think-bigger/docs/plans/milestones/validation-criteria.md
Kade Heyborne 48c6ddc066
Add comprehensive project documentation
- Complete planning documentation for 5-phase development
- UI design specifications and integration
- Domain architecture and directory templates
- Technical specifications and requirements
- Knowledge incorporation strategies
- Dana language reference and integration notes
2025-12-03 16:54:37 -07:00

251 lines
10 KiB
Markdown

# Validation Criteria and Success Metrics
This document defines measurable criteria for validating the success of each project phase and the overall Advanced Second Brain PKM system.
## Validation Framework
### Validation Types
- **Technical Validation**: Code quality, performance, security
- **Functional Validation**: Features work as specified
- **User Validation**: Real users can accomplish tasks
- **Business Validation**: Value delivered meets objectives
### Validation Methods
- **Automated Testing**: Unit, integration, and end-to-end tests
- **Manual Testing**: User acceptance testing and exploratory testing
- **Performance Testing**: Load, stress, and scalability testing
- **User Research**: Surveys, interviews, and usability testing
- **Analytics**: Usage metrics and behavioral data
## Phase 1: Foundation Validation
### Technical Validation
- [ ] **API Availability**: All documented endpoints respond correctly
- *Measure*: 100% of endpoints return 200-299 status codes
- *Method*: Automated API tests
- *Success Threshold*: 100% pass rate
- [ ] **Service Integration**: All services communicate properly
- *Measure*: Cross-service API calls succeed
- *Method*: Integration test suite
- *Success Threshold*: >95% pass rate
- [ ] **Data Persistence**: Database operations maintain integrity
- *Measure*: CRUD operations work without data corruption
- *Method*: Database integration tests
- *Success Threshold*: 100% data integrity
### Performance Validation
- [ ] **Response Times**: API endpoints meet latency requirements
- *Measure*: P95 response time <500ms for all endpoints
- *Method*: Load testing with 50 concurrent users
- *Success Threshold*: <500ms P95, <2s P99
- [ ] **Resource Usage**: System operates within resource limits
- *Measure*: Memory usage <2GB, CPU <50% under normal load
- *Method*: Performance monitoring during testing
- *Success Threshold*: Within defined limits
### Security Validation
- [ ] **Sandboxing**: Dana execution is properly isolated
- *Measure*: Malicious code cannot access host system
- *Method*: Security testing with known exploits
- *Success Threshold*: 100% isolation maintained
- [ ] **Data Sovereignty**: No data leaks to external services
- *Measure*: Network traffic analysis shows no unauthorized data transmission
- *Method*: Network monitoring and traffic analysis
- *Success Threshold*: Zero unauthorized data transmission
## Phase 2: Knowledge Browser Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **File Navigation**: Users can browse domain directories
- *Measure*: File tree loads and navigation works
- *Method*: Manual testing with 10+ domain structures
- *Success Threshold*: 100% navigation success rate
- [ ] **Document Rendering**: Various file types display correctly
- *Measure*: PDF, Markdown, text files render properly
- *Method*: Test with diverse document types and sizes
- *Success Threshold*: >95% rendering success rate
- [ ] **UI Responsiveness**: Interface works across devices
- *Measure*: Layout adapts to screen sizes 1024px to 3840px
- *Method*: Cross-device testing (desktop, tablet, mobile)
- *Success Threshold*: No layout breaks, all interactions work
### User Validation
- [ ] **Task Completion**: Users can complete primary workflows
- *Measure*: Time to complete "browse and read document" task
- *Method*: User testing with 10 participants
- *Success Threshold*: >80% complete task in <5 minutes
- [ ] **Intuitive Navigation**: Users understand interface without training
- *Measure*: Navigation success rate without hints
- *Method*: Usability testing with first-time users
- *Success Threshold*: >70% successful navigation
## Phase 3: Content Processing Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **Media Processing**: Files are automatically detected and processed
- *Measure*: Processing success rate for supported formats
- *Method*: Test with 20+ media files of various types
- *Success Threshold*: >90% processing success rate
- [ ] **Transcript Quality**: Generated transcripts are accurate
- *Measure*: Word error rate (WER) for transcriptions
- *Method*: Compare against human-transcribed samples
- *Success Threshold*: <10% WER for clear audio
- [ ] **Analysis Accuracy**: Fabric patterns produce useful results
- *Measure*: User-rated usefulness of analysis outputs
- *Method*: User evaluation of 50+ analysis results
- *Success Threshold*: >75% rated as "useful" or "very useful"
### Performance Validation
- [ ] **Processing Speed**: Content processing meets time requirements
- *Measure*: Processing time relative to content duration
- *Method*: Benchmark with various content lengths
- *Success Threshold*: <15% of content duration for processing
## Phase 4: Agent Studio Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **Code Editing**: Dana code editor works correctly
- *Measure*: Syntax highlighting, error detection, auto-completion
- *Method*: Test with complex Dana code examples
- *Success Threshold*: All editor features functional
- [ ] **Agent Testing**: Users can test agent modifications
- *Measure*: REPL execution success rate
- *Method*: Test with various agent configurations
- *Success Threshold*: >90% execution success rate
- [ ] **Graph Visualization**: Knowledge graph displays correctly
- *Measure*: Node/edge rendering, interaction, performance
- *Method*: Test with graphs of varying complexity (10-1000 nodes)
- *Success Threshold*: Smooth interaction with <2s load times
### User Validation
- [ ] **Customization Success**: Power users can modify agents effectively
- *Measure*: Percentage of users who successfully customize agents
- *Method*: Testing with 20 technical users
- *Success Threshold*: >60% successful customizations
## Phase 5: Orchestration Validation
### Functional Validation
- [ ] **Query Routing**: Queries are routed to appropriate agents
- *Measure*: Correct agent selection for various query types
- *Method*: Test with 100+ diverse queries
- *Success Threshold*: >85% correct routing
- [ ] **Response Synthesis**: Multi-agent responses are coherent
- *Measure*: User-rated coherence of synthesized responses
- *Method*: User evaluation of 50+ multi-agent responses
- *Success Threshold*: >70% rated as "coherent" or "very coherent"
- [ ] **Performance**: Cross-domain queries meet latency requirements
- *Measure*: Response time for complex queries
- *Method*: Load testing with concurrent queries
- *Success Threshold*: <5s P95 response time
## Overall System Validation
### User Experience Validation
- [ ] **Onboarding Success**: New users can get started independently
- *Measure*: Task completion rate for "first hour experience"
- *Method*: User testing with 20 first-time users
- *Success Threshold*: >70% complete core onboarding tasks
- [ ] **Daily Usage**: System supports regular knowledge work
- *Measure*: Daily active usage, session length, feature usage
- *Method*: Beta testing with 50+ users over 2 weeks
- *Success Threshold*: >30 min daily usage, >50% feature utilization
### Technical Validation
- [ ] **System Reliability**: Uptime and error rates meet requirements
- *Measure*: Service uptime, error rates, incident response time
- *Method*: Production monitoring over 30 days
- *Success Threshold*: >99.5% uptime, <1% error rate
- [ ] **Scalability**: System handles growth in users and data
- *Measure*: Performance under increased load
- *Method*: Scalability testing with simulated growth
- *Success Threshold*: Maintains performance with 10x user growth
### Business Validation
- [ ] **User Satisfaction**: Users find value in the system
- *Measure*: Net Promoter Score, user satisfaction surveys
- *Method*: Post-MVP surveys with 100+ users
- *Success Threshold*: >50 NPS, >4/5 satisfaction rating
- [ ] **Feature Usage**: Core features are used regularly
- *Measure*: Feature adoption rates, usage frequency
- *Method*: Analytics tracking over 60 days
- *Success Threshold*: >70% users use core features weekly
## Validation Timeline
### Weekly Validation (During Development)
- **Unit Test Coverage**: >80% maintained
- **Integration Tests**: Run daily, >95% pass rate
- **Performance Benchmarks**: No regression >10%
- **Security Scans**: Clean results weekly
### Milestone Validation (End of Each Phase)
- **Functional Completeness**: All phase features implemented
- **Quality Standards**: All tests pass, no critical bugs
- **User Testing**: Representative users validate workflows
- **Performance Requirements**: All SLAs met
### MVP Validation (End of Phase 2+)
- **User Acceptance**: Beta users can use system productively
- **Technical Stability**: No critical issues in production-like environment
- **Performance**: Meets all user-facing requirements
- **Documentation**: Complete user and technical documentation
## Validation Tools and Infrastructure
### Automated Validation
- **CI/CD Pipeline**: Runs all tests on every commit
- **Performance Monitoring**: Automated performance regression detection
- **Security Scanning**: Integrated vulnerability scanning
- **Accessibility Testing**: Automated WCAG compliance checking
### Manual Validation
- **User Testing Lab**: Dedicated environment for user research
- **Bug Tracking**: Comprehensive issue tracking and management
- **Analytics Dashboard**: Real-time usage and performance metrics
- **Feedback Collection**: Multiple channels for user input
### Quality Gates
- **Code Review**: Required for all changes
- **Testing**: Must pass before merge
- **Security Review**: For sensitive changes
- **Performance Review**: For performance-impacting changes
## Success Criteria Summary
### Minimum Success Criteria (Must Meet)
- [ ] All critical user journeys work end-to-end
- [ ] System is secure and respects data sovereignty
- [ ] Performance meets user expectations
- [ ] Code quality meets professional standards
### Target Success Criteria (Should Meet)
- [ ] Advanced features work reliably
- [ ] User experience is exceptional
- [ ] System scales to realistic usage levels
- [ ] Documentation is comprehensive and helpful
### Stretch Success Criteria (Nice to Meet)
- [ ] Innovative features delight users
- [ ] System becomes a platform for extensions
- [ ] Community adoption and contributions
- [ ] Industry recognition and awards
This validation framework ensures the Advanced Second Brain PKM system delivers real value to users while maintaining high technical and quality standards throughout development.</content>
<parameter name="filePath">docs/plans/milestones/validation-criteria.md