- [ ] All service classes have >80% coverage
- [ ] File system operations (read, write, watch)
- [ ] Dana runtime execution and validation
- [ ] Knowledge graph CRUD operations
- [ ] Embedding generation and search
- [ ] API endpoint request/response handling
- [ ] Error handling and edge cases
- [ ] Configuration loading and validation
### Frontend Unit Tests
- [ ] React component rendering
- [ ] State management (if applicable)
- [ ] Utility functions and helpers
- [ ] API client functions
- [ ] Form validation logic
- [ ] UI interaction handlers
### Test Quality Standards
- [ ] Tests are isolated (no external dependencies)
- [ ] Tests use descriptive names and follow AAA pattern
- [ ] Mock external services appropriately
- [ ] Test both success and failure scenarios
- [ ] Include edge cases and boundary conditions
## Integration Testing
### API Integration Tests
- [ ] All REST endpoints return correct status codes
- [ ] Request/response schemas match OpenAPI spec
- [ ] Authentication and authorization work correctly
- [ ] Error responses follow consistent format
- [ ] CORS headers configured properly
- [ ] Rate limiting functions as expected
### Database Integration Tests
- [ ] Connection pooling works correctly
- [ ] Migrations run without errors
- [ ] CRUD operations maintain data integrity
- [ ] Concurrent access doesn't cause race conditions
- [ ] Backup and recovery procedures work
- [ ] Query performance meets requirements
### Service Integration Tests
- [ ] File system service integrates with document processing
- [ ] Dana runtime integrates with agent management
- [ ] Knowledge graph integrates with embedding service
- [ ] All services handle service failures gracefully
- [ ] Message queues and background jobs work correctly
## End-to-End Testing
### Critical User Journeys
- [ ] User creates new domain and adds documents
- [ ] User browses knowledge in Knowledge Browser
- [ ] User processes media file with transcription
- [ ] User runs Fabric analysis patterns
- [ ] User customizes agent in Agent Studio
- [ ] User performs cross-domain queries
### Data Flow Testing
- [ ] File upload → processing → storage → retrieval
- [ ] Document chunking → embedding → indexing → search
- [ ] Agent code editing → validation → execution → results
- [ ] Graph updates → visualization → query results
### Cross-Browser Testing
- [ ] Chrome/Chromium (primary target)
- [ ] Firefox (secondary target)
- [ ] Safari (macOS users)
- [ ] Edge (Windows users)
- [ ] Mobile browsers (iOS Safari, Chrome Mobile)
## Performance Testing
### Load Testing
- [ ] API endpoints handle 100 concurrent users
- [ ] File processing scales to 10 simultaneous uploads
- [ ] Search queries return results in <500ms
- [ ] Page loads complete in <2 seconds
- [ ] Memory usage stays within limits
### Stress Testing
- [ ] System handles sudden traffic spikes
- [ ] Large file uploads (1GB+) don't crash system
- [ ] Database handles 10,000+ nodes/edges
- [ ] Long-running processes can be cancelled
- [ ] System recovers from service failures
### Scalability Testing
- [ ] Horizontal scaling with multiple instances
- [ ] Database read replicas work correctly
- [ ] CDN integration for static assets
- [ ] Background job queues scale appropriately
## Security Testing
### Authentication & Authorization
- [ ] API keys are validated correctly
- [ ] File access respects user permissions
- [ ] Agent execution is sandboxed
- [ ] No privilege escalation possible
### Data Protection
- [ ] Local data sovereignty maintained
- [ ] No data sent to external servers without consent
- [ ] Encryption at rest for sensitive data
- [ ] Secure deletion of temporary files
### Vulnerability Assessment
- [ ] OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities checked
- [ ] Dependency vulnerability scanning
- [ ] Input validation prevents injection attacks
- [ ] HTTPS everywhere in production
## Accessibility Testing
### WCAG Compliance
- [ ] Keyboard navigation works throughout application
- [ ] Screen reader compatibility
- [ ] Color contrast meets WCAG AA standards
- [ ] Focus indicators are visible
- [ ] Semantic HTML structure
### Usability Testing
- [ ] User interface is intuitive for target users
- [ ] Error messages are helpful and actionable
- [ ] Loading states provide appropriate feedback
- [ ] Responsive design works on mobile devices
## Automated Testing Infrastructure
### CI/CD Pipeline Testing
- [ ] All tests run on every commit
- [ ] Test failures block deployment
- [ ] Code coverage reports generated
- [ ] Performance regression detection
- [ ] Security scanning integrated
### Test Data Management
- [ ] Test databases reset between test runs
- [ ] Realistic test data fixtures available
- [ ] Sensitive data masked in test environments
- [ ] Test data doesn't leak into production
## Manual Testing Checklists
### Pre-Release Testing
- [ ] All automated tests pass
- [ ] Critical user journeys tested manually
- [ ] Cross-browser compatibility verified
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met
- [ ] Security scan clean
- [ ] Accessibility audit passed
### User Acceptance Testing
- [ ] Representative users can complete primary tasks
- [ ] User feedback incorporated into fixes
- [ ] Edge cases identified and handled
- [ ] Documentation reviewed by users
- [ ] Beta testing period completed successfully
## Bug Tracking and Management
### Bug Classification
- **Critical**: System crashes, data loss, security issues
- **High**: Major functionality broken, poor performance
- **Medium**: Minor functionality issues, UI problems
- **Low**: Cosmetic issues, minor annoyances
### Bug Fix Process
- [ ] Bug reported with reproduction steps
- [ ] Bug triaged and prioritized
- [ ] Test case added to prevent regression
- [ ] Fix implemented and tested
- [ ] Code review completed
- [ ] Fix deployed and verified
## Quality Gates
### Code Quality Gates
- [ ] Code coverage >80% for new code
- [ ] No critical security vulnerabilities
- [ ] Code style checks pass
- [ ] Type checking passes (mypy, TypeScript)
- [ ] Documentation updated for API changes
### Release Quality Gates
- [ ] All critical and high-priority bugs fixed
- [ ] Performance requirements met
- [ ] Security review completed
- [ ] User acceptance testing passed
- [ ] Rollback plan documented
## Monitoring and Maintenance
### Production Monitoring
- [ ] Error tracking and alerting configured
- [ ] Performance monitoring dashboards
- [ ] User analytics and usage tracking
- [ ] Automated health checks
- [ ] Log aggregation and analysis
### Test Maintenance
- [ ] Tests updated when code changes
- [ ] Flaky tests identified and fixed
- [ ] Test data kept current
- [ ] Test infrastructure maintained
- [ ] Test coverage monitored over time
## Success Metrics
### Test Quality Metrics
- **Coverage**: >80% code coverage maintained
- **Reliability**: >95% of tests pass consistently
- **Speed**: Test suite runs in <5 minutes
- **Maintenance**: <5% of tests require regular updates
### Quality Metrics
- **Defect Density**: <0.5 bugs per 1000 lines of code
- **Mean Time to Resolution**: <24 hours for critical bugs
- **User Satisfaction**: >90% user acceptance testing success
- **Performance**: All SLAs met in production
This comprehensive testing strategy ensures the Advanced Second Brain PKM system delivers high-quality, reliable functionality that meets user needs and maintains security and performance standards.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/checklists/testing-checklist.md

22
docs/plans/dana-reference.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
# Dana Language Reference
## File Extension
- **Correct Extension**: `.na` (not `.dana`)
- **Example**: `agent.na`, `tools.na`, `researcher.na`
## Official Repository
- **GitHub**: https://github.com/aitomatic/dana
- **Description**: Agent-native programming language for building fast, expert AI agents
## Key Concepts
- **Structs**: Data containers for agent states and knowledge
- **Resources**: Storage systems (local FS, databases)
- **Agent Blueprints**: Modular agent templates
- **Struct Functions**: Pure operations on data
- **Resource Functions**: Strict interactions with storage
## Integration Points
- **Runtime**: Python-compatible for embedding
- **Studio**: IDE for drafting agents and workflows
- **REPL**: Interactive testing environment
- **File Types**: `.na` files for agent logic and configurations

226
docs/plans/default-config-structure.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
# Default Configuration Directory Structure
The `.config/think_bigger/` directory contains global configuration, templates, and default settings for the Advanced Second Brain PKM system.
```
.config/
└── think_bigger/
├── config.json # Global system configuration
├── domains/ # Domain templates and defaults
│ ├── default-domain/ # Template for new domains
│ │ ├── _meta/
│ │ ├── inbox/
│ │ ├── notes/
│ │ └── README.md
│ └── domain-types/ # Specialized domain templates
│ ├── research/
│ ├── development/
│ ├── personal/
│ └── business/
├── agents/ # Global AI agents
│ ├── system/ # Core system agents
│ │ ├── file-watcher.na
│ │ ├── indexer.na
│ │ └── maintenance.na
│ ├── user/ # User-customizable agents
│ └── templates/ # Agent templates
├── templates/ # Global templates
│ ├── notes/
│ ├── projects/
│ └── domains/
├── themes/ # UI themes and styles
├── plugins/ # Extension system
├── backups/ # Configuration backups
└── logs/ # System logs
```
## Configuration Files
### config.json
```json
{
"version": "1.0.0",
"system": {
"data_directory": "~/think_bigger_data",
"backup_directory": "~/think_bigger_backups",
"log_level": "INFO",
"auto_backup": true,
"backup_frequency": "daily"
},
"processing": {
"embedding_model": "sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2",
"chunk_size": 512,
"overlap": 50,
"max_file_size": "100MB",
"supported_formats": ["pdf", "md", "txt", "html", "docx"]
},
"ui": {
"theme": "dark",
"font_size": "medium",
"sidebar_width": 300,
"graph_layout": "force",
"default_view": "graph"
},
"agents": {
"enabled": true,
"max_concurrent": 3,
"timeout": 300,
"sandbox": true
},
"integrations": {
"notion": {
"enabled": false,
"api_key": "",
"database_id": ""
},
"obsidian": {
"enabled": false,
"vault_path": ""
}
}
}
```
## Domain Templates
### Default Domain Template
Each domain type has a complete template structure:
```
default-domain/
├── _meta/
│ ├── domain-config.json
│ ├── agents/
│ │ ├── researcher.na
│ │ └── organizer.na
│ └── templates/
│ ├── note.md
│ └── project.md
├── inbox/
├── notes/
│ ├── concepts/
│ ├── projects/
│ ├── research/
│ └── references/
└── README.md
```
### Specialized Templates
#### Research Domain
- Additional folders: `papers/`, `experiments/`, `datasets/`
- Specialized agents: `literature-review.na`, `data-analyzer.na`
- Templates: `research-note.md`, `experiment-log.md`
#### Development Domain
- Additional folders: `code/`, `docs/`, `tests/`
- Specialized agents: `code-reviewer.na`, `documentation-generator.na`
- Templates: `feature-spec.md`, `api-doc.md`
## Agent System
### System Agents
Core agents that run automatically:
- **file-watcher.na**: Monitors file system changes
- **indexer.na**: Maintains search index and knowledge graph
- **maintenance.na**: Performs cleanup and optimization tasks
### User Agents
Customizable agents for specific workflows:
- **researcher.na**: Automated information gathering
- **summarizer.na**: Content condensation
- **connector.na**: Relationship discovery
- **questioner.na**: Q&A processing
## Template System
### Template Categories
- **Notes**: Daily notes, meeting notes, research notes
- **Projects**: Project plans, task lists, progress reports
- **Domains**: Domain setup, README files, configuration
### Template Variables
Support for dynamic content:
- `{{date}}`: Current date
- `{{domain}}`: Domain name
- `{{user}}`: Current user
- `{{title}}`: Document title
## Theme System
### Available Themes
- **Light**: Clean, minimal design
- **Dark**: Easy on the eyes for long sessions
- **Auto**: Follows system preference
- **Custom**: User-defined color schemes
### Theme Configuration
```json
{
"name": "Custom Dark",
"colors": {
"primary": "#6366f1",
"secondary": "#8b5cf6",
"background": "#0f0f0f",
"surface": "#1a1a1a",
"text": "#ffffff",
"text-secondary": "#a1a1aa"
},
"typography": {
"font-family": "Inter, sans-serif",
"font-size-base": "16px",
"line-height": 1.6
}
}
```
## Plugin System
### Plugin Types
- **Importers**: Custom content import formats
- **Exporters**: Custom export destinations
- **Processors**: Content processing pipelines
- **Views**: Custom UI components
- **Agents**: Additional AI agent types
### Plugin Structure
```
plugins/
├── my-plugin/
│ ├── plugin.json
│ ├── main.js
│ ├── agents/
│ └── templates/
```
## Backup and Recovery
### Automatic Backups
- Configuration files backed up daily
- Knowledge graph snapshots weekly
- Full system backup monthly
### Recovery Options
- Point-in-time restore
- Selective domain recovery
- Configuration rollback
- Emergency mode startup
## Logging and Monitoring
### Log Categories
- **System**: Core application logs
- **Agents**: AI agent execution logs
- **Processing**: Content processing logs
- **User**: User action logs
- **Errors**: Error and exception logs
### Monitoring Metrics
- System performance
- Agent success rates
- Content processing statistics
- User engagement metrics
- Error rates and types</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/default-config-structure.md

168
docs/plans/directory-structure-templates.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
# Directory Structure Templates
This document defines the standard directory structure templates for the Advanced Second Brain PKM system. These templates ensure consistency across knowledge domains and provide a framework for organizing information effectively.
## Domain Directory Template
Each knowledge domain should follow this standardized structure:
```
domain-name/
├── _meta/
│ ├── domain-config.json # Domain-specific configuration
│ ├── agents/ # Domain-specific AI agents
│ │ ├── researcher.na
│ │ ├── summarizer.na
│ │ └── curator.na
│ └── templates/ # Domain-specific templates
│ ├── note-template.md
│ └── project-template.md
├── archive/ # Archived content
├── assets/ # Images, documents, media
├── inbox/ # New content entry point
├── notes/ # Processed knowledge
│ ├── concepts/ # Core concepts and definitions
│ ├── projects/ # Active projects and tasks
│ ├── research/ # Research materials and findings
│ └── references/ # External references and citations
├── projects/ # Project-specific directories
│ └── project-name/
│ ├── _meta/
│ ├── assets/
│ ├── notes/
│ └── deliverables/
└── README.md # Domain overview and navigation
```
## File Naming Conventions
### Documents and Notes
- Use kebab-case for filenames: `knowledge-graph-implementation.md`
- Include dates for time-sensitive content: `2024-01-15-meeting-notes.md`
- Use descriptive prefixes for categorization: `concept-neural-networks.md`
### Directories
- Use lowercase with hyphens: `machine-learning-concepts/`
- Group related items: `research-papers/`, `code-examples/`
## Content Organization Principles
### _meta/ Directory
Contains domain configuration and automation:
- `domain-config.json`: Domain settings, tags, relationships
- `agents/`: Dana agents specific to this domain
- `templates/`: Reusable templates for consistent formatting
### Content Flow
1. **Inbox**: Raw content enters here (imports, captures, notes)
2. **Processing**: Content gets reviewed, tagged, and organized
3. **Notes**: Processed knowledge with connections and insights
4. **Archive**: Historical content maintained for reference
### Project Structure
Projects get dedicated subdirectories with full structure:
- Independent knowledge management
- Isolated from main domain
- Can be promoted to separate domains if they grow
## Template Files
### domain-config.json
```json
{
"name": "Domain Name",
"description": "Brief description of the domain",
"tags": ["tag1", "tag2"],
"relationships": {
"parent_domains": [],
"child_domains": [],
"related_domains": []
},
"agents": {
"default_researcher": "researcher.na",
"default_summarizer": "summarizer.na"
},
"settings": {
"auto_tag": true,
"auto_link": true,
"backup_frequency": "daily"
}
}
```
### README.md Template
```markdown
# Domain Name
Brief description of what this domain contains and its purpose.
## Quick Start
- How to add new content
- Key concepts and navigation
- Important agents and automations
## Structure
- `inbox/`: New content entry point
- `notes/`: Processed knowledge
- `projects/`: Active work
- `archive/`: Historical content
## Key Topics
- Topic 1
- Topic 2
- Topic 3
## Related Domains
- [Related Domain 1](../related-domain-1/)
- [Related Domain 2](../related-domain-2/)
```
## Automation Integration
### Agent Placement
- Domain-specific agents in `_meta/agents/`
- General-purpose agents in global config
- Project-specific agents override domain defaults
### Template System
- Templates stored in `_meta/templates/`
- Support for variables and dynamic content
- Version control for template evolution
## Maintenance Guidelines
### Regular Tasks
- Weekly: Review inbox and process new content
- Monthly: Archive old projects and clean up structure
- Quarterly: Review and update domain relationships
### Quality Checks
- Ensure consistent naming conventions
- Verify link integrity
- Update README files when structure changes
- Validate agent configurations
## Scaling Considerations
### Large Domains
- Split into sub-domains when >1000 files
- Use index files for navigation
- Implement automated organization rules
### Cross-Domain Links
- Use relative paths for internal links
- Maintain relationship metadata
- Implement global search across domains
## Tool Integration
### File System Monitoring
- Watch `_meta/` for configuration changes
- Trigger reprocessing on structure changes
- Auto-generate navigation files
### Knowledge Graph
- Map directory structure to graph nodes
- Create relationships based on file links
- Generate domain-specific graph views</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/directory-structure-templates.md

201
docs/plans/knowledge-incorporation-strategy.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
# Knowledge Incorporation Strategy: Dual Manifold Learning Architecture
Based on the AI Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture analysis, here's how we can incorporate the user's knowledge to suggest mathematically optimal learning paths:
## Core Concept: Learning Manifolds
Instead of treating knowledge as flat vectors, we model learning as **dual manifolds**:
- **Individual Learning Manifold**: Your current knowledge trajectory and comfort zones
- **Domain Opportunity Manifold**: Available learning opportunities and goal-aligned topics
## Mathematical Framework for Learning Suggestions
### 1. Knowledge Gap Analysis
```
Current_Knowledge_Manifold ∩ Goal_Domain_Manifold = Learning_Path_Vector
```
**Algorithm:**
- Map your current knowledge to a manifold representation
- Map desired goals to target knowledge regions
- Find geodesic paths (shortest learning trajectories) between manifolds
- Calculate learning difficulty gradients
### 2. Cognitive Load Optimization
```
Learning_Efficiency = α × Knowledge_Resonance + β × Goal_Alignment + γ × Difficulty_Gradient
```
**Where:**
- `α` = How well new topic connects to existing knowledge
- `β` = How directly it advances your goals
- `γ` = Learning curve steepness (negative for steep curves)
### 3. Temporal Learning Trajectories
```
Optimal_Path(t) = argmax ∫ [Knowledge_Growth_Rate - Cognitive_Load] dt
```
**Implementation:**
- Track learning velocity over time
- Predict knowledge retention curves
- Optimize for sustainable learning rates
## System Architecture for Your PKM
### Individual Learning Manifold Construction
```python
class LearningManifold:
def __init__(self):
self.knowledge_nodes = {} # Concept nodes with embeddings
self.learning_trajectory = [] # Temporal learning path
self.comfort_zones = {} # High-confidence knowledge regions
def add_knowledge(self, concept, confidence, timestamp):
"""Add knowledge point to manifold"""
embedding = self.embed_concept(concept)
node = KnowledgeNode(concept, embedding, confidence, timestamp)
self.knowledge_nodes[concept] = node
self.update_trajectory(node)
def calculate_learning_gradient(self, target_concept):
"""Calculate difficulty of learning new concept"""
# Find closest known concepts
# Calculate semantic distance
# Estimate learning time based on distance
pass
```
### Goal-Aligned Opportunity Manifold
```python
class OpportunityManifold:
def __init__(self):
self.opportunity_nodes = {} # Available learning topics
self.goal_vectors = {} # Target knowledge states
def add_goal(self, goal_description):
"""Add learning goal to manifold"""
goal_embedding = self.embed_goal(goal_description)
self.goal_vectors[goal_description] = goal_embedding
def find_bridge_concepts(self, current_knowledge):
"""Find concepts that bridge current knowledge to goals"""
# Calculate manifold intersection
# Find optimal bridge points
# Return ranked learning suggestions
pass
```
### Braiding Engine for Learning Optimization
```python
class LearningBraider:
def __init__(self, learning_manifold, opportunity_manifold):
self.learning = learning_manifold
self.opportunities = opportunity_manifold
def suggest_next_topic(self):
"""Find mathematically optimal next learning topic"""
# Calculate individual resonance (α)
alpha = self.calculate_knowledge_resonance()
# Calculate goal feasibility (β)
beta = self.calculate_goal_alignment()
# Apply structural gate
braided_score = self.structural_gate(alpha, beta)
# Return optimal learning suggestion
return self.get_top_suggestion(braided_score)
```
## Integration with Your Think Bigger System
### Phase 1 Enhancement: Knowledge Modeling
Add to your existing Phase 1 foundation:
```python
# In src/core/knowledge_model.py
class KnowledgeModel:
def __init__(self):
self.learning_manifold = LearningManifold()
self.opportunity_manifold = OpportunityManifold()
self.braiding_engine = LearningBraider(
self.learning_manifold,
self.opportunity_manifold
)
def process_user_input(self, content, context="learning"):
"""Process user content into knowledge manifold"""
if context == "learning":
self.learning_manifold.add_knowledge(content)
elif context == "goal":
self.opportunity_manifold.add_goal(content)
```
### API Enhancement: Learning Suggestions
Add to your FastAPI endpoints:
```python
# In src/api/endpoints/learning.py
@router.get("/learning/suggestions")
async def get_learning_suggestions(user_id: str, limit: int = 5):
"""Get mathematically optimal learning suggestions"""
knowledge_model = get_user_knowledge_model(user_id)
suggestions = knowledge_model.braiding_engine.suggest_next_topic()
return {"suggestions": suggestions[:limit]}
```
## Practical Implementation Steps
### 1. Knowledge Base Construction
- Parse your existing notes and documents
- Extract concepts and relationships
- Build initial learning manifold
- Identify knowledge gaps
### 2. Goal Integration
- Define your major goals mathematically
- Map goals to knowledge requirements
- Create opportunity manifold
### 3. Learning Path Optimization
- Implement braiding algorithm
- Calculate optimal learning sequences
- Provide actionable suggestions
### 4. Continuous Learning
- Track learning progress
- Update manifolds dynamically
- Refine suggestions based on outcomes
## Expected Benefits
### Mathematical Optimization
- **Gap Analysis**: Precisely identify what you don't know but should
- **Path Efficiency**: Find shortest routes to goals
- **Load Balancing**: Optimize learning difficulty curves
### Cognitive Benefits
- **Reduced Overwhelm**: Only suggest truly bridgeable concepts
- **Confidence Building**: Start with high-resonance topics
- **Goal Alignment**: Every suggestion advances your objectives
### Practical Benefits
- **Time Savings**: Focus learning on high-impact topics
- **Retention**: Better learning through optimal sequencing
- **Motivation**: Clear progress toward goals
## Integration Points with Your Current System
1. **Document Processing**: Enhance with concept extraction
2. **Knowledge Graph**: Add learning trajectory analysis
3. **Search**: Include learning path suggestions
4. **Goals**: Mathematically optimize goal achievement paths
This approach transforms your PKM from a storage system into an **intelligent learning companion** that mathematically optimizes your knowledge acquisition for maximum goal achievement.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/knowledge-incorporation-strategy.md

227
docs/plans/milestones/mvp-definitions.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
# MVP Definitions and Success Criteria
This document defines what constitutes a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) at different stages of development, providing clear success criteria and decision points for scope adjustment.
## MVP Philosophy
Our MVP approach focuses on delivering **tangible user value** at each milestone, allowing for early user feedback and course correction. We prioritize **core functionality** over advanced features, ensuring users can accomplish primary knowledge management tasks.
## MVP Level 1: Foundation Validation (End of Phase 1)
**Timeline**: Week 4
**Goal**: Validate that core technical assumptions are sound
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Backend API serves all documented endpoints
- [ ] File system monitoring detects changes reliably
- [ ] Document processing extracts text and metadata accurately
- [ ] Dana runtime executes basic agent code safely
- [ ] Knowledge graph stores and retrieves data correctly
- [ ] Embedding service generates vectors for similarity search
- [ ] All services integrate without critical errors
- [ ] API documentation is complete and accurate
### User Value Delivered
- **None directly** - This is infrastructure validation
- **Developer Value**: Confidence that technical foundation is solid
### Go/No-Go Decision
- **GO**: Proceed to Phase 2 UI development
- **NO-GO**: Reassess technical approach, consider alternative technologies
## MVP Level 2: Functional Knowledge Browser (End of Phase 2)
**Timeline**: Week 8
**Goal**: Deliver a working knowledge management interface
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Users can navigate local file directories
- [ ] Documents (PDF, Markdown, text) display correctly
- [ ] Basic file tree navigation works
- [ ] Content renders in readable format
- [ ] Dashboard shows domain overview
- [ ] Global navigation functions properly
- [ ] UI is responsive and follows design system
- [ ] No critical performance issues (<2s load times)
### User Value Delivered
- [ ] **Primary**: Browse and read documents in organized domains
- [ ] **Secondary**: Get overview of knowledge landscape
- [ ] **Validation**: Users can accomplish basic PKM tasks
### Key Features Included
- [ ] Global Navigation Sidebar
- [ ] Dashboard with Domain Grid
- [ ] Knowledge Browser (3-pane layout)
- [ ] File tree navigation
- [ ] Document rendering (PDF, Markdown)
- [ ] Basic content viewer
### Features Explicitly Deferred
- [ ] Video player integration
- [ ] Agent customization
- [ ] Cross-domain queries
- [ ] Advanced analysis patterns
- [ ] Media transcription
### Go/No-Go Decision
- **GO**: Launch beta with power users, proceed to Phase 3
- **NO-GO**: Focus on UI/UX improvements, delay advanced features
## MVP Level 3: Intelligent Content Processing (End of Phase 3)
**Timeline**: Week 12
**Goal**: Add automated content analysis and processing
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Media files are automatically detected and processed
- [ ] Transcripts are generated and synchronized
- [ ] Fabric analysis patterns extract insights
- [ ] Domain agents process content intelligently
- [ ] Analysis results display in UI
- [ ] Background processing doesn't impact user experience
- [ ] Content processing accuracy >80%
### User Value Delivered
- [ ] **Primary**: Automatic content analysis and insight extraction
- [ ] **Secondary**: Media content becomes searchable and analyzable
- [ ] **Validation**: System demonstrates AI value proposition
### Key Features Added
- [ ] Media Scraper Agent
- [ ] Video transcript generation
- [ ] Synchronized video transcripts
- [ ] Fabric analysis patterns (Extract Ideas, Summarize, etc.)
- [ ] Domain agent integration
- [ ] Background processing queue
### Go/No-Go Decision
- **GO**: System shows clear AI value, proceed to developer tools
- **NO-GO**: Focus on content processing quality, consider simplified AI approach
## MVP Level 4: Developer Experience (End of Phase 4)
**Timeline**: Week 16
**Goal**: Enable agent customization and development
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Agent Studio loads and functions
- [ ] Dana code editor works with syntax highlighting
- [ ] Users can modify and test agent code
- [ ] REPL executes Dana commands correctly
- [ ] Agent configuration saves and loads
- [ ] Basic graph visualization displays
- [ ] Agent testing workflow is functional
### User Value Delivered
- [ ] **Primary**: Power users can customize agent behavior
- [ ] **Secondary**: System becomes extensible and adaptable
- [ ] **Validation**: Advanced users can tailor system to their needs
### Key Features Added
- [ ] Agent Studio IDE
- [ ] Dana code editor
- [ ] Interactive REPL
- [ ] Context & Graph Manager
- [ ] Agent configuration interface
- [ ] Basic testing capabilities
### Go/No-Go Decision
- **GO**: Developer community can extend system, proceed to orchestration
- **NO-GO**: Simplify customization interface, focus on presets
## MVP Level 5: Full System Orchestration (End of Phase 5)
**Timeline**: Week 20
**Goal**: Complete multi-agent cross-domain system
### Success Criteria
- [ ] Global Orchestrator Chat functions
- [ ] Domain scope selection works
- [ ] Multi-agent queries return coherent responses
- [ ] Response synthesis is accurate
- [ ] Cross-domain agent communication works
- [ ] System handles concurrent queries
- [ ] Performance remains acceptable under load
### User Value Delivered
- [ ] **Primary**: Complex cross-domain knowledge queries
- [ ] **Secondary**: Unified interface to entire knowledge base
- [ ] **Validation**: System fulfills original vision
### Key Features Added
- [ ] Global Orchestrator Chat
- [ ] Agent orchestration logic
- [ ] Response synthesis
- [ ] Cross-domain communication
- [ ] Query routing and optimization
## Alternative MVP Scenarios
### Conservative MVP (Phase 2 Only)
**When to choose**: Technical challenges in Phase 1, limited resources
- Deliver functional knowledge browser
- Focus on core PKM value
- Defer AI features to future versions
- **Success**: Users can manage knowledge effectively
### AI-Focused MVP (Phases 1-3)
**When to choose**: Strong AI capabilities, user demand for intelligence
- Deliver content processing and analysis
- Skip full developer tooling initially
- **Success**: System demonstrates clear AI differentiation
### Developer MVP (Phases 1-4)
**When to choose**: Developer community focus, extensibility priority
- Deliver agent customization capabilities
- Defer full orchestration complexity
- **Success**: System becomes programmable and extensible
## Success Metrics by MVP Level
| Metric | MVP 1 | MVP 2 | MVP 3 | MVP 4 | MVP 5 |
|--------|-------|-------|-------|-------|-------|
| User Acquisition | N/A | 10 beta users | 50 active users | 100+ users | 500+ users |
| Daily Active Usage | N/A | 30 min/day | 60 min/day | 90 min/day | 120 min/day |
| Feature Completeness | 60% | 75% | 85% | 95% | 100% |
| Performance (p95) | N/A | <2s | <3s | <4s | <5s |
| Error Rate | <5% | <2% | <1% | <0.5% | <0.1% |
| User Satisfaction | N/A | >7/10 | >8/10 | >8.5/10 | >9/10 |
## Decision Framework for MVP Adjustments
### When to Expand Scope
- [ ] User feedback strongly positive
- [ ] Technical foundation exceeds expectations
- [ ] Additional resources become available
- [ ] Market opportunity expands
### When to Contract Scope
- [ ] Technical blockers discovered
- [ ] User feedback indicates different priorities
- [ ] Resource constraints emerge
- [ ] Market validation suggests pivot needed
### Pivot Indicators
- [ ] Users don't engage with core functionality
- [ ] Technical assumptions prove invalid
- [ ] Market has changed significantly
- [ ] Better opportunities identified
## Post-MVP Planning
After achieving any MVP level:
1. **Immediate**: Gather user feedback and usage analytics
2. **Short-term**: Address critical bugs and usability issues
3. **Medium-term**: Plan next feature set based on user needs
4. **Long-term**: Consider architectural improvements and scaling
## Communication Plan
For each MVP achievement:
- [ ] Internal team celebration and retrospective
- [ ] User announcement with clear value proposition
- [ ] Feature roadmap communication
- [ ] Feedback collection mechanism
- [ ] Success metrics reporting</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/milestones/mvp-definitions.md

251
docs/plans/milestones/validation-criteria.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
# Validation Criteria and Success Metrics
This document defines measurable criteria for validating the success of each project phase and the overall Advanced Second Brain PKM system.
## Validation Framework
### Validation Types
- **Technical Validation**: Code quality, performance, security
- **Functional Validation**: Features work as specified
- **User Validation**: Real users can accomplish tasks
- **Business Validation**: Value delivered meets objectives
### Validation Methods
- **Automated Testing**: Unit, integration, and end-to-end tests
- **Manual Testing**: User acceptance testing and exploratory testing
- **Performance Testing**: Load, stress, and scalability testing
- **User Research**: Surveys, interviews, and usability testing
- **Analytics**: Usage metrics and behavioral data
## Phase 1: Foundation Validation
### Technical Validation
- [ ] **API Availability**: All documented endpoints respond correctly
- *Measure*: 100% of endpoints return 200-299 status codes
- *Method*: Automated API tests
- *Success Threshold*: 100% pass rate
- [ ] **Service Integration**: All services communicate properly
- *Measure*: Cross-service API calls succeed
- *Method*: Integration test suite
- *Success Threshold*: >95% pass rate
- [ ] **Data Persistence**: Database operations maintain integrity
- *Measure*: CRUD operations work without data corruption
- *Method*: Database integration tests
- *Success Threshold*: 100% data integrity
### Performance Validation
- [ ] **Response Times**: API endpoints meet latency requirements
- *Measure*: P95 response time <500ms for all endpoints
- *Method*: Load testing with 50 concurrent users
- *Success Threshold*: <500ms P95, <2s P99
- [ ] **Resource Usage**: System operates within resource limits
- *Measure*: Memory usage <2GB, CPU <50% under normal load
- *Method*: Performance monitoring during testing
- *Success Threshold*: Within defined limits
### Security Validation
- [ ] **Sandboxing**: Dana execution is properly isolated
- *Measure*: Malicious code cannot access host system
- *Method*: Security testing with known exploits
- *Success Threshold*: 100% isolation maintained
- [ ] **Data Sovereignty**: No data leaks to external services
- *Measure*: Network traffic analysis shows no unauthorized data transmission
- *Method*: Network monitoring and traffic analysis
- *Success Threshold*: Zero unauthorized data transmission
## Phase 2: Knowledge Browser Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **File Navigation**: Users can browse domain directories
- *Measure*: File tree loads and navigation works
- *Method*: Manual testing with 10+ domain structures
- *Success Threshold*: 100% navigation success rate
- [ ] **Document Rendering**: Various file types display correctly
- *Measure*: PDF, Markdown, text files render properly
- *Method*: Test with diverse document types and sizes
- *Success Threshold*: >95% rendering success rate
- [ ] **UI Responsiveness**: Interface works across devices
- *Measure*: Layout adapts to screen sizes 1024px to 3840px
- *Method*: Cross-device testing (desktop, tablet, mobile)
- *Success Threshold*: No layout breaks, all interactions work
### User Validation
- [ ] **Task Completion**: Users can complete primary workflows
- *Measure*: Time to complete "browse and read document" task
- *Method*: User testing with 10 participants
- *Success Threshold*: >80% complete task in <5 minutes
- [ ] **Intuitive Navigation**: Users understand interface without training
- *Measure*: Navigation success rate without hints
- *Method*: Usability testing with first-time users
- *Success Threshold*: >70% successful navigation
## Phase 3: Content Processing Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **Media Processing**: Files are automatically detected and processed
- *Measure*: Processing success rate for supported formats
- *Method*: Test with 20+ media files of various types
- *Success Threshold*: >90% processing success rate
- [ ] **Transcript Quality**: Generated transcripts are accurate
- *Measure*: Word error rate (WER) for transcriptions
- *Method*: Compare against human-transcribed samples
- *Success Threshold*: <10% WER for clear audio
- [ ] **Analysis Accuracy**: Fabric patterns produce useful results
- *Measure*: User-rated usefulness of analysis outputs
- *Method*: User evaluation of 50+ analysis results
- *Success Threshold*: >75% rated as "useful" or "very useful"
### Performance Validation
- [ ] **Processing Speed**: Content processing meets time requirements
- *Measure*: Processing time relative to content duration
- *Method*: Benchmark with various content lengths
- *Success Threshold*: <15% of content duration for processing
## Phase 4: Agent Studio Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **Code Editing**: Dana code editor works correctly
- *Measure*: Syntax highlighting, error detection, auto-completion
- *Method*: Test with complex Dana code examples
- *Success Threshold*: All editor features functional
- [ ] **Agent Testing**: Users can test agent modifications
- *Measure*: REPL execution success rate
- *Method*: Test with various agent configurations
- *Success Threshold*: >90% execution success rate
- [ ] **Graph Visualization**: Knowledge graph displays correctly
- *Measure*: Node/edge rendering, interaction, performance
- *Method*: Test with graphs of varying complexity (10-1000 nodes)
- *Success Threshold*: Smooth interaction with <2s load times
### User Validation
- [ ] **Customization Success**: Power users can modify agents effectively
- *Measure*: Percentage of users who successfully customize agents
- *Method*: Testing with 20 technical users
- *Success Threshold*: >60% successful customizations
## Phase 5: Orchestration Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **Query Routing**: Queries are routed to appropriate agents
- *Measure*: Correct agent selection for various query types
- *Method*: Test with 100+ diverse queries
- *Success Threshold*: >85% correct routing
- [ ] **Response Synthesis**: Multi-agent responses are coherent
- *Measure*: User-rated coherence of synthesized responses
- *Method*: User evaluation of 50+ multi-agent responses
- *Success Threshold*: >70% rated as "coherent" or "very coherent"
- [ ] **Performance**: Cross-domain queries meet latency requirements
- *Measure*: Response time for complex queries
- *Method*: Load testing with concurrent queries
- *Success Threshold*: <5s P95 response time
## Overall System Validation
### User Experience Validation
- [ ] **Onboarding Success**: New users can get started independently
- *Measure*: Task completion rate for "first hour experience"
- *Method*: User testing with 20 first-time users
- *Success Threshold*: >70% complete core onboarding tasks
- [ ] **Daily Usage**: System supports regular knowledge work
- *Measure*: Daily active usage, session length, feature usage
- *Method*: Beta testing with 50+ users over 2 weeks
- *Success Threshold*: >30 min daily usage, >50% feature utilization
### Technical Validation
- [ ] **System Reliability**: Uptime and error rates meet requirements
- *Measure*: Service uptime, error rates, incident response time
- *Method*: Production monitoring over 30 days
- *Success Threshold*: >99.5% uptime, <1% error rate
- [ ] **Scalability**: System handles growth in users and data
- *Measure*: Performance under increased load
- *Method*: Scalability testing with simulated growth
- *Success Threshold*: Maintains performance with 10x user growth
### Business Validation
- [ ] **User Satisfaction**: Users find value in the system
- *Measure*: Net Promoter Score, user satisfaction surveys
- *Method*: Post-MVP surveys with 100+ users
- *Success Threshold*: >50 NPS, >4/5 satisfaction rating
- [ ] **Feature Usage**: Core features are used regularly
- *Measure*: Feature adoption rates, usage frequency
- *Method*: Analytics tracking over 60 days
- *Success Threshold*: >70% users use core features weekly
## Validation Timeline
### Weekly Validation (During Development)
- **Unit Test Coverage**: >80% maintained
- **Integration Tests**: Run daily, >95% pass rate
- **Performance Benchmarks**: No regression >10%
- **Security Scans**: Clean results weekly
### Milestone Validation (End of Each Phase)
- **Functional Completeness**: All phase features implemented
- **Quality Standards**: All tests pass, no critical bugs
- **User Testing**: Representative users validate workflows
- **Performance Requirements**: All SLAs met
### MVP Validation (End of Phase 2+)
- **User Acceptance**: Beta users can use system productively
- **Technical Stability**: No critical issues in production-like environment
- **Performance**: Meets all user-facing requirements
- **Documentation**: Complete user and technical documentation
## Validation Tools and Infrastructure
### Automated Validation
- **CI/CD Pipeline**: Runs all tests on every commit
- **Performance Monitoring**: Automated performance regression detection
- **Security Scanning**: Integrated vulnerability scanning
- **Accessibility Testing**: Automated WCAG compliance checking
### Manual Validation
- **User Testing Lab**: Dedicated environment for user research
- **Bug Tracking**: Comprehensive issue tracking and management
- **Analytics Dashboard**: Real-time usage and performance metrics
- **Feedback Collection**: Multiple channels for user input
### Quality Gates
- **Code Review**: Required for all changes
- **Testing**: Must pass before merge
- **Security Review**: For sensitive changes
- **Performance Review**: For performance-impacting changes
## Success Criteria Summary
### Minimum Success Criteria (Must Meet)
- [ ] All critical user journeys work end-to-end
- [ ] System is secure and respects data sovereignty
- [ ] Performance meets user expectations
- [ ] Code quality meets professional standards
### Target Success Criteria (Should Meet)
- [ ] Advanced features work reliably
- [ ] User experience is exceptional
- [ ] System scales to realistic usage levels
- [ ] Documentation is comprehensive and helpful
### Stretch Success Criteria (Nice to Meet)
- [ ] Innovative features delight users
- [ ] System becomes a platform for extensions
- [ ] Community adoption and contributions
- [ ] Industry recognition and awards
This validation framework ensures the Advanced Second Brain PKM system delivers real value to users while maintaining high technical and quality standards throughout development.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/milestones/validation-criteria.md

197
docs/plans/project-phases/phase-1-foundation.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,197 @@
# Phase 1: Foundation and Core Infrastructure
**Timeline**: Weeks 1-4
**Objective**: Establish the technical foundation and core system architecture
**Success Criteria**: Functional backend API with all core services operational
## Overview
Phase 1 establishes the **dual manifold cognitive architecture foundation** - the revolutionary core that differentiates this system from traditional PKM tools. We implement the three-layer memory hierarchy (episodic, semantic, persona) and begin construction of both individual and collective manifolds. This phase creates the mathematical primitives for intelligence that transcends simple information retrieval.
## Critical Dependencies
- **Blocking for Phase 2**: File system integration, API endpoints, basic data services
- **Dana Runtime**: Must be functional for agent development in later phases
- **Database Setup**: Required for knowledge representation throughout the system
## Detailed Implementation Plan
### Week 1: Dual Manifold Mathematical Foundation
#### Day 1-2: Manifold Primitives and Configuration
- [ ] Implement mathematical primitives for manifold operations
- [ ] Set up dual manifold configuration system
- [ ] Create vector space management for individual/collective manifolds
- [ ] Initialize geometric consistency validation
- [ ] Set up development environment with manifold libraries
#### Day 3-4: Episodic Memory Layer - Hybrid Indexing
- [ ] Implement FAISS dense vector indexing for conceptual similarity
- [ ] Build BM25 sparse indexing for exact technical term matching
- [ ] Create reciprocal rank fusion for hybrid search results
- [ ] Develop document chunking with temporal metadata preservation
- [ ] Test hybrid retrieval accuracy and performance
#### Day 5: Semantic Memory Layer - Temporal Distillation
- [ ] Implement LLM-powered concept extraction from chunks
- [ ] Build temporal trajectory analysis for cognitive evolution
- [ ] Create time-series modeling of concept strength and trends
- [ ] Develop focus shift detection algorithms
- [ ] Validate semantic distillation accuracy
### Week 2: Persona Layer and Graph Construction
#### Day 1-3: Knowledge Graph Construction
- [ ] Implement NetworkX-based knowledge graph builder
- [ ] Create weighted edges based on co-occurrence analysis
- [ ] Develop centrality measure calculations (PageRank, betweenness)
- [ ] Build graph persistence and loading mechanisms
- [ ] Test graph construction from temporal concept data
#### Day 4-5: Gravity Well Manifold Representation
- [ ] Implement kernel density estimation for gravity wells
- [ ] Create manifold distance calculations (1 - cosine similarity)
- [ ] Build mass calculation based on graph centrality
- [ ] Develop geometric consistency validation
- [ ] Test manifold representation stability
### Week 3: Collective Manifold Construction
#### Day 1-2: OpenAlex Integration
- [ ] Implement OpenAlex API client for scientific publications
- [ ] Create community knowledge graph construction
- [ ] Build citation network analysis
- [ ] Develop domain-specific publication filtering
- [ ] Test API reliability and rate limiting
#### Day 3-4: Wireframe Manifold Estimation
- [ ] Implement wireframe grid construction for collective manifold
- [ ] Create estimation points for manifold approximation
- [ ] Build interpolation algorithms for smooth surfaces
- [ ] Develop manifold boundary detection
- [ ] Validate wireframe geometric properties
#### Day 5: Cross-Manifold Validation
- [ ] Implement manifold intersection calculations
- [ ] Create consistency checks between individual/collective manifolds
- [ ] Build geometric validation metrics
- [ ] Develop manifold alignment algorithms
- [ ] Test cross-manifold operations
### Week 4: Braiding Engine Implementation
#### Day 1-2: Individual Resonance (Alpha) Scoring
- [ ] Implement alpha calculation using gravity well distance
- [ ] Create graph centrality weighting for concept importance
- [ ] Build temporal relevance scoring
- [ ] Develop confidence interval calculations
- [ ] Test alpha scoring accuracy
#### Day 3-4: Collective Feasibility (Beta) Scoring
- [ ] Implement beta calculation using random walk probabilities
- [ ] Create wireframe support estimation
- [ ] Build citation network validation
- [ ] Develop community consensus metrics
- [ ] Test beta scoring reliability
#### Day 5: Structural Gate and Final Integration
- [ ] Implement structural gate function with hallucination filtering
- [ ] Create braiding parameter optimization
- [ ] Build final S_braid calculation pipeline
- [ ] Develop API endpoints for manifold operations
- [ ] Comprehensive testing of braiding engine
## Deliverables
### Code Deliverables
- [ ] **Episodic Memory Layer**: Hybrid indexing (dense vectors + BM25) with reciprocal rank fusion
- [ ] **Semantic Memory Layer**: Temporal distillation pipeline with cognitive trajectory analysis
- [ ] **Persona Memory Layer**: Knowledge graph construction with centrality measures
- [ ] **Individual Manifold**: Basic gravity well representation and novelty repulsion
- [ ] **Collective Manifold**: OpenAlex integration for community knowledge
- [ ] **Braiding Engine**: Structural gate implementation with alpha/beta scoring
- [ ] Comprehensive test suite (>80% coverage) for manifold operations
### Documentation Deliverables
- [ ] API documentation with examples
- [ ] Architecture diagrams and data flow documentation
- [ ] Database schema documentation
- [ ] Deployment and configuration guides
- [ ] Integration testing procedures
### Infrastructure Deliverables
- [ ] Docker containerization setup
- [ ] Development environment configuration
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline foundation
- [ ] Monitoring and logging setup
- [ ] Database backup and recovery procedures
## Success Metrics
- [ ] **Manifold Construction**: Both individual and collective manifolds initialize correctly
- [ ] **Hybrid Indexing**: Episodic layer achieves >95% retrieval accuracy with <100ms query time
- [ ] **Cognitive Distillation**: Semantic layer processes temporal trajectories with >90% concept extraction accuracy
- [ ] **Graph Construction**: Persona layer builds knowledge graphs with proper centrality measures
- [ ] **Braiding Validation**: Structural gates correctly filter hallucinations (>95% accuracy)
- [ ] **Mathematical Primitives**: All manifold operations maintain geometric consistency
- [ ] **API Endpoints**: Manifold operations respond within 500ms
## Risk Mitigation
### Technical Risks
- **Dana Runtime Maturity**: If Dana integration proves difficult, implement fallback agent system
- **Database Performance**: Monitor query performance and optimize as needed
- **File System Compatibility**: Test on multiple platforms early
### Timeline Risks
- **Complex Integration**: Allocate buffer time for unexpected integration challenges
- **Dependency Issues**: Use pinned versions and test thoroughly
- **Learning Curve**: Schedule architecture reviews and pair programming
## Testing Strategy
### Unit Testing
- [ ] Test all core services in isolation
- [ ] Mock external dependencies (APIs, databases)
- [ ] Test error conditions and edge cases
- [ ] Validate configuration loading
### Integration Testing
- [ ] Test service-to-service communication
- [ ] Validate data flow through entire pipelines
- [ ] Test concurrent operations
- [ ] Verify resource cleanup
### Performance Testing
- [ ] Load test API endpoints
- [ ] Test document processing at scale
- [ ] Validate memory usage patterns
- [ ] Monitor database query performance
## Parallel Development Opportunities
While Phase 1 is primarily backend-focused, the following can be started in parallel:
- **Frontend Architecture**: Set up basic React/Next.js structure
- **UI Design System**: Begin implementing design tokens and components
- **API Contract Definition**: Define detailed API specifications
- **Testing Infrastructure**: Set up testing frameworks and CI/CD
## Phase Gate Criteria
Phase 1 is complete when:
- [ ] **Dual Manifold Architecture**: Both individual and collective manifolds construct and validate correctly
- [ ] **Three-Layer Memory**: Episodic, semantic, and persona layers operate with >90% accuracy
- [ ] **Braiding Engine**: Structural gates filter hallucinations with >95% accuracy
- [ ] **Mathematical Consistency**: All manifold operations maintain geometric properties
- [ ] **API Contracts**: Manifold operations are documented and stable
- [ ] **Demonstration**: Team can show cognitive trajectory analysis and optimal suggestion generation
## Next Steps
After Phase 1 completion:
1. Conduct architecture review with full team
2. Begin Phase 2 UI development with confidence
3. Schedule regular integration points between frontend/backend
4. Plan Phase 3 content processing based on Phase 1 learnings</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/project-phases/phase-1-foundation.md

189
docs/plans/project-phases/phase-2-core-ui.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,189 @@
# Phase 2: Core UI and Knowledge Browser
**Timeline**: Weeks 5-8
**Objective**: Build the primary user interface and core knowledge browsing functionality
**Success Criteria**: Functional Knowledge Browser with basic search, visualization, and content management
## Overview
Phase 2 builds the complete user interface that brings the Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture to life. Based on comprehensive UI design specifications, this phase implements four core views: Dashboard, Domain Knowledge Browser, Agent Studio, and Global Orchestrator Chat. The interface balances data density for power users with intuitive interactions for knowledge exploration, while deeply integrating Dana agent management and multi-manifold visualization.
## Critical Dependencies
- **Requires Phase 1**: All backend APIs must be functional and documented
- **UI Framework**: React/Next.js with TypeScript
- **Design System**: Consistent component library and styling
- **API Integration**: Complete API contract implementation
## Detailed Implementation Plan
### Week 5: UI Foundation and Dashboard
#### Day 1-2: Design System and Dark Mode Theme
- [ ] Implement dark mode theme (#121212, #1E1E1E backgrounds)
- [ ] Set up color coding system (cyan=Dana, purple=orchestration, emerald=insights)
- [ ] Create typography system (Inter/Roboto + Fira Code/JetBrains Mono)
- [ ] Build component library with collapsible panes
- [ ] Set up persistent left sidebar navigation
#### Day 3-4: Dashboard Implementation
- [ ] Create goals module (Kanban/checklist for learning objectives)
- [ ] Build domain grid with large cards (icon, name, doc count, agent status)
- [ ] Implement system status indicators (agent activity, processing status)
- [ ] Add search functionality and domain creation
- [ ] Set up responsive grid layout
#### Day 5: API Integration and State Management
- [ ] Create API client for Dana agent communication
- [ ] Implement React Query for manifold data fetching
- [ ] Set up global state for domain selection and user goals
- [ ] Add loading states and error boundaries
- [ ] Create mock data for development testing
### Week 6: Domain Knowledge Browser
#### Day 1-2: Three-Pane Layout Implementation
- [ ] Create collapsible three-pane layout (drawer/content/insights)
- [ ] Implement left drawer (250px) with file tree navigation
- [ ] Build flexible middle pane for content viewing
- [ ] Create right insights pane (400px) with fabric pattern interface
- [ ] Add pane collapse/expand controls
#### Day 3-4: Content Viewers and Media Support
- [ ] Implement PDF reader with clean viewing experience
- [ ] Build video player with synchronized transcript display
- [ ] Create Markdown/text renderer
- [ ] Add media scraping status indicators
- [ ] Implement content navigation and search
#### Day 5: Fabric Pattern Processing
- [ ] Build fabric pattern selection interface
- [ ] Implement insight extraction (summarize, extract ideas, find actions)
- [ ] Create structured output display
- [ ] Add pattern history and favorites
- [ ] Integrate with backend processing agents
### Week 7: Agent Studio - Dana IDE
#### Day 1-2: IDE Layout and Dana Editor
- [ ] Implement IDE-style three-panel layout
- [ ] Create Dana code editor with syntax highlighting
- [ ] Build tab system for agent.na, tools.na, config.json files
- [ ] Add code folding and navigation features
- [ ] Implement auto-save and version control integration
#### Day 3-4: Context Management and Graph Visualization
- [ ] Create left context panel with file checklists
- [ ] Build knowledge graph visualizer (interactive node map)
- [ ] Implement node clicking to highlight related code/docs
- [ ] Add graph filtering and search capabilities
- [ ] Create context building interface with drag-and-drop
#### Day 5: REPL and Testing Environment
- [ ] Build bottom REPL terminal for Dana code execution
- [ ] Implement command history and auto-completion
- [ ] Add real-time agent testing capabilities
- [ ] Create log display for agent execution and errors
- [ ] Integrate build and deployment buttons
### Week 8: Global Orchestrator and Final Integration
#### Day 1-2: Orchestrator Chat Interface
- [ ] Create central chat interface for multi-agent conversations
- [ ] Implement scope selector with domain checkboxes
- [ ] Build chat history display with agent attribution
- [ ] Add real-time agent status indicators
- [ ] Create query routing visualization
#### Day 3-4: Cross-Domain Integration
- [ ] Implement domain scope filtering for queries
- [ ] Build orchestrator agent communication
- [ ] Add synthesis result display
- [ ] Create agent collaboration visualization
- [ ] Integrate with backend manifold operations
#### Day 5: Final Polish and Testing
- [ ] End-to-end user journey testing across all views
- [ ] Performance optimization for large knowledge graphs
- [ ] Accessibility audit (ARIA labels, keyboard navigation)
- [ ] Cross-platform testing (Linux focus)
- [ ] User experience refinements and animations
## Deliverables
### Core UI Views
- [ ] Dashboard with goals tracking and domain grid
- [ ] Domain Knowledge Browser (three-pane layout)
- [ ] Agent Studio IDE with Dana editor and REPL
- [ ] Global Orchestrator Chat with scope selection
### Dana Integration
- [ ] Dana syntax highlighting and editing
- [ ] Built-in REPL for agent testing
- [ ] Context management with file checklists
- [ ] Knowledge graph visualization
- [ ] Agent building and deployment interface
### User Experience
- [ ] Dark mode theme with color-coded elements
- [ ] Collapsible pane system for data density
- [ ] Floating chat overlays for domain interaction
- [ ] Responsive design for desktop workflows
- [ ] Keyboard shortcuts and accessibility compliance
### Multi-Agent Features
- [ ] Real-time agent status monitoring
- [ ] Cross-domain query orchestration
- [ ] Scope-based data filtering
- [ ] Agent collaboration visualization
- [ ] Background processing indicators
## Success Metrics
- [ ] All four core views (Dashboard, Browser, Studio, Chat) fully functional
- [ ] Dana editor with syntax highlighting and REPL testing operational
- [ ] Three-pane layout renders smoothly with collapsible controls
- [ ] Orchestrator chat handles cross-domain queries with scope selection
- [ ] Knowledge graph visualization interactive for 500+ nodes
- [ ] Page load times < 2 seconds for all views
- [ ] Accessibility compliance > 90% (WCAG 2.1 AA)
- [ ] Dark mode theme consistently applied across all components
## Risk Mitigation
### Technical Risks
- **Performance**: Implement virtualization for large datasets
- **Browser Compatibility**: Test on target browsers early
- **API Latency**: Add caching and optimistic updates
### Timeline Risks
- **UI Complexity**: Break down into smaller components
- **Integration Issues**: Daily integration testing with backend
- **Design Iterations**: Plan for 2-3 design review cycles
## Testing Strategy
### Component Testing
- [ ] Unit tests for all UI components
- [ ] Visual regression testing
- [ ] Accessibility testing
### Integration Testing
- [ ] API integration tests
- [ ] End-to-end user flows
- [ ] Cross-browser compatibility
### User Testing
- [ ] Usability testing sessions
- [ ] Performance testing
- [ ] Accessibility evaluation
## Phase Gate Criteria
Phase 2 is complete when:
- [ ] Knowledge Browser is fully functional
- [ ] All core user workflows work end-to-end
- [ ] Performance meets requirements
- [ ] Code is reviewed and tested
- [ ] Documentation is updated</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/project-phases/phase-2-core-ui.md

155
docs/plans/project-phases/phase-3-advanced-features.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
# Phase 3: Advanced Features and AI Integration
**Timeline**: Weeks 9-16
**Objective**: Implement advanced AI capabilities, content processing, and intelligent features
**Success Criteria**: Functional AI agents, automated content processing, and advanced knowledge features
## Overview
Phase 3 focuses on the intelligent features that make the Second Brain truly powerful. This includes AI agents, automated content processing, and advanced knowledge management capabilities.
## Critical Dependencies
- **Requires Phase 2**: Functional UI and backend integration
- **AI/ML Infrastructure**: Access to embedding models and processing
- **Content Processing**: Robust document handling pipeline
- **Agent Framework**: Working Dana integration
## Detailed Implementation Plan
### Week 9-10: Content Processing Pipeline
#### Advanced Document Processing
- [ ] Implement OCR for images/PDFs (Tesseract)
- [ ] Add audio transcription (Whisper)
- [ ] Create video processing pipeline
- [ ] Implement content classification
- [ ] Add metadata extraction and enrichment
#### Intelligent Chunking
- [ ] Semantic text chunking algorithms
- [ ] Context-aware document splitting
- [ ] Hierarchical content organization
- [ ] Cross-reference detection
- [ ] Content quality assessment
### Week 11-12: AI Agent Development
#### Core Agent Capabilities
- [ ] Research agent for automated information gathering
- [ ] Summarization agent for content condensation
- [ ] Connection agent for relationship discovery
- [ ] Question-answering agent
- [ ] Content generation agent
#### Agent Orchestration
- [ ] Agent communication framework
- [ ] Workflow orchestration system
- [ ] Agent scheduling and prioritization
- [ ] Conflict resolution mechanisms
- [ ] Agent performance monitoring
### Week 13-14: Knowledge Enhancement
#### Automated Linking
- [ ] Semantic similarity detection
- [ ] Cross-document relationship mining
- [ ] Knowledge graph expansion
- [ ] Citation and reference tracking
- [ ] Concept mapping and clustering
#### Content Enrichment
- [ ] Automated tagging and categorization
- [ ] Entity extraction and linking
- [ ] Timeline reconstruction
- [ ] Topic modeling and clustering
- [ ] Content gap identification
### Week 15-16: Advanced Features
#### Intelligent Search
- [ ] Natural language query processing
- [ ] Contextual search with conversation history
- [ ] Multi-modal search (text, image, audio)
- [ ] Search result ranking and relevance
- [ ] Search analytics and insights
#### Personalization
- [ ] User behavior analysis
- [ ] Adaptive interface customization
- [ ] Personalized recommendations
- [ ] Learning user preferences
- [ ] Dynamic content prioritization
## Deliverables
### AI Features
- [ ] Functional AI agents with Dana integration
- [ ] Automated content processing pipeline
- [ ] Intelligent search and discovery
- [ ] Knowledge graph enhancement
- [ ] Personalization engine
### Processing Capabilities
- [ ] Multi-format content ingestion
- [ ] Advanced document analysis
- [ ] Automated metadata generation
- [ ] Content quality assessment
- [ ] Cross-reference detection
### Intelligence Features
- [ ] Semantic search capabilities
- [ ] Automated knowledge linking
- [ ] Content summarization
- [ ] Question answering system
- [ ] Recommendation engine
## Success Metrics
- [ ] Content processing accuracy > 95%
- [ ] AI agent response time < 10 seconds
- [ ] Search relevance score > 85%
- [ ] Knowledge graph growth rate > 50% automated
- [ ] User satisfaction score > 4.5/5
## Risk Mitigation
### Technical Risks
- **AI Model Performance**: Implement fallback mechanisms
- **Processing Scalability**: Design for incremental processing
- **Agent Stability**: Sandboxing and error recovery
- **Data Quality**: Validation and quality gates
### Timeline Risks
- **AI Integration Complexity**: Start with simple agents first
- **Content Processing Volume**: Implement queuing and batching
- **User Experience Impact**: Feature flags for gradual rollout
## Testing Strategy
### AI Testing
- [ ] Agent behavior validation
- [ ] Content processing accuracy tests
- [ ] Search result quality assessment
- [ ] Performance benchmarking
### Integration Testing
- [ ] End-to-end AI workflows
- [ ] Multi-agent coordination
- [ ] Content pipeline reliability
- [ ] Error handling and recovery
### User Acceptance Testing
- [ ] AI feature usability testing
- [ ] Content processing validation
- [ ] Performance and reliability assessment
## Phase Gate Criteria
Phase 3 is complete when:
- [ ] All AI agents are functional and tested
- [ ] Content processing pipeline handles all target formats
- [ ] Advanced search features work reliably
- [ ] Knowledge enhancement is automated
- [ ] Performance meets requirements</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/project-phases/phase-3-advanced-features.md

154
docs/plans/project-phases/phase-4-integration-optimization.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
# Phase 4: Integration and Optimization
**Timeline**: Weeks 17-20
**Objective**: Optimize performance, add integrations, and prepare for production
**Success Criteria**: Production-ready system with integrations and optimized performance
## Overview
Phase 4 focuses on system integration, performance optimization, and production readiness. This phase ensures the system can handle real-world usage and integrates with external tools and services.
## Critical Dependencies
- **Requires Phase 3**: All core features functional
- **Performance Baseline**: Established metrics from previous phases
- **Integration APIs**: Access to target external services
- **Production Environment**: Infrastructure for deployment
## Detailed Implementation Plan
### Week 17: Performance Optimization
#### Backend Optimization
- [ ] Database query optimization and indexing
- [ ] API response time optimization
- [ ] Memory usage optimization
- [ ] Caching strategy implementation
- [ ] Background job processing optimization
#### Frontend Optimization
- [ ] Bundle size optimization
- [ ] Image and asset optimization
- [ ] Rendering performance improvements
- [ ] Network request optimization
- [ ] Progressive loading implementation
### Week 18: External Integrations
#### API Integrations
- [ ] Notion integration for content sync
- [ ] Obsidian integration for markdown sync
- [ ] GitHub integration for code repositories
- [ ] Calendar integration for timeline features
- [ ] Email integration for content ingestion
#### Service Integrations
- [ ] Cloud storage providers (Dropbox, Google Drive)
- [ ] Productivity tools (Todoist, Trello)
- [ ] Communication platforms (Slack, Discord)
- [ ] Browser extensions for web content
- [ ] Mobile app companion
### Week 19: Advanced Features
#### Collaboration Features
- [ ] Multi-user knowledge sharing
- [ ] Real-time collaboration
- [ ] Version control for knowledge graphs
- [ ] Comment and annotation system
- [ ] Access control and permissions
#### Analytics and Insights
- [ ] Usage analytics and reporting
- [ ] Knowledge growth metrics
- [ ] Content quality analytics
- [ ] Performance monitoring dashboard
- [ ] User behavior insights
### Week 20: Production Readiness
#### Security and Compliance
- [ ] Security audit and penetration testing
- [ ] Data encryption implementation
- [ ] Privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA)
- [ ] Access logging and monitoring
- [ ] Backup and disaster recovery
#### Deployment and Operations
- [ ] Production deployment pipeline
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting setup
- [ ] Automated backup systems
- [ ] Performance monitoring
- [ ] Incident response procedures
## Deliverables
### Performance Improvements
- [ ] 50% improvement in response times
- [ ] 60% reduction in bundle size
- [ ] Support for 10x current user load
- [ ] <100ms API response times
- [ ] <2 second page load times
### Integrations
- [ ] 5+ external service integrations
- [ ] API documentation for integrations
- [ ] Integration testing suite
- [ ] User onboarding for integrations
### Production Features
- [ ] Multi-user collaboration
- [ ] Advanced analytics dashboard
- [ ] Security and compliance features
- [ ] Production deployment scripts
## Success Metrics
- [ ] Performance benchmarks met or exceeded
- [ ] All integration APIs functional
- [ ] Security audit passed
- [ ] Production deployment successful
- [ ] User load testing passed
## Risk Mitigation
### Technical Risks
- **Integration Complexity**: Start with core integrations first
- **Performance Regression**: Continuous performance monitoring
- **Security Vulnerabilities**: Regular security reviews
- **Scalability Issues**: Load testing throughout development
### Timeline Risks
- **Integration Dependencies**: Parallel development with vendors
- **Testing Complexity**: Automated testing for all integrations
- **Deployment Challenges**: Staging environment for testing
## Testing Strategy
### Performance Testing
- [ ] Load testing with realistic user scenarios
- [ ] Stress testing for peak loads
- [ ] Memory and resource usage testing
- [ ] Network condition simulation
### Integration Testing
- [ ] API contract testing for all integrations
- [ ] End-to-end integration workflows
- [ ] Error handling and recovery testing
- [ ] Compatibility testing across platforms
### Security Testing
- [ ] Penetration testing
- [ ] Vulnerability scanning
- [ ] Access control testing
- [ ] Data privacy compliance testing
## Phase Gate Criteria
Phase 4 is complete when:
- [ ] Performance optimizations implemented
- [ ] Key integrations functional
- [ ] Security requirements met
- [ ] Production deployment ready
- [ ] All testing passed</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/project-phases/phase-4-integration-optimization.md

166
docs/plans/project-phases/phase-5-production-launch.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
# Phase 5: Production Launch and Scaling
**Timeline**: Weeks 21-24
**Objective**: Launch production system, gather feedback, and scale operations
**Success Criteria**: Live production system with initial user adoption and operational stability
## Overview
Phase 5 focuses on production deployment, user acquisition, and operational scaling. This phase transitions from development to live operations with real users.
## Critical Dependencies
- **Requires Phase 4**: Production-ready system
- **Infrastructure**: Scalable hosting and monitoring
- **User Acquisition**: Marketing and onboarding strategy
- **Support Systems**: Customer support and feedback collection
## Detailed Implementation Plan
### Week 21: Production Deployment
#### Infrastructure Setup
- [ ] Production environment provisioning
- [ ] Database setup and migration
- [ ] CDN and static asset deployment
- [ ] SSL certificate configuration
- [ ] Domain and DNS setup
#### Deployment Automation
- [ ] CI/CD pipeline for production
- [ ] Automated deployment scripts
- [ ] Rollback procedures
- [ ] Blue-green deployment strategy
- [ ] Zero-downtime deployment testing
### Week 22: User Onboarding and Support
#### Onboarding Experience
- [ ] User registration and setup flow
- [ ] Interactive tutorials and walkthroughs
- [ ] Sample data and templates
- [ ] Getting started documentation
- [ ] Video tutorials and guides
#### Support Infrastructure
- [ ] Help center and documentation
- [ ] Community forum setup
- [ ] Support ticket system
- [ ] Live chat integration
- [ ] Knowledge base creation
### Week 23: Monitoring and Optimization
#### Operational Monitoring
- [ ] Application performance monitoring (APM)
- [ ] Error tracking and alerting
- [ ] User analytics and usage tracking
- [ ] Infrastructure monitoring
- [ ] Business metrics dashboard
#### Continuous Improvement
- [ ] User feedback collection and analysis
- [ ] A/B testing framework
- [ ] Feature usage analytics
- [ ] Performance optimization based on real usage
- [ ] Bug tracking and prioritization
### Week 24: Scaling and Growth
#### User Acquisition
- [ ] Marketing campaign launch
- [ ] Social media presence
- [ ] Content marketing and SEO
- [ ] Partnership and affiliate programs
- [ ] User referral program
#### Operational Scaling
- [ ] Auto-scaling configuration
- [ ] Database optimization for growth
- [ ] Caching strategy refinement
- [ ] CDN optimization
- [ ] Cost optimization and monitoring
## Deliverables
### Production System
- [ ] Live production deployment
- [ ] Automated deployment pipeline
- [ ] Monitoring and alerting systems
- [ ] Backup and disaster recovery
- [ ] Security monitoring
### User Experience
- [ ] Complete onboarding flow
- [ ] Comprehensive documentation
- [ ] Support and community systems
- [ ] User feedback mechanisms
### Growth Infrastructure
- [ ] User acquisition channels
- [ ] Analytics and tracking systems
- [ ] A/B testing capabilities
- [ ] Performance optimization tools
## Success Metrics
- [ ] Successful production launch with zero critical issues
- [ ] 100+ active users within first month
- [ ] >99.5% uptime during launch period
- [ ] User satisfaction score >4.2/5
- [ ] Support ticket resolution <24 hours
## Risk Mitigation
### Operational Risks
- **Launch Issues**: Comprehensive pre-launch testing
- **Performance Problems**: Gradual user rollout
- **Security Incidents**: Incident response plan
- **User Adoption**: Beta testing program
### Business Risks
- **Market Reception**: User feedback integration
- **Competition**: Unique value proposition focus
- **Funding/Resources**: Phased scaling approach
- **Technical Debt**: Regular refactoring cycles
## Testing Strategy
### Pre-Launch Testing
- [ ] Production environment testing
- [ ] Load testing with production data
- [ ] End-to-end user journey testing
- [ ] Security and penetration testing
- [ ] Performance benchmarking
### Post-Launch Monitoring
- [ ] Real user monitoring (RUM)
- [ ] Error tracking and alerting
- [ ] Performance monitoring
- [ ] User behavior analytics
- [ ] Business metrics tracking
### User Acceptance Testing
- [ ] Beta user feedback collection
- [ ] Usability testing with real users
- [ ] Performance validation in production
- [ ] Cross-device and browser testing
## Phase Gate Criteria
Phase 5 is complete when:
- [ ] Production system stable for 30 days
- [ ] Initial user acquisition goals met
- [ ] Support systems operational
- [ ] Monitoring and analytics functional
- [ ] Growth strategy implemented
## Long-term Vision
Beyond Phase 5:
- **Phase 6**: Enterprise features and team collaboration
- **Phase 7**: Advanced AI and machine learning integration
- **Phase 8**: Mobile applications and cross-platform expansion
- **Phase 9**: API ecosystem and third-party integrations
- **Phase 10**: Global scaling and multi-region deployment</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/project-phases/phase-5-production-launch.md

277
docs/plans/risk-mitigation/technical-risks.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
# Risk Mitigation and Contingency Planning
This document identifies potential risks to the Advanced Second Brain PKM project and provides mitigation strategies and contingency plans.
## Risk Assessment Framework
### Risk Levels
- **CRITICAL**: Could cause project failure or major delays (>2 weeks)
- **HIGH**: Significant impact on timeline or quality (1-2 weeks delay)
- **MEDIUM**: Moderate impact, manageable with adjustments
- **LOW**: Minor impact, easily mitigated
### Risk Categories
- **Technical**: Technology integration, performance, scalability
- **Project**: Timeline, resources, dependencies
- **Product**: User adoption, feature complexity, market fit
- **External**: Third-party services, regulations, competition
## Critical Risks
### CRITICAL: Dana Language Integration Challenges
**Description**: Dana runtime integration proves more complex than anticipated, requiring significant custom development or architectural changes.
**Impact**: Could delay Phase 1 completion by 2-4 weeks, blocking all agent-related functionality.
**Likelihood**: Medium (Dana is a new language with limited ecosystem)
**Detection**: Phase 1, Week 2-3 prototyping phase
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **Early Prototyping**: Begin Dana integration in Week 1, not Week 3
2. **Fallback Options**: Develop simplified agent framework if Dana proves unsuitable
3. **Community Engagement**: Connect with Dana maintainers early
4. **Modular Design**: Ensure agent system can work with alternative scripting engines
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Switch to Lua/Python scripting with sandboxing
- **Plan B**: Implement rule-based agent system without custom language
- **Plan C**: Delay agent features to post-MVP, deliver knowledge browser first
**Trigger Conditions**: >3 days of blocked progress on Dana integration
### CRITICAL: File System Monitoring Reliability
**Description**: Cross-platform file watching fails on certain operating systems or has unacceptable performance/latency.
**Impact**: Core functionality broken, users cannot add new content reliably.
**Likelihood**: Medium (file system APIs vary significantly across platforms)
**Detection**: Phase 1, Week 2 testing across target platforms
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **Multi-Platform Testing**: Test on Windows, macOS, Linux from Week 1
2. **Fallback Mechanisms**: Implement polling-based fallback for unreliable platforms
3. **Performance Benchmarking**: Establish acceptable latency thresholds (<5 seconds)
4. **User Communication**: Clear documentation of supported platforms
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Implement hybrid polling/watching approach
- **Plan B**: Require manual "sync" button for affected platforms
- **Plan C**: Limit initial release to well-supported platforms (macOS/Linux)
**Trigger Conditions**: >50% failure rate on any target platform
## High Risks
### HIGH: Database Performance at Scale
**Description**: Knowledge graph queries become slow with realistic data volumes (1000+ documents, complex relationships).
**Impact**: UI becomes unresponsive, search takes >5 seconds, poor user experience.
**Likelihood**: High (graph databases can have complex performance characteristics)
**Detection**: Phase 1, Week 4 load testing with sample data
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **Query Optimization**: Design with performance in mind from start
2. **Indexing Strategy**: Implement appropriate database indexes
3. **Caching Layer**: Add Redis caching for frequent queries
4. **Pagination**: Implement result pagination and limits
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Switch to simpler database (PostgreSQL with extensions)
- **Plan B**: Implement search-only MVP, defer complex graph features
- **Plan C**: Add "fast mode" with reduced functionality
**Trigger Conditions**: Query response time >2 seconds with 100 documents
### HIGH: Third-Party API Dependencies
**Description**: OpenAI API, transcription services, or embedding providers experience outages or pricing changes.
**Impact**: Core AI features become unavailable or cost-prohibitive.
**Likelihood**: Medium (external APIs can be unreliable)
**Detection**: Phase 1 integration testing, ongoing monitoring
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **Multiple Providers**: Support multiple transcription/embedding services
2. **Local Fallbacks**: Implement local models where possible
3. **Caching Strategy**: Cache results to reduce API calls
4. **Cost Monitoring**: Implement usage tracking and alerts
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Switch to alternative providers (Google, Anthropic, etc.)
- **Plan B**: Implement offline/local processing mode
- **Plan C**: Make AI features optional, deliver core PKM functionality
**Trigger Conditions**: >24 hour outage or 2x price increase
### HIGH: Scope Creep from Advanced Features
**Description**: Adding sophisticated features (multi-agent orchestration, complex Dana logic) expands scope beyond initial timeline.
**Impact**: Project timeline extends beyond 20 weeks, resources exhausted.
**Likelihood**: High (ambitious feature set)
**Detection**: Weekly scope reviews, milestone assessments
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **MVP Focus**: Strictly prioritize Phase 2 completion before advanced features
2. **Feature Gating**: Implement feature flags for experimental functionality
3. **User Validation**: Test features with real users before full implementation
4. **Iterative Delivery**: Release working versions, gather feedback
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Deliver Phase 2 MVP, defer Phases 4-5 to future versions
- **Plan B**: Simplify orchestration to basic agent routing
- **Plan C**: Focus on single-domain excellence before cross-domain features
**Trigger Conditions**: Phase 2 completion delayed beyond Week 10
## Medium Risks
### MEDIUM: UI/UX Complexity
**Description**: Three-pane layout and complex interactions prove difficult to implement or use.
**Impact**: Poor user experience, low adoption rates.
**Likelihood**: Medium (complex interface design)
**Detection**: Phase 2, Week 1-2 prototyping
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **User Testing**: Regular UX testing throughout Phase 2
2. **Progressive Enhancement**: Ensure basic functionality works first
3. **Responsive Design**: Test across different screen sizes early
4. **Accessibility**: Implement WCAG guidelines from start
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Simplify to two-pane layout
- **Plan B**: Implement tabbed interface instead of panes
- **Plan C**: Focus on mobile-first responsive design
**Trigger Conditions**: User testing shows <70% task completion rates
### MEDIUM: Team Resource Constraints
**Description**: Key team members unavailable or additional expertise needed for complex integrations.
**Impact**: Development slows, quality suffers.
**Likelihood**: Medium (small team, specialized skills needed)
**Detection**: Weekly capacity assessments
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **Skill Assessment**: Identify gaps early, plan for training
2. **Pair Programming**: Cross-train team members
3. **External Resources**: Budget for contractors if needed
4. **Realistic Planning**: Build buffer time into schedule
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Hire contractors for specialized work
- **Plan B**: Simplify technical implementation
- **Plan C**: Extend timeline rather than reduce scope
**Trigger Conditions**: >20% reduction in team capacity for >1 week
### MEDIUM: Data Privacy and Security Concerns
**Description**: Users concerned about local data handling, or security vulnerabilities discovered.
**Impact**: Low adoption, legal/compliance issues.
**Likelihood**: Low-Medium (local-first design mitigates most concerns)
**Detection**: Ongoing security reviews, user feedback
**Mitigation Strategies**:
1. **Transparent Communication**: Clearly document data handling practices
2. **Security Audits**: Regular code security reviews
3. **Privacy by Design**: Build privacy controls into architecture
4. **Compliance**: Ensure GDPR/CCPA compliance where applicable
**Contingency Plans**:
- **Plan A**: Implement additional privacy controls and transparency features
- **Plan B**: Add enterprise features (encryption, access controls)
- **Plan C**: Focus on transparency and user education
**Trigger Conditions**: >10% of users express privacy concerns
## Low Risks
### LOW: Performance Issues
**Description**: System performance doesn't meet requirements on lower-end hardware.
**Impact**: Limited user base to high-end machines.
**Likelihood**: Low (modern web technologies are performant)
**Detection**: Phase 2 performance testing
**Mitigation**: Optimize bundle size, implement virtualization, add performance monitoring
### LOW: Browser Compatibility
**Description**: Features don't work on certain browsers.
**Impact**: Limited user base.
**Likelihood**: Low (targeting modern browsers)
**Detection**: Cross-browser testing in Phase 2
**Mitigation**: Progressive enhancement, polyfills, clear browser requirements
## Risk Monitoring and Response
### Weekly Risk Assessment
- **Monday Meetings**: Review risk status, update mitigation plans
- **Progress Tracking**: Monitor against early warning indicators
- **Contingency Planning**: Keep plans current and actionable
### Early Warning Indicators
- **Technical**: Integration tasks taking >2x estimated time
- **Project**: Milestone slippage >20%
- **Product**: User feedback indicates feature confusion
- **External**: Service outages or API changes
### Escalation Procedures
1. **Team Level**: Discuss in daily standups, adjust sprint plans
2. **Project Level**: Escalate to project lead, consider contingency plans
3. **Organization Level**: Involve stakeholders, consider project pivot
## Contingency Implementation Framework
### Decision Criteria
- **Impact Assessment**: Quantify cost of mitigation vs. impact of risk
- **Resource Availability**: Consider team capacity and budget
- **User Impact**: Prioritize changes that affect user experience
- **Technical Feasibility**: Ensure technical solutions are viable
### Implementation Steps
1. **Risk Confirmation**: Gather data to confirm risk materialization
2. **Option Evaluation**: Assess all contingency plan options
3. **Stakeholder Communication**: Explain changes and rationale
4. **Implementation Planning**: Create detailed rollout plan
5. **Execution**: Implement changes with monitoring
6. **Follow-up**: Assess impact and adjust as needed
## Success Metrics for Risk Management
- **Risk Prediction Accuracy**: >80% of critical risks identified pre-project
- **Response Time**: <24 hours for critical risk mitigation
- **Contingency Effectiveness**: >70% of implemented contingencies successful
- **Project Stability**: <10% timeline variance due to unforeseen risks
This risk mitigation plan provides a comprehensive framework for identifying, monitoring, and responding to potential project threats while maintaining development momentum and product quality.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/risk-mitigation/technical-risks.md

334
docs/plans/technical-implementation/backend-architecture.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
# Backend Architecture Implementation Plan
This document provides detailed technical specifications for implementing the backend architecture of the Advanced Second Brain PKM System.
## Architecture Overview
The backend follows a modular, service-oriented architecture designed for scalability, maintainability, and clear separation of concerns.
```
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ API Layer (FastAPI) │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Service Layer │ │
│ │ ┌─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬──────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ File System │ Dana │ Knowledge │ Embedding│ │ │
│ │ │ Service │ Runtime │ Graph │ Service │ │ │
│ │ └─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┘ │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
│ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Data Access Layer │ │
│ │ ┌─────────────┬─────────────┬─────────────┬──────────┐ │ │
│ │ │ Neo4j │ Vector │ File │ Cache │ │ │
│ │ │ Graph DB │ Store │ System │ Layer │ │ │
│ │ └─────────────┴─────────────┴─────────────┴──────────┘ │ │
│ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
## Core Components
### 1. API Layer (FastAPI)
#### Implementation Details
- **Framework**: FastAPI with Pydantic models
- **Version**: API v1 with semantic versioning
- **Documentation**: Auto-generated OpenAPI/Swagger docs
- **Authentication**: API key-based (future: JWT)
- **CORS**: Configured for frontend origins
- **Rate Limiting**: Basic implementation with Redis (future)
#### Key Endpoints
```
# File System Endpoints
GET /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/files # List domain files
GET /api/v1/files/{file_id} # Get file metadata
GET /api/v1/files/{file_id}/content # Get file content
POST /api/v1/files/{file_id}/process # Trigger processing
# Agent Endpoints
GET /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/agent # Get agent config
PUT /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/agent # Update agent config
POST /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/agent/execute # Execute agent
POST /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/agent/test # Test agent code
# Knowledge Graph Endpoints
GET /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/graph # Get graph data
POST /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/graph/query # Query graph
PUT /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/graph/nodes # Update nodes
PUT /api/v1/domains/{domain_id}/graph/edges # Update edges
# Search Endpoints
POST /api/v1/search/semantic # Semantic search
POST /api/v1/search/hybrid # Hybrid search
GET /api/v1/search/suggestions # Search suggestions
# Orchestrator Endpoints
POST /api/v1/orchestrator/query # Cross-domain query
GET /api/v1/orchestrator/status # Orchestrator status
POST /api/v1/orchestrator/agents # Get available agents
```
#### Error Handling
- Standardized error responses with error codes
- Detailed error logging with correlation IDs
- Graceful degradation for service failures
- Client-friendly error messages
### 2. Service Layer
#### File System Service
**Responsibilities:**
- Monitor domain directories for changes
- Handle file I/O operations securely
- Manage file metadata and indexing
- Coordinate document processing
**Key Classes:**
```python
class FileSystemService:
def __init__(self, config: FileSystemConfig)
def watch_directory(self, path: str) -> AsyncGenerator[FileEvent, None]
def get_file_metadata(self, file_path: str) -> FileMetadata
def read_file_content(self, file_path: str, offset: int = 0, limit: int = -1) -> bytes
def process_file(self, file_path: str) -> ProcessingResult
```
**Configuration:**
```python
@dataclass
class FileSystemConfig:
watch_paths: List[str]
excluded_patterns: List[str]
max_file_size: int = 100 * 1024 * 1024 # 100MB
processing_timeout: int = 300 # 5 minutes
concurrent_workers: int = 4
```
#### Dana Runtime Service
**Responsibilities:**
- Execute Dana code in sandboxed environment
- Manage agent lifecycle
- Handle Dana REPL interactions
- Provide debugging and error reporting
**Key Classes:**
```python
class DanaRuntimeService:
def __init__(self, config: DanaConfig)
def execute_code(self, code: str, context: Dict[str, Any]) -> ExecutionResult
def start_repl_session(self, agent_id: str) -> ReplSession
def validate_code(self, code: str) -> ValidationResult
def get_agent_status(self, agent_id: str) -> AgentStatus
```
**Sandboxing Strategy:**
- Restricted execution environment
- Limited standard library access
- Resource usage monitoring
- Timeout enforcement
- Error isolation
#### Knowledge Graph Service
**Responsibilities:**
- Manage graph database operations
- Handle node/edge CRUD operations
- Execute graph queries and traversals
- Provide graph analytics and visualization data
**Key Classes:**
```python
class KnowledgeGraphService:
def __init__(self, config: GraphConfig)
def create_node(self, node_data: NodeData) -> NodeId
def create_edge(self, edge_data: EdgeData) -> EdgeId
def query_graph(self, query: GraphQuery) -> QueryResult
def get_subgraph(self, center_node: NodeId, depth: int) -> GraphData
def calculate_centrality(self, method: str) -> CentralityResult
```
**Graph Schema:**
```cypher
// Node Types
(domain:Domain {id: string, name: string, path: string})
(document:Document {id: string, title: string, type: string})
(chunk:TextChunk {id: string, content: string, embeddings: list})
(concept:Concept {id: string, name: string, strength: float})
(agent:Agent {id: string, domain_id: string, dana_code: string})
// Edge Types
(:domain)-[:CONTAINS]->(:document)
(:document)-[:HAS_CHUNK]->(:chunk)
(:chunk)-[:CONTAINS_CONCEPT]->(:concept)
(:domain)-[:HAS_AGENT]->(:agent)
(:concept)-[:RELATED_TO {weight: float}]->(:concept)
```
#### Embedding Service
**Responsibilities:**
- Generate text embeddings for semantic search
- Manage vector storage and indexing
- Perform similarity searches
- Handle batch processing and caching
**Key Classes:**
```python
class EmbeddingService:
def __init__(self, config: EmbeddingConfig)
def generate_embeddings(self, texts: List[str]) -> List[List[float]]
def search_similar(self, query_embedding: List[float], top_k: int) -> SearchResults
def batch_process_chunks(self, chunks: List[DocumentChunk]) -> ProcessingStats
def update_index(self, new_embeddings: List[Tuple[str, List[float]]]) -> None
```
**Embedding Pipeline:**
1. Text preprocessing and chunking
2. Batch embedding generation
3. Vector normalization
4. Index updates with FAISS
5. Metadata storage in graph database
### 3. Data Access Layer
#### Database Abstraction
- Repository pattern for data access
- Connection pooling and retry logic
- Migration management
- Backup and recovery procedures
#### Caching Strategy
- Redis for session and API caching
- In-memory LRU cache for frequent queries
- CDN integration for static assets (future)
## Implementation Phases
### Phase 1A: Core Infrastructure (Week 1)
1. Set up FastAPI application structure
2. Implement basic configuration management
3. Create database connection layer
4. Set up logging and monitoring
5. Implement health check endpoints
### Phase 1B: File System Integration (Week 2)
1. Implement file system watcher
2. Create file metadata extraction
3. Set up document processing pipeline
4. Implement secure file I/O operations
5. Add file change event handling
### Phase 1C: Dana Runtime (Week 3)
1. Integrate Dana language runtime
2. Implement sandboxed execution
3. Create agent lifecycle management
4. Set up REPL functionality
5. Add error handling and debugging
### Phase 1D: Knowledge Graph (Week 4)
1. Set up Neo4j connection and schema
2. Implement basic CRUD operations
3. Create graph query interface
4. Add centrality calculations
5. Implement graph visualization data endpoints
## Performance Considerations
### Scalability
- Horizontal scaling with load balancer
- Database read replicas for queries
- CDN for static content delivery
- Background job queues for heavy processing
### Optimization Strategies
- Connection pooling for databases
- Embedding batching and caching
- Graph query optimization
- File system operation parallelization
### Monitoring and Observability
- Structured logging with correlation IDs
- Performance metrics collection
- Health checks for all services
- Error tracking and alerting
## Security Implementation
### Data Protection
- Local data sovereignty enforcement
- File system permission validation
- Secure temporary file handling
- Input sanitization and validation
### API Security
- Rate limiting implementation
- Request validation with Pydantic
- CORS configuration
- API key authentication
### Runtime Security
- Dana code sandboxing
- Resource usage limits
- Execution timeouts
- Error isolation
## Testing Strategy
### Unit Testing
- Service layer testing with mocks
- Data access layer testing
- API endpoint testing
- Error condition testing
### Integration Testing
- End-to-end API workflows
- Database integration tests
- File system operation tests
- Cross-service communication tests
### Performance Testing
- Load testing for API endpoints
- Database query performance tests
- File processing throughput tests
- Memory usage profiling
## Deployment Architecture
### Development Environment
- Local Docker Compose setup
- Hot reload for development
- Debug logging enabled
- Local database instances
### Production Environment
- Containerized deployment
- Orchestration with Kubernetes
- Production database configuration
- Monitoring and alerting setup
### CI/CD Pipeline
- Automated testing on commits
- Docker image building
- Security scanning
- Deployment automation
## Migration and Rollback
### Data Migration
- Versioned database migrations
- Backward compatibility for APIs
- Data export/import capabilities
- Rollback procedures for deployments
### Service Updates
- Blue-green deployment strategy
- Feature flags for gradual rollouts
- Monitoring during deployments
- Automated rollback triggers
This architecture provides a solid foundation for the Advanced Second Brain PKM System, ensuring scalability, maintainability, and security while supporting the complex requirements of multi-agent knowledge management.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/technical-implementation/backend-architecture.md

198
docs/plans/technical-implementation/dual-manifold-core-specification.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,198 @@
# Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture - Core Technical Specification
## Executive Summary
The Advanced Second Brain PKM System implements a **dual manifold cognitive architecture** that transcends traditional knowledge management by modeling intelligence as the geometric intersection of two distinct topological vector spaces: individual cognitive trajectories and collective domain knowledge.
## Core Innovation: Beyond Single Manifold Hypothesis
### Traditional Approach (Flawed)
```
Single Manifold: Knowledge → Flat Vector Space → Next Token Prediction
```
- **Problem**: Collapses all knowledge into single high-dimensional probability distribution
- **Limitation**: Cannot distinguish individual cognitive styles from collective norms
- **Failure**: Produces generic responses lacking personal context
### Dual Manifold Approach (Revolutionary)
```
Individual Manifold ⊕ Collective Manifold → Braided Intelligence → Cognitive Synthesis
```
- **Individual Manifold**: Personal knowledge trajectory with temporal evolution
- **Collective Manifold**: Domain expertise with social validation
- **Braiding Process**: Mathematical fusion filtering hallucinations and noise
## Technical Architecture
### 1. Memory Architecture: Three-Layer Hierarchy
#### Episodic Layer (Foundation)
```
Raw Content → Semantic Chunks → Hybrid Index (Dense + Sparse)
```
- **Purpose**: Preserve temporal and contextual integrity of knowledge
- **Technology**: Dual index structure (FAISS + BM25) with reciprocal rank fusion
- **Innovation**: Exact lexical matching for technical terms prevents hallucinations
#### Semantic Layer (Evolution)
```
Temporal Distillation → Cognitive Trajectory → Concept Dynamics
```
- **Purpose**: Model how knowledge evolves over time within individual mind
- **Technology**: LLM-powered distillation with time-series analysis
- **Innovation**: Captures cognitive inertia and reasoning pattern shifts
#### Persona Layer (Synthesis)
```
Knowledge Graph → Centrality Measures → Gravity Well Manifold
```
- **Purpose**: Transform temporal flow into topological structure
- **Technology**: Weighted graph with kernel density estimation
- **Innovation**: Creates "comfort zones" and enables novelty repulsion
### 2. Dual Manifold Construction
#### Individual Manifold (Personal Cognitive Space)
```python
class IndividualManifold:
def __init__(self):
self.episodic_memory = EpisodicLayer()
self.semantic_memory = SemanticLayer()
self.persona_memory = PersonaLayer()
self.gravity_well = GravityWell()
self.novelty_repulsor = NoveltyRepulsor()
```
#### Collective Manifold (Domain Knowledge Space)
```python
class CollectiveManifold:
def __init__(self):
self.openalex_client = OpenAlexClient()
self.community_graph = CommunityGraph()
self.wireframe_builder = WireframeBuilder()
self.validation_engine = ValidationEngine()
```
### 3. Braiding Engine: Mathematical Intelligence Fusion
#### Core Algorithm
```
S_braid = α × Individual_Resonance + β × Collective_Feasibility + γ × Interaction_Term
```
Where:
- **α (Individual Resonance)**: How well idea aligns with personal knowledge trajectory
- **β (Collective Feasibility)**: How strongly supported by domain community
- **γ (Interaction Term)**: Novel combinations at manifold intersection
#### Structural Gate Function
```python
def structural_gate(alpha: float, beta: float) -> float:
"""Filter hallucinations and irrelevant noise"""
# Reject hallucinations (high α, low β)
if alpha > novelty_threshold and beta < hallucination_threshold:
return -alpha * penalty_factor
# Reject noise (low α, high β)
if alpha < noise_threshold and beta > novelty_threshold:
return -beta * penalty_factor
# Valid fusion
return alpha_weight * alpha + beta_weight * beta + gamma * (alpha * beta)
```
### 4. Optimization Objective: Finding P*
```
P* = argmax S_braid(α, β) where P* ∈ Goldilocks Zone
```
**Goldilocks Zone**: Region where ideas are:
- Close enough to existing knowledge (learnable)
- Far enough to be novel (worthwhile)
- Supported by community validation (valid)
## Implementation Roadmap
### Phase 1: Manifold Foundation (Weeks 1-4)
- [ ] Implement episodic memory with hybrid indexing
- [ ] Build semantic distillation pipeline
- [ ] Create basic persona graph construction
- [ ] Establish manifold mathematical primitives
### Phase 2: Dual Manifold Integration (Weeks 5-8)
- [ ] Implement collective manifold with OpenAlex integration
- [ ] Build braiding engine with structural gates
- [ ] Create gravity well representations
- [ ] Develop novelty repulsion algorithms
### Phase 3: Cognitive Synthesis (Weeks 9-16)
- [ ] Implement full cognitive trajectory modeling
- [ ] Build multi-agent coordination for manifold operations
- [ ] Create real-time manifold updates
- [ ] Optimize braiding parameters through validation
### Phase 4: Intelligence Scaling (Weeks 17-20)
- [ ] Scale to multiple knowledge domains
- [ ] Implement parallel manifold processing
- [ ] Add manifold interpolation for cross-domain insights
- [ ] Performance optimization for real-time braiding
### Phase 5: Production Cognitive System (Weeks 21-24)
- [ ] Deploy dual manifold architecture
- [ ] Implement continuous learning and adaptation
- [ ] Add cognitive debugging and introspection
- [ ] Scale to multiple users with isolated manifolds
## Key Technical Differentiators
### 1. Non-Parametric Intelligence
- **Traditional**: Intelligence in model weights (parametric)
- **Dual Manifold**: Intelligence in external graph structures (non-parametric)
- **Advantage**: Adaptable without retraining, interpretable reasoning
### 2. Temporal Cognitive Modeling
- **Traditional**: Stateless knowledge retrieval
- **Dual Manifold**: Time-aware cognitive trajectory analysis
- **Advantage**: Understands learning evolution and predicts knowledge gaps
### 3. Geometric Knowledge Fusion
- **Traditional**: Vector similarity search
- **Dual Manifold**: Manifold intersection with structural constraints
- **Advantage**: Filters noise and hallucinations through geometric validation
### 4. Cognitive Digital Twin
- **Traditional**: Static knowledge bases
- **Dual Manifold**: Dynamic cognitive models that evolve with learning
- **Advantage**: Personal intellectual companion that grows with you
## Success Metrics
### Technical Validation
- **Braiding Accuracy**: >90% valid suggestions (non-hallucinations)
- **Learning Optimization**: 50% reduction in time to expertise
- **Manifold Stability**: <5% geometric distortion under updates
- **Real-time Performance**: <500ms for suggestion generation
### User Experience
- **Personalization**: 80% of suggestions align with user goals
- **Learnability**: Users can acquire new domains 40% faster
- **Retention**: 65% improvement in knowledge retention
- **Satisfaction**: 4.5/5 user satisfaction with suggestions
## Risk Assessment
### Technical Risks
- **Manifold Complexity**: Mathematical sophistication may introduce edge cases
- **Computational Cost**: Real-time manifold operations could be expensive
- **Data Requirements**: Needs substantial user data for accurate modeling
### Mitigation Strategies
- **Incremental Implementation**: Start with simplified manifolds, add complexity
- **Caching & Optimization**: Pre-compute expensive operations
- **Fallback Mechanisms**: Graceful degradation to traditional methods
## Conclusion
The dual manifold cognitive architecture represents a fundamental shift from **knowledge storage systems** to **cognitive augmentation platforms**. By modeling intelligence as the geometric intersection of personal and collective knowledge manifolds, we create systems that don't just retrieve information—they understand cognitive evolution, predict knowledge gaps, and optimize learning trajectories for maximum intellectual growth.
This architecture transforms the Advanced Second Brain from a tool into a **true cognitive partner** that evolves with you, understands your intellectual journey, and guides you toward optimal knowledge acquisition paths.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/technical-implementation/dual-manifold-core-specification.md

150
docs/plans/ui-integration-review.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
# UI Design Integration: Advanced Second Brain PKM System
## Executive Summary
After reviewing the comprehensive conversation log, I've integrated the detailed UI design specifications into our planning. The conversation represents an excellent, well-thought-out UI framework that perfectly aligns with our Dual Manifold Cognitive Architecture and Dana integration strategy. Rather than conflicting with our planning, it provides the missing UI layer that completes our technical foundation.
## Key UI Design Elements Now Incorporated
### Design Philosophy & Aesthetics
- **Dark Mode Default**: Deep charcoal backgrounds (#121212, #1E1E1E) for deep work
- **Color Coding**: Cyan for Dana code, purple for orchestration, emerald for insights/outputs
- **Typography**: Inter/Roboto for UI, Fira Code/JetBrains Mono for code
- **Layout**: Persistent left sidebar, collapsible panes for data density
### Core Views (Now Part of Phase 2 Planning)
#### 1. Dashboard (Home Base)
- **Goals Module**: Kanban/checklist for learning objectives and system status
- **Domain Grid**: Large cards with icons, doc counts, agent status indicators
- **Top Navigation**: Search, add domain button
#### 2. Domain Workspace - Knowledge Browser Mode
- **Three-Pane Layout**:
- Left: File tree drawer (250px, collapsible)
- Middle: Content viewer (flexible) - PDF reader, video player + transcript
- Right: Insights pane (400px) - fabric outputs, metadata toggle
- **Sub-Navigation**: Browser | Agent Studio | Settings tabs
- **Floating Chat**: Domain-specific agent chat overlay
#### 3. Domain Workspace - Agent Studio Mode
- **IDE Layout**:
- Left: Context panel (file checklists, graph visualizer)
- Middle: Dana editor with syntax highlighting, tabs for .na files
- Bottom: REPL terminal for testing
- **Interactive Elements**: Click nodes to highlight code/docs, build context buttons
#### 4. Global Orchestrator Chat
- **Central Chat Interface**: Multi-agent synthesis display
- **Scope Selector**: Checkboxes for domain selection (All, Neuroscience, CompSci, etc.)
- **Bottom Panel**: Agent status logs
## Technical Integration Points
### Dana Language Integration
- **Agent Blueprints**: Domain experts as Dana structs with resource bindings
- **REPL Integration**: Built-in Dana REPL for testing agent logic
- **Context Management**: File checklists for agent knowledge sources
- **Graph Visualization**: Interactive node maps for knowledge relationships
### Multi-Agent Orchestration
- **Domain Agents**: Per-directory experts with local data sovereignty
- **Orchestrator**: Cross-domain synthesis with scope-based routing
- **Scraping Agents**: Background processing for media/web content
- **Status Indicators**: Real-time agent activity monitoring
### Data Sovereignty & Processing
- **Local Directories**: Domain-specific folder structures
- **Automated Processing**: Background agents for transcription/processing
- **Fabric Patterns**: Structured insight extraction (summarize, extract ideas, etc.)
- **Media Support**: Video players with synchronized transcripts
## Updated Phase 2 Planning
### Phase 2: Core UI and Knowledge Browser (Weeks 5-8)
**Objective**: Build the complete user interface with all four core views, integrating Dana agents and dual manifold visualization.
#### Week 5: UI Foundation & Dashboard
- [ ] Implement dark mode theme system with color coding
- [ ] Create persistent left sidebar navigation
- [ ] Build dashboard with goals module and domain grid
- [ ] Set up collapsible pane system
#### Week 6: Domain Workspace - Knowledge Browser
- [ ] Implement three-pane layout (drawer/content/insights)
- [ ] Add file tree navigation with domain directories
- [ ] Create content viewers (PDF, video with transcripts)
- [ ] Build fabric pattern processing interface
- [ ] Integrate domain-specific chat overlay
#### Week 7: Domain Workspace - Agent Studio
- [ ] Build IDE-style layout with Dana editor
- [ ] Implement syntax highlighting for Dana language
- [ ] Create context panel with file checklists and graph visualizer
- [ ] Add REPL terminal with testing capabilities
- [ ] Integrate agent building and deployment
#### Week 8: Global Orchestrator & Integration
- [ ] Implement orchestrator chat with scope selectors
- [ ] Build multi-agent status monitoring
- [ ] Add cross-domain query routing
- [ ] Integrate with backend Dana agents
- [ ] Comprehensive UI testing and polish
## Alignment Assessment
### ✅ Perfect Alignment Areas
- **Domain-Centric Architecture**: Directory-based organization matches our domain resource model
- **Multi-Agent Hierarchy**: Orchestrator + domain agents align with our blueprint structure
- **Dana Integration**: REPL, editing, and agent management match our technical approach
- **Data Sovereignty**: Local processing and storage align with our resource model
- **Dual Functionality**: Consumer (browsing) + developer (agent building) modes
### 🔄 Integration Opportunities
- **Knowledge Graph Visualization**: UI includes graph viewers that complement our KG implementation
- **Media Processing**: Video transcription and fabric patterns extend our ingestion pipeline
- **Agent Status Monitoring**: Real-time indicators support our orchestration layer
- **Context Management**: File checklists align with our resource binding approach
### 📈 Enhancement Areas
- **Progressive Disclosure**: Collapsible panes support our data density requirements
- **Workflow Integration**: Fabric patterns complement our processing pipelines
- **Cross-Domain Queries**: Scope selectors enable our manifold fusion objectives
## Implementation Priority
### Immediate Integration (Phase 2 Foundation)
1. **UI Framework Setup**: Dark mode, color scheme, collapsible panes
2. **Dashboard Implementation**: Goals tracking, domain grid
3. **Three-Pane Browser**: File navigation, content viewing, insights pane
### Dana Integration (Phase 2 Advanced)
1. **Agent Studio**: Dana editor, REPL, context management
2. **Orchestrator Chat**: Multi-agent interface, scope selection
3. **Graph Visualization**: Knowledge relationship mapping
### Backend Integration (Phase 2-3 Bridge)
1. **API Endpoints**: Connect UI to Dana agents and manifolds
2. **Real-time Updates**: Agent status, processing feedback
3. **Data Synchronization**: UI state with backend resources
## Quality Assessment
**This UI design represents the "best version" because:**
1. **User-Centric Design**: Balances power user needs (agent development) with accessibility (intuitive browsing)
2. **Technical Soundness**: Properly integrates with Dana architecture and multi-agent systems
3. **Scalability**: Modular design supports domain expansion and feature growth
4. **Research-Backed**: Incorporates HCI principles and modern UX patterns
5. **Practical Implementation**: Detailed enough for development while flexible for iteration
## Next Steps
1. **Update Phase 2 Documentation**: Incorporate detailed UI specifications
2. **Create UI Component Library**: Based on the design system outlined
3. **Prototype Key Views**: Start with dashboard and knowledge browser
4. **Dana UI Integration**: Connect agent studio to backend blueprints
This conversation log contains exceptional UI design work that should be preserved and integrated as the foundation for our Phase 2 development. It provides the user experience layer that makes our technical architecture accessible and powerful.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/ui-integration-review.md

318
docs/plans/user-journeys/media-ingestion-workflow.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
# Media Ingestion and Processing Workflow
This document outlines the complete user journey for ingesting media content into the Advanced Second Brain PKM system, from initial file placement to actionable insights.
## Overview
The media ingestion workflow demonstrates the system's core value proposition: transforming passive media consumption into active knowledge management through automated processing, intelligent analysis, and seamless integration with the user's knowledge base.
## User Journey Map
### Phase 1: Content Acquisition (User Action)
**Trigger**: User discovers valuable content (lecture, podcast, video course)
**User Actions**:
1. Download or acquire media file (MP4, MP3, WebM, etc.)
2. Navigate to appropriate domain directory in file system
3. Place file in correct subfolder (e.g., `Neuroscience/Media/Lectures/`)
4. Optionally rename file for clarity
**System State**: File appears in domain directory, ready for processing
**User Expectations**:
- File placement should be intuitive
- No manual intervention required
- System should acknowledge file detection
### Phase 2: Automated Detection and Processing (Background)
**System Actions**:
1. **File Watcher Detection**: File system monitor detects new file within 5 seconds
2. **Metadata Extraction**: Extract file metadata (duration, size, format, creation date)
3. **Format Validation**: Verify file format is supported
4. **Queue Processing**: Add to media processing queue with priority
**Background Processing**:
1. **Transcription Service**: Send to Whisper/OpenAI/Google Speech-to-Text
2. **Transcript Generation**: Convert audio/video to timestamped text
3. **Quality Validation**: Check transcript accuracy (>90% confidence)
4. **Synchronization**: Align transcript with video timeline (if video)
5. **Storage**: Save transcript alongside original file
**System State**: Media file processed, transcript available
**User Feedback**: Notification in UI when processing complete
### Phase 3: Knowledge Integration (User Interaction)
**User Actions**:
1. Open Knowledge Browser for the domain
2. Navigate to media file in file tree
3. Click on video file to open in Content Viewer
**System Response**:
1. **Content Loading**: Display video player with controls
2. **Transcript Display**: Show synchronized transcript below video
3. **Navigation Integration**: Enable click-to-jump between transcript and video
**User Value**: Can now consume content with searchable, navigable transcript
### Phase 4: Intelligent Analysis (User-Driven)
**User Actions**:
1. Click "Run Fabric Pattern" button in Insight/Fabric pane
2. Select analysis pattern (e.g., "Extract Ideas", "Summarize", "Find Action Items")
3. Optionally adjust parameters
**System Actions**:
1. **Content Processing**: Send transcript to domain agent
2. **Pattern Execution**: Run selected Fabric analysis pattern
3. **Insight Generation**: Extract structured insights from content
4. **Result Display**: Show formatted results in right pane
**Example Output**:
```
## Extracted Ideas
- Neural networks can be understood as parallel distributed processors
- Backpropagation remains the most effective learning algorithm
- Attention mechanisms solve the bottleneck problem in RNNs
## Key Takeaways
- Deep learning has moved from art to science
- Transformer architecture enables better long-range dependencies
- Self-supervised learning reduces annotation requirements
```
### Phase 5: Knowledge Graph Integration (Automatic)
**System Actions**:
1. **Concept Extraction**: Identify key concepts from analysis results
2. **Graph Updates**: Add new concepts and relationships to knowledge graph
3. **Embedding Generation**: Create vector embeddings for new content
4. **Relationship Discovery**: Link to existing concepts in domain
**Background Processing**:
- Update semantic search index
- Recalculate concept centrality
- Generate cross-references to related content
- Update domain agent context
### Phase 6: Cross-Domain Connection (Optional Advanced Usage)
**User Actions**:
1. Notice connection between current content and another domain
2. Switch to Agent Studio mode
3. Modify Dana agent code to include cross-domain relationships
**Example Dana Code Modification**:
```
agent NeuroscienceAgent {
context: ["Neuroscience/Media/**", "CompSci/Papers/**"]
query(query) {
// Search both domains for neural network concepts
neuroscience_results = search_domain("Neuroscience", query)
compsci_results = search_domain("CompSci", "neural networks")
// Combine and synthesize results
return synthesize_results(neuroscience_results, compsci_results)
}
}
```
## Technical Implementation Details
### File System Integration
**Directory Structure**:
```
Domain_Name/
├── Media/
│ ├── Lectures/
│ ├── Podcasts/
│ ├── Videos/
│ └── Transcripts/ # Auto-generated
├── Papers/
├── Notes/
└── agent.na # Domain agent configuration
```
**File Naming Convention**:
- Original: `lecture_neural_networks_fundamentals.mp4`
- Transcript: `lecture_neural_networks_fundamentals.mp4.transcript.json`
### Processing Pipeline
**Queue Management**:
```python
@dataclass
class MediaProcessingJob:
file_path: str
domain_id: str
priority: int = 1
retry_count: int = 0
status: ProcessingStatus = ProcessingStatus.PENDING
```
**Processing Steps**:
1. **Validation**: Check file integrity and format support
2. **Transcription**: Call external API with error handling
3. **Post-processing**: Clean transcript, add timestamps
4. **Storage**: Save in structured JSON format
5. **Indexing**: Update search indices
6. **Notification**: Alert user of completion
### Transcript Format
**JSON Structure**:
```json
{
"metadata": {
"source_file": "lecture.mp4",
"duration": 3600,
"transcription_service": "whisper",
"confidence_score": 0.95,
"processing_timestamp": "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
},
"segments": [
{
"start": 0.0,
"end": 5.2,
"text": "Welcome to this lecture on neural networks.",
"confidence": 0.98
},
{
"start": 5.2,
"end": 12.1,
"text": "Today we'll cover the fundamental concepts...",
"confidence": 0.96
}
],
"chapters": [
{
"title": "Introduction",
"start": 0.0,
"end": 180.0
},
{
"title": "Basic Concepts",
"start": 180.0,
"end": 900.0
}
]
}
```
### Synchronization Mechanism
**Video-Transcript Sync**:
- **Click Transcript**: Jump to corresponding video timestamp
- **Video Playback**: Highlight current transcript segment
- **Search**: Find text and jump to video location
- **Export**: Generate timestamped notes with video references
### Fabric Analysis Patterns
**Pattern Framework**:
```python
@dataclass
class FabricPattern:
name: str
description: str
input_type: str # "transcript", "document", "mixed"
output_format: str # "bullet_points", "summary", "structured"
async def execute(self, content: str, context: Dict[str, Any]) -> PatternResult:
# Implementation varies by pattern
pass
```
**Built-in Patterns**:
1. **Extract Ideas**: Identify key concepts and insights
2. **Summarize**: Create concise content summary
3. **Find Action Items**: Extract tasks and follow-ups
4. **Generate Questions**: Create study/discussion questions
5. **Extract References**: Find citations and sources
6. **Timeline Analysis**: Create chronological breakdown
### Error Handling and Recovery
**Failure Scenarios**:
- **Transcription Failure**: Retry with different service, notify user
- **File Corruption**: Skip processing, log error, allow manual retry
- **Storage Issues**: Queue for later processing, alert admin
- **Analysis Errors**: Fallback to basic processing, partial results
**User Communication**:
- Processing status indicators in UI
- Notification system for completion/failures
- Manual retry options for failed jobs
- Progress tracking for long-running tasks
## Performance Requirements
### Processing Times
- **File Detection**: <5 seconds
- **Metadata Extraction**: <1 second
- **Transcription**: <10% of media duration (e.g., 6 min for 1-hour video)
- **Analysis**: <30 seconds for typical content
- **UI Updates**: <2 seconds for all operations
### Scalability Targets
- **Concurrent Processing**: 10 media files simultaneously
- **Queue Throughput**: 50 files per hour
- **Storage Growth**: Handle 100GB+ media libraries
- **Search Performance**: <500ms for transcript searches
## User Experience Considerations
### Progressive Enhancement
- Basic playback works immediately
- Transcripts appear asynchronously
- Analysis results load on demand
- Advanced features available when processing complete
### Accessibility
- Keyboard navigation for all controls
- Screen reader support for transcripts
- High contrast mode for video controls
- Adjustable playback speeds
### Mobile Considerations
- Responsive video player
- Touch-friendly transcript navigation
- Offline transcript access
- Bandwidth-adaptive quality
## Success Metrics
### User Engagement
- **Completion Rate**: % of videos watched with transcripts
- **Analysis Usage**: % of content analyzed with Fabric patterns
- **Time Saved**: Average time reduction vs. manual note-taking
- **Knowledge Retention**: User-reported learning improvement
### Technical Performance
- **Processing Success Rate**: >95% of files processed successfully
- **Transcript Accuracy**: >90% confidence scores
- **Analysis Quality**: >80% user satisfaction with insights
- **System Reliability**: <1% processing failures
## Future Enhancements
### Advanced Features
- **Multi-language Support**: Automatic language detection and translation
- **Speaker Diarization**: Identify different speakers in recordings
- **Emotion Analysis**: Detect speaker enthusiasm and emphasis
- **Concept Mapping**: Visual knowledge graphs from transcripts
- **Collaborative Annotations**: Shared notes and highlights
### Integration Opportunities
- **Calendar Integration**: Sync with lecture schedules
- **Note-taking Apps**: Export to Roam Research, Obsidian, etc.
- **Learning Platforms**: Integration with Coursera, edX, etc.
- **Social Features**: Share insights with study groups
This workflow transforms passive media consumption into an active, intelligent knowledge management process, demonstrating the system's core value proposition of making complex information accessible and actionable.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/user-journeys/media-ingestion-workflow.md

1
think_bigger Submodule

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Subproject commit 5ede9e2e7efcce0e5d507e89dd8f75f15fd68c69