- Complete planning documentation for 5-phase development - UI design specifications and integration - Domain architecture and directory templates - Technical specifications and requirements - Knowledge incorporation strategies - Dana language reference and integration notes
251 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
251 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Validation Criteria and Success Metrics
|
|
|
|
This document defines measurable criteria for validating the success of each project phase and the overall Advanced Second Brain PKM system.
|
|
|
|
## Validation Framework
|
|
|
|
### Validation Types
|
|
- **Technical Validation**: Code quality, performance, security
|
|
- **Functional Validation**: Features work as specified
|
|
- **User Validation**: Real users can accomplish tasks
|
|
- **Business Validation**: Value delivered meets objectives
|
|
|
|
### Validation Methods
|
|
- **Automated Testing**: Unit, integration, and end-to-end tests
|
|
- **Manual Testing**: User acceptance testing and exploratory testing
|
|
- **Performance Testing**: Load, stress, and scalability testing
|
|
- **User Research**: Surveys, interviews, and usability testing
|
|
- **Analytics**: Usage metrics and behavioral data
|
|
|
|
## Phase 1: Foundation Validation
|
|
|
|
### Technical Validation
|
|
- [ ] **API Availability**: All documented endpoints respond correctly
|
|
- *Measure*: 100% of endpoints return 200-299 status codes
|
|
- *Method*: Automated API tests
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: 100% pass rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Service Integration**: All services communicate properly
|
|
- *Measure*: Cross-service API calls succeed
|
|
- *Method*: Integration test suite
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >95% pass rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Data Persistence**: Database operations maintain integrity
|
|
- *Measure*: CRUD operations work without data corruption
|
|
- *Method*: Database integration tests
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: 100% data integrity
|
|
|
|
### Performance Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Response Times**: API endpoints meet latency requirements
|
|
- *Measure*: P95 response time <500ms for all endpoints
|
|
- *Method*: Load testing with 50 concurrent users
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: <500ms P95, <2s P99
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Resource Usage**: System operates within resource limits
|
|
- *Measure*: Memory usage <2GB, CPU <50% under normal load
|
|
- *Method*: Performance monitoring during testing
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: Within defined limits
|
|
|
|
### Security Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Sandboxing**: Dana execution is properly isolated
|
|
- *Measure*: Malicious code cannot access host system
|
|
- *Method*: Security testing with known exploits
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: 100% isolation maintained
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Data Sovereignty**: No data leaks to external services
|
|
- *Measure*: Network traffic analysis shows no unauthorized data transmission
|
|
- *Method*: Network monitoring and traffic analysis
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: Zero unauthorized data transmission
|
|
|
|
## Phase 2: Knowledge Browser Validation
|
|
|
|
### Functional Validation
|
|
- [ ] **File Navigation**: Users can browse domain directories
|
|
- *Measure*: File tree loads and navigation works
|
|
- *Method*: Manual testing with 10+ domain structures
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: 100% navigation success rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Document Rendering**: Various file types display correctly
|
|
- *Measure*: PDF, Markdown, text files render properly
|
|
- *Method*: Test with diverse document types and sizes
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >95% rendering success rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **UI Responsiveness**: Interface works across devices
|
|
- *Measure*: Layout adapts to screen sizes 1024px to 3840px
|
|
- *Method*: Cross-device testing (desktop, tablet, mobile)
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: No layout breaks, all interactions work
|
|
|
|
### User Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Task Completion**: Users can complete primary workflows
|
|
- *Measure*: Time to complete "browse and read document" task
|
|
- *Method*: User testing with 10 participants
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >80% complete task in <5 minutes
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Intuitive Navigation**: Users understand interface without training
|
|
- *Measure*: Navigation success rate without hints
|
|
- *Method*: Usability testing with first-time users
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >70% successful navigation
|
|
|
|
## Phase 3: Content Processing Validation
|
|
|
|
### Functional Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Media Processing**: Files are automatically detected and processed
|
|
- *Measure*: Processing success rate for supported formats
|
|
- *Method*: Test with 20+ media files of various types
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >90% processing success rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Transcript Quality**: Generated transcripts are accurate
|
|
- *Measure*: Word error rate (WER) for transcriptions
|
|
- *Method*: Compare against human-transcribed samples
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: <10% WER for clear audio
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Analysis Accuracy**: Fabric patterns produce useful results
|
|
- *Measure*: User-rated usefulness of analysis outputs
|
|
- *Method*: User evaluation of 50+ analysis results
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >75% rated as "useful" or "very useful"
|
|
|
|
### Performance Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Processing Speed**: Content processing meets time requirements
|
|
- *Measure*: Processing time relative to content duration
|
|
- *Method*: Benchmark with various content lengths
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: <15% of content duration for processing
|
|
|
|
## Phase 4: Agent Studio Validation
|
|
|
|
### Functional Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Code Editing**: Dana code editor works correctly
|
|
- *Measure*: Syntax highlighting, error detection, auto-completion
|
|
- *Method*: Test with complex Dana code examples
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: All editor features functional
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Agent Testing**: Users can test agent modifications
|
|
- *Measure*: REPL execution success rate
|
|
- *Method*: Test with various agent configurations
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >90% execution success rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Graph Visualization**: Knowledge graph displays correctly
|
|
- *Measure*: Node/edge rendering, interaction, performance
|
|
- *Method*: Test with graphs of varying complexity (10-1000 nodes)
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: Smooth interaction with <2s load times
|
|
|
|
### User Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Customization Success**: Power users can modify agents effectively
|
|
- *Measure*: Percentage of users who successfully customize agents
|
|
- *Method*: Testing with 20 technical users
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >60% successful customizations
|
|
|
|
## Phase 5: Orchestration Validation
|
|
|
|
### Functional Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Query Routing**: Queries are routed to appropriate agents
|
|
- *Measure*: Correct agent selection for various query types
|
|
- *Method*: Test with 100+ diverse queries
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >85% correct routing
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Response Synthesis**: Multi-agent responses are coherent
|
|
- *Measure*: User-rated coherence of synthesized responses
|
|
- *Method*: User evaluation of 50+ multi-agent responses
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >70% rated as "coherent" or "very coherent"
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Performance**: Cross-domain queries meet latency requirements
|
|
- *Measure*: Response time for complex queries
|
|
- *Method*: Load testing with concurrent queries
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: <5s P95 response time
|
|
|
|
## Overall System Validation
|
|
|
|
### User Experience Validation
|
|
- [ ] **Onboarding Success**: New users can get started independently
|
|
- *Measure*: Task completion rate for "first hour experience"
|
|
- *Method*: User testing with 20 first-time users
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >70% complete core onboarding tasks
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Daily Usage**: System supports regular knowledge work
|
|
- *Measure*: Daily active usage, session length, feature usage
|
|
- *Method*: Beta testing with 50+ users over 2 weeks
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >30 min daily usage, >50% feature utilization
|
|
|
|
### Technical Validation
|
|
- [ ] **System Reliability**: Uptime and error rates meet requirements
|
|
- *Measure*: Service uptime, error rates, incident response time
|
|
- *Method*: Production monitoring over 30 days
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >99.5% uptime, <1% error rate
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Scalability**: System handles growth in users and data
|
|
- *Measure*: Performance under increased load
|
|
- *Method*: Scalability testing with simulated growth
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: Maintains performance with 10x user growth
|
|
|
|
### Business Validation
|
|
- [ ] **User Satisfaction**: Users find value in the system
|
|
- *Measure*: Net Promoter Score, user satisfaction surveys
|
|
- *Method*: Post-MVP surveys with 100+ users
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >50 NPS, >4/5 satisfaction rating
|
|
|
|
- [ ] **Feature Usage**: Core features are used regularly
|
|
- *Measure*: Feature adoption rates, usage frequency
|
|
- *Method*: Analytics tracking over 60 days
|
|
- *Success Threshold*: >70% users use core features weekly
|
|
|
|
## Validation Timeline
|
|
|
|
### Weekly Validation (During Development)
|
|
- **Unit Test Coverage**: >80% maintained
|
|
- **Integration Tests**: Run daily, >95% pass rate
|
|
- **Performance Benchmarks**: No regression >10%
|
|
- **Security Scans**: Clean results weekly
|
|
|
|
### Milestone Validation (End of Each Phase)
|
|
- **Functional Completeness**: All phase features implemented
|
|
- **Quality Standards**: All tests pass, no critical bugs
|
|
- **User Testing**: Representative users validate workflows
|
|
- **Performance Requirements**: All SLAs met
|
|
|
|
### MVP Validation (End of Phase 2+)
|
|
- **User Acceptance**: Beta users can use system productively
|
|
- **Technical Stability**: No critical issues in production-like environment
|
|
- **Performance**: Meets all user-facing requirements
|
|
- **Documentation**: Complete user and technical documentation
|
|
|
|
## Validation Tools and Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
### Automated Validation
|
|
- **CI/CD Pipeline**: Runs all tests on every commit
|
|
- **Performance Monitoring**: Automated performance regression detection
|
|
- **Security Scanning**: Integrated vulnerability scanning
|
|
- **Accessibility Testing**: Automated WCAG compliance checking
|
|
|
|
### Manual Validation
|
|
- **User Testing Lab**: Dedicated environment for user research
|
|
- **Bug Tracking**: Comprehensive issue tracking and management
|
|
- **Analytics Dashboard**: Real-time usage and performance metrics
|
|
- **Feedback Collection**: Multiple channels for user input
|
|
|
|
### Quality Gates
|
|
- **Code Review**: Required for all changes
|
|
- **Testing**: Must pass before merge
|
|
- **Security Review**: For sensitive changes
|
|
- **Performance Review**: For performance-impacting changes
|
|
|
|
## Success Criteria Summary
|
|
|
|
### Minimum Success Criteria (Must Meet)
|
|
- [ ] All critical user journeys work end-to-end
|
|
- [ ] System is secure and respects data sovereignty
|
|
- [ ] Performance meets user expectations
|
|
- [ ] Code quality meets professional standards
|
|
|
|
### Target Success Criteria (Should Meet)
|
|
- [ ] Advanced features work reliably
|
|
- [ ] User experience is exceptional
|
|
- [ ] System scales to realistic usage levels
|
|
- [ ] Documentation is comprehensive and helpful
|
|
|
|
### Stretch Success Criteria (Nice to Meet)
|
|
- [ ] Innovative features delight users
|
|
- [ ] System becomes a platform for extensions
|
|
- [ ] Community adoption and contributions
|
|
- [ ] Industry recognition and awards
|
|
|
|
This validation framework ensures the Advanced Second Brain PKM system delivers real value to users while maintaining high technical and quality standards throughout development.</content>
|
|
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/milestones/validation-criteria.md |